Jump to content

anybody got a powder coated bumper?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'd like to know a bit more about its "crashability" rating for backing into a parking lot pole at 5mph. That is sorta typical, misjudging a fence post or something similar. You back up, thinking you are clear and wham the bumper into the pole.

 

The new Ford was ripped for that test. The cargo box would have been fine, but the bumper which really looks very typical and just like ours, caved in and caused damage to the cargo box.

 

I think my point is, if I'm going to upgrade the back bumper, I'd like to know if it would survive acting as a, ummmm, bumper. I'd like one that is as cool looking as what is in the link in the previous message, but not as overbearing (for some folks), as say a RanchHand rear bumper.

Posted

well, surprisingly, backing into a pole is why im replacing my stock chrome one. my bro drove the truck, late one night, didn't know there was a pole behind him, and back into, scraped the heck outta it, and now it is rusting on the underside. i talked to the guys on truckpeformance website, they said it is a stock replacement. so i'd assume it acts the same as a stock bumper! well, at any rate, i ordered one, it cost 178 shipped. not bad, considering the thing normally costs 180. ehh, we'l see, keep em comments comin!

Aj

Posted

I don't have a powder coated bumber, but after years of rusting, and having to take them off and sand & paint them, I had the gates to my back yard powder coated. They measure 16 feet across and 7 feet high. Cost about 350 bucks so I think you could get your bumber done for around 75 to 100 bucks. They look great, and are going on 2 years with no rust. (I live very close to the ocean). The way they explained it to me, it will dent with the metal, but there is always a possibility of the integrity of the coating being breached with an impact, in which case you would then be exposed to the elements, and rust as the outcome. I think it is worth trying.

 

Bill

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Notes 7/18/2026   3,400 miles on this batch of Mobil 1 Euro 5W40 since the GDI pump replacement. Alcohol runs very clean when ring seal is tight and the sump isn't getting hosed with fuel. Checked oil level at fill up today as is my practice and grabbed a white Kleenex to look at the color. What color?  I was going to change it but.....  
    • 4 low is really nice on steep boat ramps. 
    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...