Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wanting to do a new muffler for the truck with new piping from muffler exit to tips. Thinking about the Corsa muffler that Aces Performance offers. Anybody got info on the drone with the AFM in the new trucks? Don’t matter what exhaust you have, just wondering if it’s to much to handle or just hold off and delete AFM first. 

Posted

2020 5.3L with 10 spd trans, Borla S Type catbacks and no drone. Flappers and screens eliminated. My 2015 5.3L with Flowmaster had a ton of drone. Muffler type will give different results, as will 5.3 vs. 6.2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted
On 5/10/2020 at 5:29 PM, loud_pipes said:

2020 5.3L with 10 spd trans, Borla S Type catbacks and no drone. Flappers and screens eliminated. My 2015 5.3L with Flowmaster had a ton of drone. Muffler type will give different results, as will 5.3 vs. 6.2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Oh yeah I know different mufflers will determine different drone and stuff. On my 16, I swapped to Carven and obviously could tell when it dropped but it wasn’t TO bad. 

Posted

2020 6.2 Max Tow with GM performance intake and exhaust.  No flappers, no drone.  I can hear the exhaust when accelerating, but when cruising the exhaust noise is lost in the road noise.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Sorry I'm new to this. I know what a cat- back system is but what are "flappers" and "screens"?

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Posted
Oh yeah I know different mufflers will determine different drone and stuff. On my 16, I swapped to Carven and obviously could tell when it dropped but it wasn’t TO bad. 

Progressive I assume. I had the Competitor series on my 18 and I had to buy a Range device. Lol
Posted (edited)
On 5/27/2020 at 12:27 AM, RND4mGuy said:

Sorry I'm new to this. I know what a cat- back system is but what are "flappers" and "screens"?

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk
 

If you look at the exhaust system you will see a flapper valve prior to the stock muffler on 5.3, and I believe one before and one after the muffler on the 6.2. Its a little restrictor that is inside the pipe. It opens to allow exhaust flow under acceleration, but closes back up as the RPM's come down. The screens are just that, sections of metal screen on the inside (towards spare tire) of both tail pipes. This is done to minimize drone. A cat back eliminates all of that stuff.

 

  I put a Borla S type cat back on mine, Very happy with it.

Edited by Jac365
Add
Posted
If you look at the exhaust system you will see a flapper valve prior to the stock muffler on 5.3, and I believe one before and one after the muffler on the 6.2. Its a little restrictor that is inside the pipe. It opens to allow exhaust flow under acceleration, but closes back up as the RPM's come down. The screens are just that, sections of metal screen on the inside (towards spare tire) of both tail pipes. This is done to minimize drone. A cat back eliminates all of that stuff.
 
  I put a Borla S type cat back on mine, Very happy with it.

What truck do you have? Any drone? What about when the truck goes to V4 mode?

On my 18 with Carven Competitor, V4 sounded like absolute garbage and I used the Range AFM religiously.
Posted (edited)

I have a 19 AT4 5.3. Prior to this I had a 12 Sierra SLT 5.3 with AFM. I also used the range box on my 12. I hated the V-4 mode.

As of right now I do not have a Range box for the AT4, but I do plan on getting one. If you REALLY listen for it you will hear subtle differences in the exhaust tone with the Borla. These new trucks also have a decal burble as they downshift, much the same as my old tweaked 5 speed stick IROC Camaro did when downshifting. Nice little rumble.

 

 Under acceleration you WILL hear the Borla in the cab. Cruising along you will not, the road noise will be louder. These new trucks have DFM, which is different from AFM. With AFM the SAME 4 cylinders are deactivated every time. With DFM ANY cylinder can be activated or deactivated. It may run with 2,3,4,5,6,7, or all eight cylinders, depending on what power is needed. From what I understand running the Air Conditioner will keep all 8 cylinders activated.

 

   I am not a fan of any cylinders being deactivated. I bought a V-8 because I WANT a V-8. I don't give a rats ass about MPG. But Federal regulations are forcing the manufacturer to come up with ways to attain mandated ratings.

 

   Does the truck sound as good as my old 2004 Pro Sport Sierra with the 5.3 and the Corsa duals and no AFM/DFM? Almost, which is good enough for me.

 

   And if you used a Range Box, your truck should NEVER go into V-4 mode.

Edited by Jac365
Posted

Hell, I can hear subtle differences in the DFM with the stock exhaust. I wasn’t planning on putting exhaust on my 2020 AT4 for this reason. I feel like it would amplify it more than I want.

Posted
On 5/31/2020 at 9:09 AM, Jac365 said:

From what I understand running the Air Conditioner will keep all 8 cylinders activated.

Is this true?! Is it really that simple?

Posted
3 hours ago, beefin06 said:

Is this true?! Is it really that simple?

If it ever warms up enough here in the northeast to use the air conditioner I'll be able to find out for sure.

  • 5 months later...
Posted
On 5/10/2020 at 5:29 PM, loud_pipes said:

2020 5.3L with 10 spd trans, Borla S Type catbacks and no drone. Flappers and screens eliminated. My 2015 5.3L with Flowmaster had a ton of drone. Muffler type will give different results, as will 5.3 vs. 6.2.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

My plan is to just replace the muffler with a Corsa muffler a local shop sales. Either that, Borla, or back to Carven like I had on my 16. I'm going to get rid of the flapper valve and I THINK just have all new piping ran from the muffler back to corsa style tips so I can get rid of the mesh screens without having to try and cover them. I'm hoping the drone wont be to bad, I've just read where the screens take away from some of the actual exhaust sound. 

Posted

My 2021 Trail Boss w/6.2 and 10 speed shows up in 2 weeks. Have done a lot of searching and I think I got it. Delete boths valves and replace stock muffler with Flowmaster 3.5" 40 series for max flow and run tranny locked in 9th to eliminate ugly AFM noise. Hoping that running cold air intake and 3.5 " pipe all the way back makes the same power as GM power package, 435 HP . Also hoping FM muffler and leaving resonators in place keeps drone at bay while holding 9th gear eliminates AFM. Sound like a winner?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,827 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...