Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I HAVE SEARCHED THE FORUM SO IF THIS IS ALREADY POSTED PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK! 

 

I am unable to find anyone looking to swap their stock 275/50/R22 High Country with 305/45/R22 Ridge Grapplers.  There is a thread floating around with the 285/45/R22 and another with the 305/45/R22 however those weren't Ridge Grapplers.... 

 

I want to try and keep the truck 100% stock. Has anyone ran these tires on a 2019+ High Country stock without rubbing? 

 

thanks in advance! 

Posted

You aren't going to find a thread on if a specific tire brand model fits, it goes by size. A quick search found this one, so if you searched any thread discussing that size will give you your answer. Going that specific, do you want it on a certain color truck or rim too? 

 

 

Tyler

Posted

Thanks, I saw that post however there was another post I stumbled across that stated different manufactures may slightly differ in size. That's why I asked specifically for info on the Ridge Grappler 

Posted

Idk no about the Ridge Grapplers specifically, but you can resort to 3/8" spacers if they did rub the UCA's. Here is the clearance of my 305's to the UCA's with the 3/8" spacer installed. 

 

 

IMG_20221028_141019843.jpg

Posted

Thank you! That's the only area I am concerned with. I guess worst case scenario I can throw a set of spacers on it. 

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Jswaze88 said:

Thank you! That's the only area I am concerned with. I guess worst case scenario I can throw a set of spacers on it. 

I posted a thread a while back on which wheel studs to use if you  want to run 3/8 or 1/2 spacers with the same amount of thread purchase as stock. Or not, some guys are comfortable and have no issues running 3/8 spacers on stock studs with about 7 turns on the lug nut.

 

 

 

--

--

 

Edited by Diamond817
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...