Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2003 Chevrolet Silverado 2500Hd 4x4 with 6.0 LQ4, 4L80e and manually shifted transfer case. Burned up the transmission so I picked up a used 4L80E out of a 2004 Suburban 2500 with the 6.0. 

 

Well finally get it installed and during the installation, had 1 plug I could not figure out where it went to. Well after scratching my head for a few days discovered the replacement transmission is missing a speed sensor. Swap it over from the old transmission.

 

Take it for a drive and no speedo. Anyone run into this before? 

Posted

Speedo is run by the sensor at the back of the transfer case.  IIRC from when I converted my truck from 2 to 4wd, the 2wd 4l80e has a sensor at the front and a sensor at the rear, and when converting it over, the sensor on the front is still used/plugged in, and the sensor in the rear isn't used anymore, the plug that would go into it, instead plugs into the 4wd harness, which then plugs into the sensor at the rear of the transfer case (it's basically a short extension cord to that sensor).

Posted

The harness in my truck has plugs for both front and rear on the transmission. Also none of the harness is modular, it's all one piece. So there's no 4wd harness per say, it's just part of the engine harness.

 

The truck the used trans came out of was the exact same drive train (engine and transmission) other than being a year newer and a suburban not a silverado.

 

 

Posted

Having a '06 2500HD, and from doing a lot of research on how the 4wd setup works on that generation truck, yes, it is modular.  The 4wd harness goes from the front diff,  up to the engine fuse block, where it plugs into the main truck harness and has ground point, then back to the the transfer case, and makes a U going forward to plug into the end of the harness going to the transmission (namely, the plug what would go on the VSS at the end of the transmission if it was a 2wd truck).

 

It plugs into the rear of the transfercase so that it can read the actual vehicle speed.  If it used the transmission output shaft speed, it would need another sensor to know whether the transfer case was in hi or lo (which it doesn't have).

Posted

Ok, this is my first Silverado. I dont have any plugs on the rear of the transfer case. I will have to look again. 

Posted

Davester, thank you so much, that last post helped so much. I figured out that the plug I have a picture of above went to the plug for the second speed sensor! Plugged in and issue is fixed! Thank you so much again.

Posted

Second speed sensor?  The sensor on the front of the TC, above the manual shift lever, is the 2wd/4wd mode sensor.

 

There's no VSS sensor on the rear of the transmission (or at least, it's not used, my '06 has a plug that goes into it instead of a sensor).  The harness along the transmission plugs into the transfer case harness instead of where that plug goes.

Posted

So....the transfer case harness had the second plug off of the VSS in the transfer case that just looped back to the plug that would have plugged into the 2nd VSS on the transmission, had it been there. 

 

But as soon as I plugged that plug on the transmission harness to the transfer case harness, the speedometer came to life the abs light went out, and the service brake system message went away. The transmission now shifts properly too.

 

Thank you again for your help. Doing all this work (new engine install, transmission replacement, new fuel lines, etc) all solo I was bound to miss a few things. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,737
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Christopher Miller
    Newest Member
    Christopher Miller
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 2 Anonymous, 1,529 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Without knowing how bad your banging is, one suggestion is the intermediate steering shaft on the steering wheel. These used to be a problem on 800 and earlier series. The feeling/sound was sometimes described as "clunking" and was felt in the wheel. Also there is a plastic piece in the lower column that is referred to as a bearing. Not your traditional looking bearing though. Your ball joints, bushings and tie rods or steering rack (if equipped) are the main point of issues. You never mention total unit miles, only that you've put 60k on it.   You can search the site for help on the ISS description. Plenty of these have been replaced   https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=site%3Agm-trucks.com+intermediate+steering+shaft&ia=web
    • Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm  and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe  and   stated she can not belive the difference.
    • Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.
    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...