Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking for deals on Tonneau covers.
No folding, no soft shell, must have locking.  
Would like something comparable to the Retrax One XR (cheapest I have found is 1299).  Locking and side channels for attachments above the bed for bikes/skis, etc.  
Does GM have anything going on?  
If you see any good deals post them up please!

Posted

Update:
GM is running the 25% off MSRP.  They have the Embark LS Retractable Aluminum which is the same as the Retrax Pro XR with install at dealer for 1,650.35

However I do not see the Embark LS in poly on the GM website. Thats too bad, with 25% off I would snap that up in a heart beat.  Does anyone know if this can be ordered from the dealer in Poly?

I can get the Retrax One XR (Poly)  for 1299. But would have to install myself, which is fine, I just like having it all under warranty at the dealer if possible.  

Posted
10 hours ago, Phatty said:

Update:
GM is running the 25% off MSRP.  They have the Embark LS Retractable Aluminum which is the same as the Retrax Pro XR with install at dealer for 1,650.35

However I do not see the Embark LS in poly on the GM website. Thats too bad, with 25% off I would snap that up in a heart beat.  Does anyone know if this can be ordered from the dealer in Poly?

I can get the Retrax One XR (Poly)  for 1299. But would have to install myself, which is fine, I just like having it all under warranty at the dealer if possible.  

This appears to be what your looking for:

https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-ls-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-associated-accessories-19419843?vin=3GCUYGET3LG363107&categoryId=98027

 

It indicates polycarbonate construction in the description as well.  This one indicates standard bed as that's what my VIN pulled for available GM accessories for my truck.  Here is the Embark Aluminum I believe you were alluding to earlier:

https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-max-aluminum-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-–-associated-accessories-19416972?vin=3GCUYGET3LG363107

 

So, you are a big fan of the Embark LS with the poly construction??  I've been looking at multiple options for a retractable tonneau cover for my truck.  I was leaning towards a Gatortrax MX retractable tonneau cover until I saw your comment on the Embark LS.  If I can get one of those on Black Friday through GM for 25% off I might take a good look.  

Posted
8 hours ago, beauso79 said:

This appears to be what your looking for:

https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-ls-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-associated-accessories-19419843?vin=3GCUYGET3LG363107&categoryId=98027

 

It indicates polycarbonate construction in the description as well.  This one indicates standard bed as that's what my VIN pulled for available GM accessories for my truck.  Here is the Embark Aluminum I believe you were alluding to earlier:

https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-max-aluminum-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-–-associated-accessories-19416972?vin=3GCUYGET3LG363107

 

So, you are a big fan of the Embark LS with the poly construction??  I've been looking at multiple options for a retractable tonneau cover for my truck.  I was leaning towards a Gatortrax MX retractable tonneau cover until I saw your comment on the Embark LS.  If I can get one of those on Black Friday through GM for 25% off I might take a good look.  


So both of those you posted are the aluminum covers.  The difference is the LS has the rail slot for Crossbar attachments, hence why its $100 more.
The poly version NON-LS is here for $1259: 
https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-poly-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-associated-accessories-19416970?year=2020&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado 1500&modelId=491&body=Crew Cab Pickup&bodyId=22&wheel=Standard Box&wheelId=652&trim=LT&trimId=430&drive=4WD&driveId=8&engine=3.0L L6 DIESEL&engineId=17881&bodyNumDoors=5&categoryId=98027

They do not appear to sell the LS in a poly.  I tried calling a couple dealers yesterday and never got through to an actual parts representative... surprise, surprise. 
 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Phatty said:


So both of those you posted are the aluminum covers.  The difference is the LS has the rail slot for Crossbar attachments, hence why its $100 more.
The poly version NON-LS is here for $1259: 
https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-poly-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-associated-accessories-19416970?year=2020&make=Chevrolet&model=Silverado 1500&modelId=491&body=Crew Cab Pickup&bodyId=22&wheel=Standard Box&wheelId=652&trim=LT&trimId=430&drive=4WD&driveId=8&engine=3.0L L6 DIESEL&engineId=17881&bodyNumDoors=5&categoryId=98027

They do not appear to sell the LS in a poly.  I tried calling a couple dealers yesterday and never got through to an actual parts representative... surprise, surprise. 
 

So do they have the description wrong on the Chevy/GM Accessories website wrong then??

https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-ls-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-associated-accessories-19419843?vin=3GCUYGET3LG363107&categoryId=98027

 

I see Polycarbonate Construction but nothing indicating Aluminum in the description. From the link above:

MSRP $1,929.00*

  • Unique Trax Rail design allows for rack and accessory compatibility that offers enhanced hauling options (Thule Cross rails sold separately)
  • The rigid polycarbonate construction helps provide impact resistance and UV protection, and will hold up to 500 lbs. evenly distributed — easily supporting heavy loads
  • Sealed Ball Bearing Design which allows the cover to roll maintenance free without binding, and be key lockable in any position
  • Patented Flush Front Cover for a low profile appearance and minimizing water intrusion
  • Exposed stake pockets
  • UV treated to help with protection from sun
  • Kit includes, Tonneau cover, hardware and keys
Posted
44 minutes ago, beauso79 said:

So do they have the description wrong on the Chevy/GM Accessories website wrong then??

https://accessories.chevrolet.com/product/standard-bed-embark-ls-retractable-tonneau-cover-by-advantage-associated-accessories-19419843?vin=3GCUYGET3LG363107&categoryId=98027

 

I see Polycarbonate Construction but nothing indicating Aluminum in the description. From the link above:

MSRP $1,929.00*

  • Unique Trax Rail design allows for rack and accessory compatibility that offers enhanced hauling options (Thule Cross rails sold separately)
  • The rigid polycarbonate construction helps provide impact resistance and UV protection, and will hold up to 500 lbs. evenly distributed — easily supporting heavy loads
  • Sealed Ball Bearing Design which allows the cover to roll maintenance free without binding, and be key lockable in any position
  • Patented Flush Front Cover for a low profile appearance and minimizing water intrusion
  • Exposed stake pockets
  • UV treated to help with protection from sun
  • Kit includes, Tonneau cover, hardware and keys

Yes It appears to be the wrong description.  The Poly will only hold up to 200lbs.  Aluminum will hold 500.  

https://retrax.com/retraxone-xr/2020/gmc/sierra-1500

Posted
On 11/23/2020 at 8:13 PM, beauso79 said:

So, are you not a fan of the Aluminum construction option or do you just like the price point of the Polycarbonate construction better? I was just wondering why your preferred the Poly option?

I love aluminum.  I just think its overkill for a cover.  I'm not going to be standing up on it and the poly will hold up to weather just fine.  My truck is parked in garage and gets taken out for mtn biking, snowmobiling, camping, basically play time or family trips etc.  Hard to justify extra $500 for aluminum when it doesn't really benefit my situation at all.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Phatty said:

I love aluminum.  I just think its overkill for a cover.  I'm not going to be standing up on it and the poly will hold up to weather just fine.  My truck is parked in garage and gets taken out for mtn biking, snowmobiling, camping, basically play time or family trips etc.  Hard to justify extra $500 for aluminum when it doesn't really benefit my situation at all.  

Understandable......Personally I like the Tri-Fold options so you can utilize the entire truck bed.  The problem is I can't find a Tri-Fold that allows it to be locked partially opened/closed.  So, when I put a dog crate in the back and have to fold it mostly open and then nothing is left protected.  Unless you are aware of any?  Being able to lock these covers anywhere along the rail is ideal 

  • Like 1
Posted

Al vs poly?

 

Aluminum will hold more, but if there is weight on it (someone stands/walks on for example) there is a good chance that the coating will get scratched.  If scratched thru the coating -- the al colour will show. 

 

Poly isn't rated to hold as much.

If it does get scratched -- it's still black.

 

Had poly version on last truck.

Since GM decided to change the box sizes an new one is required. 

Another poly is on the way. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Phatty said:

I love aluminum.  I just think its overkill for a cover.  I'm not going to be standing up on it and the poly will hold up to weather just fine.  My truck is parked in garage and gets taken out for mtn biking, snowmobiling, camping, basically play time or family trips etc.  Hard to justify extra $500 for aluminum when it doesn't really benefit my situation at all.  

I agree - even if I'm strapping bags on top, I don't think it would ever see 200lb of gear.

Besides, $500 goes a loooong way on the mtb...that's a nice rear wheel, custom suspension tune, used to be what you could get a new fork for!

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Justin Vaughn said:

I agree - even if I'm strapping bags on top, I don't think it would ever see 200lb of gear.

Besides, $500 goes a loooong way on the mtb...that's a nice rear wheel, custom suspension tune, used to be what you could get a new fork for!

Im looking at the Retrax One XR model that has the slot in the side rail to attach cross bars to put on extra storage bins, bike racks, skis, etc.  So i wont ever strap anything to the cover itself.  
And like beauso79, the option to slide and lock is important to me.

Ive been waiting on Retrax to get a black friday deal out, every other tonneau cover company has 15-30% off.  Id do the 25% off from GM in a heartbeat if it was the right version.  Hopefully Retrax announces something today...  

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Phatty said:

Im looking at the Retrax One XR model that has the slot in the side rail to attach cross bars to put on extra storage bins, bike racks, skis, etc.  So i wont ever strap anything to the cover itself.  
And like beauso79, the option to slide and lock is important to me.

Ive been waiting on Retrax to get a black friday deal out, every other tonneau cover company has 15-30% off.  Id do the 25% off from GM in a heartbeat if it was the right version.  Hopefully Retrax announces something today...  

And within seconds of posting, Retrax announces 15% off sitewide.

On the retrax site with 15% and taxes it came to 1,275.38

I went to https://tonneaucovered.com/ and called them.  $1169 free shipping, no tax. Placed my order.  Retrax One XR, 6'7" standard bed.

The standard embark poly from GMC with the 25% off and tax would have been $1035.  Feel like I did pretty well. since the xr is usually $100 over the standard poly I would have only saved $34 had I been able to get it through GMC.  

Good luck and happy shopping guys!

Edited by Phatty
Adding information
Posted (edited)

Is

7 hours ago, Phatty said:

Im looking at the Retrax One XR model that has the slot in the side rail to attach cross bars to put on extra storage bins, bike racks, skis, etc.  So i wont ever strap anything to the cover itself.  
And like beauso79, the option to slide and lock is important to me.

Ive been waiting on Retrax to get a black friday deal out, every other tonneau cover company has 15-30% off.  Id do the 25% off from GM in a heartbeat if it was the right version.  Hopefully Retrax announces something today...  

Ideally I wouldn't either, but it would be easy to add a couple strap points on the rail and strap across/etc without incurring the $500 expense of getting crossbars, basket, etc setup and having to deal with storage when not in use. I have a THULE rooftop bag that would be perfect to toss on top and strap to the rails.  A bit unrefined, I know...lol.

@phatty  - if you're ever interested in a KNOLLY, let me know, I can get you hooked up!PXL_20201119_211812427.thumb.jpg.5294a6172ebcf7e7148be61feb543551.jpg

Edited by Justin Vaughn
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,636 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...