Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, Bryan13 said:

Any idea what they did to get it working the second time?  Just picked mine up from the retrofit work, and button won't turn on, and getting a "service park assist system" message on the driver information center

 

Not sure.  I assume they basically reloaded the update?  That's a wild guess on my part.  But, yes, mine was exactly the same as yours after the first attempt.  No light on the switch.  Now that it's working the switch is light up "on" by default when I start the truck.

Posted

I had my 2022 Sierra 3500 HD retrofitted the other day and the Park Assist is a nice feature.  However I'm fighting with GM because my truck also has U1D , the Trailering App using the K68 Trailer Lighting Module.  In my case, I use a slide in camper mounted in the 8' bed and that turns off the Rear Park Assist.  What is happening is that the K68 module is recognizing the camper as a trailer and turns off Rear Park Assist.  This would make sense if a trailer was behind the truck, but in my case, the camper is not blocking the rear bumper sensors, so the system should work properly.  But I've learned that the K68 module software uses detection of the four lighting circuits (left and right stop/turn, reverse light, and park lights) to detect whether or not I have a trailer.  In the Trailering App is an option to choose Accessory - No Trailer, but it doesn't work.  The module software needs to be fixed so that when a trailer is not present, rear park assist should work as intended.  In my case, rear park assist works perfectly only if I unplug my camper from the truck.  Obviously that isn't OK.

22 GMC.jpg

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I had the park assist chip installed in my 2022 Sierra.  I have been back to the dealership 3 times to get it to work properly and they still cannot do this.  It works maybe 1 in 20 starts of the truck.  The other times, it makes 2 dinging noises, but stays dark.  I am so frustrated with this problem and the dealer telling me "it seems to work fine when we try it."  They have had my truck for days at a time and I'm not giving up.  I've got 8,000 miles on an expensive vehicle, I expect this stuff to work.  Has anybody else had this problem?  I know all about using the info. center to turn it on there (I have, again and again) and I have know the owner's manual by heart on this topic.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...