Jump to content

1/2 ton VS. 3/4 ton tire size

spm4520
 Share

Recommended Posts

spm4520 New Member

spm4520

Posted
Posted

Can anyone help explain why my '97 Chevy 1/2 ton 4x4 comes stock with 265/75/16s which are a 1" taller and a 1" wider than my '02 2500HD 8.1l 4x4 that has 245/75/16s?

 

I've always felt like the 3/4 ton sits like a 2wd truck when compared to other "stock" 4x4s on the road. Maybe I have the last one in existence that hasn't had the torsion keys turned up or a leveling kit put on?

 

Was a larger tire size ever an option for a stock 2500HD?

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

The spec tires for what the vehicle can do, so that's kinda why they are skinnier and they can handle more weight.

 

That 245/75 was the tire size all the way to 2007 in the classic body style. Most people would switch to a 265/70/16 for a better look. Or they would go 265/75/16 for a 1in larger tire. You'd go from a 30.5 to a 31.5in tire.

spm4520 New Member

spm4520

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I appreciate the reply but your answer seems counterintuitive. A smaller, skinnier tire can carry more load? I believe that opposite to be true. Compare the tire size of an appliance dolly to passenger car to semi truck to mega dump trucks. The larger the tire, the more surface area it has to distribute the load and reduce the strain on the tire.

Edited by spm4520
MORSNO Enthusiast

MORSNO

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, spm4520 said:

I appreciate the reply but your answer seems counterintuitive. A smaller, skinnier tire can carry more load? I believe that opposite to be true. Compare the tire size of an appliance dolly to passenger car to semi truck to mega dump trucks. The larger the tire, the more surface area it has to distribute the load and reduce the strain on the tire.

There is a limit to where larger is better, the larger wide tires are D load rated many times (60psi vs 80psi max), so make sure you look at the load rating not just the size.  Many smaller tires have high load ratings, especially when comparing 16" and 17", 17's have almost all been de-rated in load capacity recently for some unknown reason.  

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 7/25/2020 at 10:27 AM, spm4520 said:

I appreciate the reply but your answer seems counterintuitive. A smaller, skinnier tire can carry more load? I believe that opposite to be true. Compare the tire size of an appliance dolly to passenger car to semi truck to mega dump trucks. The larger the tire, the more surface area it has to distribute the load and reduce the strain on the tire.

 

Tire size is not always directly related to load rating of the tire.  Load index is very important as well.  You never want to go under the stock load index, especially when it comes to trucks.  Has to be the same or higher.  P metric vs LT (C/D/E load) makes a difference.    

 

2001-2006 HD trucks ran LT245/75R16 tires.  E load.  The load index on them is 120, which is 3169lbs.  So, each tire is rated to carry 3169lbs.  The only other size GM used in the 2004-2006 (excluding dually) was on 3500.  They used an LT265/75R16 E load but on a 16x7in wheel.  The 245 trucks have a 16x6.5in wheel.  

 

The 265/75R16 tires on your 97 1/2 ton are most likely a P load tire (unless you've put LT on it).  The load index on a P265/75R16 can vary by manufacturer, but its between 114 and 116 so 2640-2806lbs.  So P tires vs LT will make a big difference in the load capability of each tire.   

 

Therefore, an LT245/75R16 E is a higher capacity tire than a P265/75R16.  

 

On LT tires, yes, the load rating will increase with size, but you still have to watch.  An LT265/75R16 E load would have a load index of 123 (3472lbs) and would have more load capacity than the LT245/75R16.  

 

 

Edited by newdude

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,866
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Greg3160
    Newest Member
    Greg3160
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 418 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • MANGOAL
      Mangoal or FitcamX OEM Dashcam?

      By MANGOAL · Posted

      Late reply, but yes—it works on the SLT trim. Compatibility comes down to the plastic shroud shape behind your mirror, not the trim badge itself. On the SLT with auto-dimming, it uses a plug-and-play Y-harness off the mirror/rain sensor power, so no need to run wires down to the OBD port. If anyone's ever unsure about fitment, just drop a photo of your mirror housing and we can double-check it.   Appreciate the detailed feedback on the install! On the windshield glare—we actually took feedback like yours and developed a dedicated CPL (polarizer) filter to cut down dash reflections on sunny days. If you're still running the cam, shoot me a DM. I'd be happy to send a CPL filter over for you to test out—no charge. 
    • davester
      2002 GMC Yukon

      By davester · Posted

      There are no stickers in your glovebox?
    • davester
      Weight limit in bed

      By davester · Posted

      Look at the numbers on the stickers in the door jam...
    • EJS2015
      Actual Full Screen CarPlay on Refreshed Silverado/Sierras.

      By EJS2015 · Posted

      Yes, every time the developer updates his code, you must recompile. I will private message you with the latest because it changes pretty much with every version.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Transmission Temperature Hitting 220s

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      After I wrote that reply I went for a ride. 85 F out. So trans started at 85 F and it shifted the same as it did an hour latter at 168 F. I've never actually recorded the to cold to shift point but it is under 32 F before they start hanging on to a lower gear or leaving the converter unlocked. Both intended to heat fluid.    Yes, brake or bake. Absolutely.      Your welcome. True research ended decades ago. Field trials are still in play.    There is a thing called oxidation onset temperature. This is the heat related oxidation not the O2 exposure kind. For mineral oil that starts at 140 F. So what happens after 140 F? Each 20 F cuts fluid life in half! Does using a Full Synthetic improve that? Yes! By how much? Depends on the base oil type and a few other factors. But enough to notice. Some esters are even higher. There are even synergies between types the will raise it higher than any one component is alone.    Then there is "Hindered" oils. Antioxidant additives. Hindered Polyol Esters can sit at 500 F for years in a turbine.   When a blender brags his oil will 'take 500 F" in service he doesn't specify for how long. Water will dance on a 500 F hot plate for several seconds. @newdude put up a chart showing the relationship between fluid temperature and it's life in an automatic transmission. Here's a version of that chart for Group III based oils. These temperatures are those in the pan as observed as 'normal'. that is you drive as you do for as long as you do under what load you ask of it and whatever that temperature is this graph applies to. Flash temperatures of a few minutes isn't what his means.    Note that fluids held at a constant 240 F have a service life of only 20K miles. 220 F explains the factory exchange limit, eh? My equipment I keep under 180 F and I'm good if the cooler will hold it as low as 140 F. But that's me.   

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...