Jump to content

Strange Starting Issue - Dealer Struggling to diagnose, Silverado in excellent condition


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello, I am seeking feedback and ideas for a problem my truck is having.  Truck is in excellent condition and has been 100% reliable until this issue came up.  All regular maintenance is performed at the dealer.  Truck is pretty much a pavement princess - I don't drive it hard and I detail it often (looks new inside and out).  2017 Silverado, crew cab, Z71, All-Star Edition, 5.3, 6SP - 83K miles (Highway miles, I travel to ride dirt bikes recreationally, no towing ever.).  Here is the issue history that started about 6 months ago.  The battery died (normal) and I replaced with an O'Reilly's battery.  A couple months later the vehicle would sometimes not start when the key was turned all the way to the starting position.  The vehicle would start on the 2nd or 3rd attempt (turn key off and then back to start).  A couple times I let the vehicle sit and tried again and it started.  All the power/electrical comes on when the key is turned to the on position. When the key is turned to the start position, there is nothing (the starter does not engage).  O'Reilly's warrantied the battery and sold me a more expensive one ($40) and said it was a better battery for the truck because of the remote starter.  Btw, the battery is never dead.  There is always power to turn on electronics, lights, and start the vehicle if the starter engages.  Anyhow, months later the problem still happens (sometimes daily and sometimes not for several days), except once it threw the vehicle into limp mode.  They said there was a throttle body issue and they remapped the CPU.  I got the truck back and week later I could feel my stability control working on the front right wheel while I was crusing at 35MPH.  The stability control like came on and then the engine light started flashing.  The dealer said there was a cylinder misfire (#5),a bad spark plug and this caused the stability control issue.  They also replaced the ignition coil.  I get the vehicle back and have the same problem the next morning (turn the vehicle to start, starter does not engage, turn off, turn back on vehicle starts...can be on the 2nd or 3rd attempt).  The start up sound sounds a little weaker than normal when the issue is happening, as during normal starting the 5.3 comes to life very strong sounding when the issue is not happening.  That said I have had the vehicle at the dealer for a combined 4 days and paid $200 for the extended warranty charges.  My next step is to have a meeting with the service advisor and service manager.  Anyone have any ideas I can present to the dealer?   (Why would the starter not engage when the key is turned to the start position?) Thank you.  

Edited by Micah Page
Posted (edited)

The battery makes me think that somehow the problem is related to it.  Did you install the battery?  Maybe you inadvertently did something when doing so. You also could have a battery cable problem. Even though they may appear in good condition there may be hidden corrosion inside.  There have been reports of persons having weird starting issues related to bad cables, their might even be a service bulletin on that?

Edited by elcamino
Posted

Thank you for your reply and the suggestions.  O'Reilly's installed the battery.   All this started after the battery was swapped.  I'm going to discuss the cables and any potential services bulletins with the dealer.  That seems like a good thing to look into.  Thank you again.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

. The simple basic things to do that precede simple voltmeter  checks are to hold the key in the full start position whenever it will not crank (no starter rotation) and wiggle the shift lever in park (even when locked in park). If the engine starts cranking when wiggling the shifter, then the issue lies in the trans selector circuit. Try it in neutral when it is acting up and see if that cures it.

Ignition switches also can cause quite a few intermittent no crank problems.

 

Proper electrical diagnosis is a logical progression and doesn't care about any assumptions about previous repairs. Those will only cloud the logical diagnosis. Cranking problems can be diagnosed quickly if the problem is present when diagnosing.

Voltage drop tests and the wire wiggle test can help to find intermittent issues. Sounds like you need a more technical technician.

Edited by savagebob
grammar correction
Posted

If a couple of months passed after changing the battery, and there were no starting problems in that 2 month period, then all bets are off as to what the problem could be. Like I stated above, the diagnosis is not difficult if carried out in a logical progression, with simple electrical checks with only a voltmeter and a couple of jumper wires.

Posted (edited)

Thank you for the reply.  It is very helpful.  I am going to take it to a different dealer...there are several in this area.

Edited by Micah Page
Posted
10 hours ago, savagebob said:

If a couple of months passed after changing the battery, and there were no starting problems in that 2 month period, then all bets are off as to what the problem could be. Like I stated above, the diagnosis is not difficult if carried out in a logical progression, with simple electrical checks with only a voltmeter and a couple of jumper wires.

Agree

The problem is finding the tech capable or willing to do it. 

Posted (edited)

Summary from the dealer:  There is corrosion on the negative battery cable.  He implied that this could have caused the starter motor to fail.  Replacing the negative battery cable, starter motor, and installing new spark plugs (truck has 84K miles...this was my choice).  So that should be it.   Thank you for the replies!  I appreciate the support from the community.

Edited by Micah Page

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 793 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...