Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

At 25K miles the emergency brakes required replacement.  There  was an actuator failure on one side and the brake pads were worn out to the point where the dealership could not get the actuator to reset.  Therefore the pads for the emergency brakes needed replacement.  Has anyone had the emergency brake pads replaced at 25K miles ?   Tried dealing with GM and they will not work with me on this stating the brakes are only covered for 7500 miles and are a wear out item.  I have never had emergency brakes fail in 25k mile on a vehicle before.  Has anyone experienced this as GM will not work with me on the cost to replace the brakes at $1400.

Posted

Parking brake shoes are like $60 or $70 bucks for OEM.  How are they coming up with $1400 to replace them?  Even if they are throwing an actuator at it, the actauator is around $250?  I would question the dealer and their quote.

Sounds to me like the actuator failed, causing the brake to drag and hence, wearing out the pad.  Technically, those pads shouldnt really "wear out" as they are merely holding the vehicle and not stopping it from motion.  If the failed actuator is covered under warranty, i would push the issue of the failed part wearing out the pad.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Have them order 84582652 and 84582651.  These are the entire assembled parking brake with actuator.  Just the actuator is $482.92 ITSELF.  These brake assemblies are $308.77 ea.  

 

You are still looking at probably 3hrs per side of labor as they will have to pull the hubs to do this.  

 

Actually, this is probably what they quoted you.  So yea, its right.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, newdude said:

Have them order 84582652 and 84582651.  These are the entire assembled parking brake with actuator.  Just the actuator is $482.92 ITSELF.  These brake assemblies are $308.77 ea.  

 

You are still looking at probably 3hrs per side of labor as they will have to pull the hubs to do this.  

 

Actually, this is probably what they quoted you.  So yea, its right.  

That’s Spendy. I would just go with out parking brakes. I’ve yet to use mine but I live in the flat Midwest. 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Pryme said:

That’s Spendy. I would just go with out parking brakes. I’ve yet to use mine but I live in the flat Midwest. 

 

 

States that have vehicle inspections (NY for example) you need them to pass inspection.  

Edited by newdude
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,881 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...