Jump to content

Upper Control Arm Questions

schnid21

By schnid21
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

schnid21 Enthusiast

schnid21

Posted
Posted

Hey guys

 

I’ve read quite a few different posts on this but haven’t been able to 100% understand it / get my answer. 
 

I have a 2018 Sierra that has 100k km on it.  Leveled since new with a RC spacer up front.  Stock 20” rims with 33” BFG tires. 
 

I have lots of front end clunks and need to replace by upper ball joints.  I was going to replace with aftermarket to correct the ball joint angles.  Here is where the questions start though.  
 

I’ve looked at Ready Lift and Cognito.  Cognito installation instructions say to cut the frame vs Ready Lift does not.  I do plan to sell this truck in a year or two so I don’t want to start cutting it up unless I need to.  
 

Cognito seems to be the most popular brand.  But again I would prefer not to cut anything.  Is there any drawbacks to going with Ready Lift and not cutting the frame stops?
 

I’ve also read various reviews where people say that if you cut the frame stops for the Cognito you should get longer struts to ensure proper travel?   Any truth to this?  
 

Im looking to keep things simple.  Just address the ball joint issue so any advice you have would be appreciated.  
 

Thanks 

 

Jason

ftwhite Enthusiast

ftwhite

Posted
Posted (edited)

If the object is to keep it simple, use the ReadyLift control arms. They have a replaceable ball joint, and probably work with your spacer lift. 

 

In either case, once you get them installed, check your max droop. This is the max down travel of the tire/suspension. Jack one side of the car up at a time, and then both sides at the same time. If the UCA is NOT hitting the droop stop ("frame", but really just a welded bracket), then either the shock, or something else is stopping the down travel. Find what it is. If it's the shock, then you are good (you need to measure to figure this out). if it's the UCA hitting the coil, then your spacer is too tall.

If it does hit the droop stop, then it is limiting shock travel. Might be a good thing as it might limit the UCA hitting something else further down, or the ball joint getting maxed out. 

However, aftermarket UCAs, ball joints, and coil overs are usually designed for more droop travel. So if you don't remove the factory droop stops, you are kind of wasting money, or at least creating an abrupt suspension limit for no reason. 

But again, to keep it simple, just buy the aftermarket UCAs for their improved ball joints, which you needed to do anyway, and leave the droop stop in, which limits travel and is harder on the arms, but no more so than it has already been. 

 

Note: I am still learning about suspension and how all the parts influence each other, so their maybe better advice out there, but this has worked for me on two Silverado's, one Jeep, and one 4runner. Just being transparent.  

I cut the droop stops off my 2018, but I have Fox 2.0 coil overs for 2" lift, after market wheels with 0 offset, and Cognito UCAs. It seems to work just fine. The coil overs are the droop limiter for mine. 

Edited by ftwhite

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...