Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I was changing my fluids the other day and noticed I had a leak at the seal between my transfer case and transmission.  Usually, this is indicative of a leaky transfer case input seal or transmission output seal, but could be both.  I will be pulling the transfer case to replace the worn seal(s), but replacing the seals can be a PAIN.  GM recommends inserting a self tapping screw into the transfer case input seal and pulling it out with pliers, but recommends tool J-36825 to replace the transmission output seal, which basically does the same thing as the self tapping screw.

 

Has anybody used the J-36825 tool to replace the input shaft seal on the transfer case?

 

 

Seal Removal.jpg

Oil Leak.jpg

Edited by Gangly
Posted (edited)

In this image there is an actual screw in the seal.  Its hard to believe that is the recommended practice so I'm trying to see if anybody has had any luck with an alternative method.

Seal Removal 2.jpg

 

 

The recommended tool for the transmission output shaft is below.  Im not sure why it cant be used for the transfer case input seal as well.

 

Seal puller.jpg

Edited by Gangly
Added images
  • Gangly changed the title to Transfer Case Leak, Repair Question.
Posted

I have not replaced either of those seals, nor have I used that specific tool. However, I have replaced many seals using that procedure. Some people run a self tapping screw into the seal, I prefer (carefully) drilling a small hole and threading a machine screw into the seal. I put grease on the end of the drill bit to collect any debris. You can feel when you get to the main threads of the screw and there's no sense going further. My slide hammer kit came with an adapter to thread into a standard pair of vise grips. Use a screw that will allow you about an inch sticking out of the seal so you can clamp the vise grips on, then "tap, tap, tap" and it'll pull the seal. I always try just one screw 1st(less debris), if you pull the screw out and the seal stays in, move to a new spot and use 2 screws 180° apart. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, 21guns said:

I have not replaced either of those seals, nor have I used that specific tool. However, I have replaced many seals using that procedure. Some people run a self tapping screw into the seal, I prefer (carefully) drilling a small hole and threading a machine screw into the seal. I put grease on the end of the drill bit to collect any debris. You can feel when you get to the main threads of the screw and there's no sense going further. My slide hammer kit came with an adapter to thread into a standard pair of vise grips. Use a screw that will allow you about an inch sticking out of the seal so you can clamp the vise grips on, then "tap, tap, tap" and it'll pull the seal. I always try just one screw 1st(less debris), if you pull the screw out and the seal stays in, move to a new spot and use 2 screws 180° apart. 

 

This ^

Posted
10 hours ago, 21guns said:

I have not replaced either of those seals, nor have I used that specific tool. However, I have replaced many seals using that procedure. Some people run a self tapping screw into the seal, I prefer (carefully) drilling a small hole and threading a machine screw into the seal. I put grease on the end of the drill bit to collect any debris. You can feel when you get to the main threads of the screw and there's no sense going further. My slide hammer kit came with an adapter to thread into a standard pair of vise grips. Use a screw that will allow you about an inch sticking out of the seal so you can clamp the vise grips on, then "tap, tap, tap" and it'll pull the seal. I always try just one screw 1st(less debris), if you pull the screw out and the seal stays in, move to a new spot and use 2 screws 180° apart. 

I guess it’s a much more commonly accepted solution than I originally thought.  Thanks for the great insight, I appreciate it!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,256 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...