Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys. I have a 21 AT4 with the 3.0 LM2 motor. I’ve had it a year with just over 30,000 miles and since new I rarely experience a slight coolant smell coming from the engine bay after it’s parked. I’ve read that some say it was the smell after regen and others say they’ve eventually found coolant leaks in different areas. I’m trying to monitor it as much as I can but it definitely smells like coolant. It was a bit low when taking it in yesterday to the dealer so I figured they’d top it off an I would monitor it a few times a week. When reading up on it I also read about the automatic coolant fill and air removal process in the 3.0 supplement. 
 

Is it necessary to run the automatic coolant fill and air removal process every time even a 1/2 inch of coolant is added?  My dealer didn’t even top off the tanks so I’m not happy so when I go back in  I surely do not trust them to do that. 
 

should I do it on my own? 
 

will it hurt anything by doing it if it wasn’t needed or if done too often? 
 

thanks for any help. I’m trying to learn as much about this vehicle as possible. 

Posted

You do not need to do the procedure if just doing a top-up.

If the coolant level is low enough that air may have entered the cooling system it should be done to remove air.

It won't hurt it to do the procedure during top-up. 

 

Regen should not have a coolant smell.

On a new truck, the first few regens may be burning off oil/grease/overspray from the outside of the exhaust.

 

Some LM2's have been had issues with exhaust leaks, but that is a different smell than either coolant or grease/oil burn-off.

 

I'd recommend doing coolant level checks/top-ups on a cold engine. (and of course parked on a consistent slope, preferably flat)

Coolant expands when warmed, so then the question becomes  'how warm was it when checked"?  

 

If it's being checked at as part of an oil change service or when getting fuel -- observing the coolant tanks confirms they still have coolant, but it doesn't give an accurate indication of level.

If you chasing a small/slow leak -- then doing an 'accurate' check more frequently is important.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
    • Glad you had success with it. I did as well, but about 5-6 months later it returned. Tried again, same result. This was after the dealer made several attempts and never even got it to slow down.
    • 3.15 Kroger’s in Montgomery Tx
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...