Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Dealer told me 90% of the time they’ll honor the warranty if they do the work. I’m waiting for a response. Trying to see if the kit will work, then play with different options. 
And my need was for a full size pickup with a crew cab and 6’ bed. Towing came second because I don’t tow much or often enough to need a 2500. The options I had  available locally were ******. It was either the truck I got or a $70k Denali 2500. I’m a firm believer 1/2 tons aren’t built for towing. But occasionally hauling the toys out to play, a box trailer, and potentially a tent trailer is all I’ll be doing. 
Ahh, at first I was like OMG he wants to lift then tow 13k.....

With GM saying it isn't compatible, the dealer will of course cover the labor they do, but GM won't cover the parts in an unapproved application. So if the shock seal blows you likely would have to work a deal with the dealership.

The first thing I would determine is how slow you are willing to go off road.
We have long wheelbases so rockcrawling is unlikely. Also need to decide how comfortable you require the ride to be off road. And finally for the "value" question how often do you drive off road vs on road.

If you are looking for something simple you can try the lower and upper spacer level kits. Completely reversible if you don't like it. Cheap. Good starting point. Throw a small generic block in the rear and see how you like it. Unlocking extra travel gets expensive FAST. My kit will probably be $6k+

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Posted

i have the same truck but short bed with a 3 in superlift with the bilstien option worked just fine rides fine also .  its on page 26 of the leveled thread with info.  When i had the stock 275/60 20s tires  and rims on it  before alignment i did notice the tires were real close to the uca so if you want to go too much wider  you will need a spacer  or different offset wheel. Towing capacity im sure will suffer slightly . the max i tow is a 20 ft bass boat and since my 2017 gmc  had a 7 in lift on it with a 5.3 and towed the boat just fine. i went  with superlift  because you can return it to stock which i will before trade in.

Posted
1 hour ago, woodsnwater said:

i have the same truck but short bed with a 3 in superlift with the bilstien option worked just fine rides fine also .  its on page 26 of the leveled thread with info.  When i had the stock 275/60 20s tires  and rims on it  before alignment i did notice the tires were real close to the uca so if you want to go too much wider  you will need a spacer  or different offset wheel. Towing capacity im sure will suffer slightly . the max i tow is a 20 ft bass boat and since my 2017 gmc  had a 7 in lift on it with a 5.3 and towed the boat just fine. i went  with superlift  because you can return it to stock which i will before trade in.

How is your travel up front? I saw this kit but not too excited about spacers. I also don’t want to level it. 

Posted

@topgear1224 sometimes I like to smash off road lol. Just depends on the trail. I live in MT so hunting and camping sometimes can lead down some damn good roads. Not to mention the snow. 
 

My main goal is at least a 34” tire with extra travel both front and rear. Looks like with that 2” lift I might be able to fit a 35.
Once I hear back from GM I might just do the whole 2” kit, then AAL to help the softer shocks. I think the front spring rate will be solid enough to assist the softer struts. 
As far as comfort goes, I love the stock ride with the max tow, I prefer a stiffer ride with some give when it matters. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Sierra50BMG said:

How is your travel up front? I saw this kit but not too excited about spacers. I also don’t want to level it. 

travel is fine  but the most off roading i do any more are rutted up field roads going to hunt not really beating it up . 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Sierra50BMG said:

@topgear1224 sometimes I like to smash off road lol. Just depends on the trail. I live in MT so hunting and camping sometimes can lead down some damn good roads. Not to mention the snow. 
 

My main goal is at least a 34” tire with extra travel both front and rear. Looks like with that 2” lift I might be able to fit a 35.
Once I hear back from GM I might just do the whole 2” kit, then AAL to help the softer shocks. I think the front spring rate will be solid enough to assist the softer struts. 
As far as comfort goes, I love the stock ride with the max tow, I prefer a stiffer ride with some give when it matters. 

the GM kit will just raise the static height and will not add any extra travel. you are trading height for droop travel. 

 

if a lift kit doesn't include UCA i would assume it doesn't add any travel. (not 100% true but most current kits is true. Due to the old issues with driveline/ balljoint angles, most kits just trade droop for tire to fender clearance.) 

 

 

up to 35% more front travel with stage 2+ kits. (stage 1 is 25%)

https://www.iconvehicledynamics.com/products/?fit=1&model=Silverado 1500

 

you can piece together your own kit. i would suggest:

front

icon front extended coilovers 71606 

Tubular UCA 78620DJ

Rear 

M-27 www.camburg.com/

a shock with the same specs as these should work (extended, compressed lengths. - these are "1.8 inch piston" shocks compared to the icon's "2.5 shock" )

https://www.roughcountry.com/v2-monotube-shock-absorber-760738a.html?find=2019-chevy-silverado-1500-4wd-568358

 

i will likely be doing UCA with Fox DSC shocks front and rear . and custom rear leaf springs from deaver.

 

OR if i cant fit bigger than 33 anyways go with a custom Icon stage 4  with factory rake.

 

 

Edited by topgear1224
  • Like 1
Posted

My 2020 High County with max tow is currently getting the ready lift SST 4 inch lift with 35s, will be done tomorrow 

IMG_5430 (1).jpg

Posted
13 minutes ago, justint said:

My 2020 High County with max tow is currently getting the ready lift SST 4 inch lift with 35s, will be done tomorrow 

IMG_5430 (1).jpg

Post an installed update please!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,351 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...