Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everyone I’m new to this forum so I hope this is an acceptable topic.

I have a 1996 K1500 4.3L and I’m having heating issues. Started off with no heat and ended up needing a thermostat. That worked for a winter and now we’re back again. I determined the heater core was not allowing fluid through so I put a new core and hoses in and confirmed fluid is flowing as well as another 195° thermostat just for good measure but the truck still has questionable heat. Where should a guy look next? It runs pretty consistently at 170°F despite the 195° thermostat.

 

Posted

Are both heater hoses about the same temp?  if not the core is restricted still. if so the blend door or actuator is probably stuck or not working. does the truck have a/c and electronic control or no a/c cable control?

Posted
1 hour ago, Zachtheame said:

as well as another 195° thermostat just for good measure but the truck still has questionable heat.

What brand?

If not OEM then Motorad is one to look for.

Posted

sounds like there's still a restriction in the coolant lines. maybe in the fittings for the heater hoses on the engine? Does the return line go to the radiator or the water pump? Inlet temp should be the same as engine coolant. You could reverse flush the heater core with a garden hose just to make sure it's clear

Posted

We replaced the inlet and return lines completely except for the metal tube section in the middle which we cleared with a wire bottle brush. If there is an obstruction it would have to be within the water pump itself but I pulled the outlet line off and ran it and the flow seemed as free as I would expect it 

 

The supply line originated in the block and terminated at the water pump 

Posted

you got your self a real head scratcher! you replaced the Fitting on the intake manifold ? The oem fitting was a quick connect aluminum deal that was prone to corrosion. Even if engine temp is only 170 you should have good heat. as stated if the heater circuit is clear the inlet should be same temp as engine and return only a few degrees cooler at 1200 rpm 

Posted

We sure did, the fitting snapped when we tried removing it necessitating it’s replacement. It sure is a head scratcher, we’ve tried everything. And it’s something that happened between this year and last year because the heat was stellar last year 

Posted

some radiators have a nipple for the return line that would be capped off where yours returns to the water pump, if you have that you could switch the return to there and cap the water pump nipple and see if that helps

Posted

Right side just below the rad cap, not all rads have it. if you are 100% sure the core and lines are clear I think the only other thing it might be is that the passages in the intake manifold may be blocked by corrosion which would entail removing the intake to check and clean although you maybe able to check with a borescope camera if you drain some coolant

Posted

Either Lisle or KD makes a heater flushing attachment for a garden hose that has an air fitting on it to give a blast of air along with the water. I added a water shut off to mine  to save going to the spigot to shut it off

Posted

when you removed the return line from the water pump there should have been no flow from the water pump nipple with the engine running and strong flow from the return line. A defective heater core is a VERY remote possibility BUT if there is good flow the lines would be the same temp so probably not that

Posted

Well I replaced the heater core and lines so that’s already been eliminated and there is good flow coming from the return of the heater core so I am starting to suspect the issue is on the return side

Posted

I have never seen a problem in the water pump but I guess anything is possible. Its not a hard pump to r&r  to check it.  No nipple on the rad I take it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 429 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...