Jump to content

LED DRL Conversion

ado

By ado
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

ado Enthusiast

ado

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have read many threads on here about deleting/relocating DRLs on the 2015-2019 HD Chevrolet trucks. I wasn't ever that concerned with it until I decided to upgrade my headlights. I bought the Morimoto XB headlights (that have not arrived yet) that have the separate LED tubes in them as well as LED headlights. This would also come in handy for HID upgrades as well (not burning them during the day). I wanted the LED tubes to act like the factory DRLS, not the lowbeams. As you may know, GM uses PWM (pulse width modulation) over 1 wire to differentiate between DRL and full low beam. I also wanted to keep all factory automatic headlight operation, just activating LED running lights instead of lowbeams when in gear.  This excluded the pin swap and the switch mod because I wanted the automatic function to remain intact. To the drawing board I went!

 

What I came up with was a harness that will T into the factory harness between the headlight and factory plugs. All wires are passed through except the low beam. The low beam input is redirected to a circuit I created to filter the PWM and only activate a relay when full lowbeam signal is sent. After the circuit design and testing, I got some PCBs made and put it all together.  I then tapped the trailer brake running light fuse to power the circuit so it has power after the truck is shut off until the lights turn off which helps with all of the factory light operation. I have installed everything and it works as expected, I have no DRLS currently with everything else functioning like the factory automatic settings would. I'm just waiting for my headlights to come in so I can get them installed and get the LED tubes hooked into the DRL signal! Here are a few pics of the setup.

 

Harness

 

spacer.png

 

Circuit - I'm going to fill the box with epoxy once completely done for weatherproofing

 

spacer.png

 

Pass Side Tap

 

spacer.png

 

Cross Harness

 

spacer.png

 

Driver Side Tap

 

spacer.png

 

Relay

 

spacer.png

 

Circuit in Box

 

spacer.png

 

 

 

I will get some updated pictures of the DRL operation if my headlights ever arrive! I have been waiting since the beginning of April for them when they were on pre-order. 

Edited by ado
  • Like 2
  • 2 months later...
Chad Walker Enthusiast

Chad Walker

Posted
Posted

Sweet.  So you will be manufacturing and selling these?  By the way, that isn't a question.  

  • Haha 1
  • 4 weeks later...
ado Enthusiast

ado

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That may be a challenge. I wouldn't be able to manufacture them myself on a large scale, but depending on quantities I probably could. I just got an update on the Morimoto XB headlights and they are now saying December 1st as a release date. 

  • 4 months later...
ado Enthusiast

ado

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I finally got the XB headlights and what a difference. The LED's act as the DRL now when the truck is in gear. All auto functions work just like factory. No low beams for DRL. 

 

It's dirty...but here are a few pictures. More to come...

 

truck

 

All lights on...

 

Truck-1

 

The pictures don't show the pure white of the lights.

Chad Walker Enthusiast

Chad Walker

Posted
Posted

Excellent.  That is the one thing I miss about my Ford.  I could change the DRLs with software and an OBD2 connector.  We need something similar for GM.

  • 3 weeks later...
chevyzr1 Enthusiast

chevyzr1

Posted
Posted
On 2/8/2021 at 12:24 PM, ado said:

I finally got the XB headlights and what a difference. The LED's act as the DRL now when the truck is in gear. All auto functions work just like factory. No low beams for DRL. 

 

It's dirty...but here are a few pictures. More to come...

 

truck

 

All lights on...

 

Truck-1

 

The pictures don't show the pure white of the lights.

Did you have to wire them for the drl's to be on the leds or do they come that way ? I also ordered these for my 2019 and I'm still waiting on them. One thing I'm a little disappointed with after seeing your pictures is it looks like the side marker has an amber lens yet on the trs website they make it look like it's a clear lens with an amber bulb. Looks a million times better than factory headlights !!!! How is the performance? I have the d2s projectors with dense bulbs and computers and I will say I think they'll be hard to beat as far as output. Thanks again for sharing they look great !

ado Enthusiast

ado

Posted
  • Author
Posted

These trucks use 1 wire to the low beams from the factory for the DRL and low beam. The circuit I created and built splits that signal into DRL and low beam for two different bulbs. In this case the DRL portion is wired to the LED strips in the morimoto lights that activate when in gear and the low beams only come on when lights are needed. They do look much better! So far so good on performance, just need to get them adjusted when I can find the time after dark. 

  • 2 months later...
ado Enthusiast

ado

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well I finally got some more pictures up.

 

Daytime running lights, only when in gear. They are brightest here.

 

spacer.png

 

Running lights on. Dims the LED DRL

 

spacer.png

 

Headlights on

 

spacer.png

 

I set the turn signals to scroll, so as one side scrolls, the other stays white.

 

Here is a short video on that. It sped up a little when converting it, I'm not sure why. It does not flash that fast in real time.

 

spacer.png

 

Overall they are working like expected and a big upgrade in my opinion over factory.

 

 

  • 3 months later...
RaceCitySilv New Member

RaceCitySilv

Posted
Posted

@adoThis setup is exactly what I am trying to achieve. Can you give any more insite into the harness you made? I would like to try making my own or possibly buy one from you if your selling???

DBeau Enthusiast

DBeau

Posted
Posted

I second that, I would like to get on that list if your willing to sell the kit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 413 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...