Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
On 2/9/2024 at 10:07 AM, medic_84 said:

The wheel size has nothing to do with it it is the overall diameter of the tire and wheel set up. You could go from a 17” with a swamper to a 26” with a rubber band around it and theoretically have the same over all diameter combination. 

The stock setup on the truck I have now had a 30.1" diameter with 255/70R17's, while those I have on it now have a 33" diameter with 275/60R20's. Went up 3"  with no changes whatsoever to the truck. No rubbing.

The wheel size does factor in. As does the width and profile of the tire. The 50/60/70/75 etc, is the percentage of the width of the tire that becomes the profile. So all three dimensions factor in.

 

The OP said, "

  • New Member
  •  

I have a 2022 refresh Silverado 5.3 4wd. My stock tire size that came on the truck is 275/60/20. What I would like to do is upgrade to 275/65/20. It is approximately a little over an inch taller than my stock tires. Would I be able to do this without lifting the front "

 

Tire width, and wheel diameter remained the same between both sets.

All he was doing was changing the profile of the tire by 5%, everything else was the same.

His tires had a width of 10.83" on both sets.

The profile of the first set was 6.5"

The profile of the second set was 7.02".

So, his second set was roughly 1.1" taller than the first. Don't think that would matter much

Posted
On 2/13/2024 at 9:20 AM, TrueBlue said:

The stock setup on the truck I have now had a 30.1" diameter with 255/70R17's, while those I have on it now have a 33" diameter with 275/60R20's. Went up 3"  with no changes whatsoever to the truck. No rubbing.

The wheel size does factor in. As does the width and profile of the tire. The 50/60/70/75 etc, is the percentage of the width of the tire that becomes the profile. So all three dimensions factor in.

 

The OP said, "

  • New Member
  •  

I have a 2022 refresh Silverado 5.3 4wd. My stock tire size that came on the truck is 275/60/20. What I would like to do is upgrade to 275/65/20. It is approximately a little over an inch taller than my stock tires. Would I be able to do this without lifting the front "

 

Tire width, and wheel diameter remained the same between both sets.

All he was doing was changing the profile of the tire by 5%, everything else was the same.

His tires had a width of 10.83" on both sets.

The profile of the first set was 6.5"

The profile of the second set was 7.02".

So, his second set was roughly 1.1" taller than the first. Don't think that would matter much

My statement is still true. the diameter of the wheel has nothing to do with the tire size. He said he went from a 17” wheel to a 20” wheel and gained three inches …… the wheel had nothing to do with it. The difference in tire ratios did. I understand completely how aspect ratios work on tires. My statement was also that I went from a stock 275/60R20 (32.99 x 10.99 inches per Goodyear) to a 275/65R20 (34.09x10.98 inches per Nitto) the Nittos are the recon grappler. My stock Slt was lifted 2” in front and had 1/2” wheel spacers on stock 20” Slt wheels and I rubbed the fender liner, leading to it needing to be altered …. So everyone can speculate all they want but I speak from experience I doubt a 275/65 tire will fit a non at4 or trail boss truck with out modifications 

Posted

Actually he said he wanted to go from a 275/60/20 to a 275/65/20. No change in wheel size.

However, to go from a 17" wheel to a 20" wheel does indeed add more height to the diameter. At 1.5" top and bottom. Now you could say that is not the wheel but rather the tire, since you could not mount a 20" tire on a 17" wheel, of course the wheel does factor into the total heighth. Or the tire does, your choice. But one is not possible without the other.

 

Now in his case, when you use the actual tire sizes he provided, as I said by changing the profile by 5% he added a total of 1.1" to his diameter, half on the bottom and half on the top. Pretty much negligible on a truck.

 

In my case by going with a 3" larger wheel and fatter tires I added all of that 3" in diameter. And I had to do nothing to my truck to have them fit, turn, and travel without contacting the hard parts.

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, TrueBlue said:

Actually he said he wanted to go from a 275/60/20 to a 275/65/20. No change in wheel size.

However, to go from a 17" wheel to a 20" wheel does indeed add more height to the diameter. At 1.5" top and bottom. Now you could say that is not the wheel but rather the tire, since you could not mount a 20" tire on a 17" wheel, of course the wheel does factor into the total heighth. Or the tire does, your choice. But one is not possible without the other.

 

Now in his case, when you use the actual tire sizes he provided, as I said by changing the profile by 5% he added a total of 1.1" to his diameter, half on the bottom and half on the top. Pretty much negligible on a truck.

 

In my case by going with a 3" larger wheel and fatter tires I added all of that 3" in diameter. And I had to do nothing to my truck to have them fit, turn, and travel without contacting the hard parts.

I am glad you like speaking to people

like they are idiots.
Yes you went from a 17” to the 20” but the 20” you went to is the stock size he has now. He wants to go bigger. 

Wheel size has NOTHING to do with over all diameter of the tire. Yes you have to have a wheel to mount the tire to but the diameter of that wheel has no bearing on the over all diameter of the tire. The width and aspect ratios are what determine the over all diameter of that tire. Back to statement I made before . Theoretically you could have a 15” rim with a 35x12.50 super swamper on it and a 26” wheel with a super low profile tire and the 26” wheel and tire combo may not be any bigger around than the 15” one. The stock 275/60/20 on the non AT4 and Trailboss trucks have very little wiggle room. I am speaking from experience and even posted pictures of the very tire he wants to put in and listed what I had to do to the truck to have the tires fit and yet you still want to argue with me about it and tell me I am wrong.

Edited by medic_84
Posted

I had no idea you felt like an idiot. If so, it's not my doing, and I had no intent to make you feel like one. But we are definitely not seeing things the same. Maybe I'm the idiot?

 

A 245/60R17 tire and a 245/60R20 tire do not have the same diameter. Both have the same width and profile, however the 20 is going to be taller, (from the ground to the top of the tire), because it has to fit around the 20" wheel. Right?

 

The OP said he wanted to go from a 275/60/20 to a 275/65/20. Same width, same wheel size, profile increases by 5%. No issues in mounting or using on a truck.

Posted
9 hours ago, TrueBlue said:

I had no idea you felt like an idiot. If so, it's not my doing, and I had no intent to make you feel like one. But we are definitely not seeing things the same. Maybe I'm the idiot?

 

A 245/60R17 tire and a 245/60R20 tire do not have the same diameter. Both have the same width and profile, however the 20 is going to be taller, (from the ground to the top of the tire), because it has to fit around the 20" wheel. Right?

 

The OP said he wanted to go from a 275/60/20 to a 275/65/20. Same width, same wheel size, profile increases by 5%. No issues in mounting or using on a truck.

I do not feel like an idiot because I know what I am talking about. You keep speaking to me like I don’t. I know you keep saying it is only a 5% increase but on a non at4 or Trailboss truck it will rub.  The reason the example you gave factors in to the 20” being taller is the width of those tires are 245mm so they would be the same width. The sidewall height would be 147mm (60%) of the width. So yes if you add the 147 mm side wall to a 20” wheel vs a 17” wheel then the 20” wheel and tire would be taller. But your statement of the wheel being the same so it has to fit is not correct. And yes you said you went from a 17” wheel and tire to a 20” wheel and tire which yes was bigger but again is the stock size. If the op had an AT4 which he does then the tire would fit. But on his stock truck it will not fit with out rubbing. 

Posted

Not saying that just because the wheel is the same they have to fit. In his case the wheel size and tire width are equal, but the profile of the setup he's going to is 5% more than his original. His original profile height is 6.48". Where he wants to go is a profile that is 7.04". That equates to .56" taller, top and bottom. Or 1.12" taller, total. Same wheel size before and after, therefore the total increase in the diameter of the tire is 1.12".

My height increase was 3.3", and fits fine. No rubbing, no bottoming out. His would too at one third of that, unless I've missed something. Which is possible. But I don't think so.

Posted
1 hour ago, TrueBlue said:

Not saying that just because the wheel is the same they have to fit. In his case the wheel size and tire width are equal, but the profile of the setup he's going to is 5% more than his original. His original profile height is 6.48". Where he wants to go is a profile that is 7.04". That equates to .56" taller, top and bottom. Or 1.12" taller, total. Same wheel size before and after, therefore the total increase in the diameter of the tire is 1.12".

My height increase was 3.3", and fits fine. No rubbing, no bottoming out. His would too at one third of that, unless I've missed something. Which is possible. But I don't think so.

Yes! You have missed ALOT!!!  You have missed the fact that the 275/60R20 you went to is the stock size he has. Regardless of how much bigger it is than what you had it is still his stock tire. You have also missed that you yourself have said the tire he wants to go to is 1.12” taller or .6” on either side. You have also missed that I put the tire size he wants to put on his truck on my truck and it rubbed. You missed that I had to lift the front of the truck 2” and modify the fender liners to prevent rubbing. Also what you have missed is the 255/70R17 tires you had previously measured 31.09 inches tall and the 275/60R20 you went to measure 32.99 inches tall which is a difference in height of 1.9 inches not the 3 inches you have been claiming. Yes the wheel is 3” bigger but the combo is not. So again I suppose you can continue to argue with me or you can acknowledge you have NOT put the tire size on your truck that he asked about and acknowledge that I may know what I am talking about because I have in fact done the very thing he is asking.

 

Posted

Gotta love this petty fighting.  What garbage!  Wtf do the GMC owners think their answer matters in the first place?  The question is regarding a Silverado.  Yes, mechanically they are the same truck.  Cosmetically they aren't.  Tire sizes are affected by the cosmetic features of these trucks, such as fenders, air dams, wheel well liners, etc.  With all do respect, the GMC owners should stay out of this one.  The Chevy guys have it.  Before you GMC owners get butt hurt about me telling you to sit down I'd like to share some evidence as to why you're wrong.  This is just an example I pulled from a page I have been looking at often lately, but it's all over their website and various other sites too.  There are more examples than just this where the 2 trucks can't use the same size tire.  Straight from ReadyLift's website:

 

https://www.readylift.com/at4-trail-boss-plus-2-0-sst-lift-kit-gm-1500-at4-trail-boss-4wd-2019-2023.html

 

"AT4 - Max tire 305/55-20, 20x9 0 offset wheel

Trail Boss - Max tire 295/65-20, 20x9 0 offset wheel"

305/55r20 = 33.21" diameter, 12" width

295/65r20 = 35.1" diameter, 11.61" width

Posted
11 hours ago, Transient said:

Gotta love this petty fighting.  What garbage!  Wtf do the GMC owners think their answer matters in the first place?  The question is regarding a Silverado.  Yes, mechanically they are the same truck.  Cosmetically they aren't.  Tire sizes are affected by the cosmetic features of these trucks, such as fenders, air dams, wheel well liners, etc.  With all do respect, the GMC owners should stay out of this one.  The Chevy guys have it.  Before you GMC owners get butt hurt about me telling you to sit down I'd like to share some evidence as to why you're wrong.  This is just an example I pulled from a page I have been looking at often lately, but it's all over their website and various other sites too.  There are more examples than just this where the 2 trucks can't use the same size tire.  Straight from ReadyLift's website:

 

https://www.readylift.com/at4-trail-boss-plus-2-0-sst-lift-kit-gm-1500-at4-trail-boss-4wd-2019-2023.html

 

"AT4 - Max tire 305/55-20, 20x9 0 offset wheel

Trail Boss - Max tire 295/65-20, 20x9 0 offset wheel"

305/55r20 = 33.21" diameter, 12" width

295/65r20 = 35.1" diameter, 11.61" width

Not quite garbage and not exactly petty. I will concede that I am a GMC owner and can only speak to my experience. My issues lie with other people’s reasoning as to why they are right bypassing all of the evidence pointing to the statements I have made regarding gmc trucks true…… there was a fella on this post who asked me about a 1.5” lift on his elevation and clearing the tire size in question. Then you have this Trueblue a-hole buts in and spouts all kinda nonsense about going from a 17” to 20” rim and that being a 3” increase in size so it must work…… yada yada yada…… I have never claimed to know about Silverados but I did assume it was close.
For that I apologize!

 

Posted

Not an a-hole. And I still believe what I said to be true. However you were right in that I misstated my own experience, specifically that my tire size increased by 3", when in fact it was as you stated 1.9". Not intentional, just a lapse in memory. But, even at just the 1.9" increase in my case, which went off without a hitch on my truck, why then would the OP who was only going 1.12" on the same model as me, not be able to do the same? Or perhaps my increase had me at the limits of tire size increase, and his would put him over that limit? Not sure, but given that the High Country (as well as Silverados), can come with 22" wheels on it from the factory, I doubt another 1.1" on his truck would require a 2" lift.

Regardless, you should try to avoid the keyboard commando tactics. I've been nothing but polite here, even allowing that I myself was making a mistake on what I was saying, which I was and admitted to. You should do the same. We're all here to learn, and then give back when possible. At least those are my reasons. YMMV

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, TrueBlue said:

Not an a-hole. And I still believe what I said to be true. However you were right in that I misstated my own experience, specifically that my tire size increased by 3", when in fact it was as you stated 1.9". Not intentional, just a lapse in memory. But, even at just the 1.9" increase in my case, which went off without a hitch on my truck, why then would the OP who was only going 1.12" on the same model as me, not be able to do the same? Or perhaps my increase had me at the limits of tire size increase, and his would put him over that limit? Not sure, but given that the High Country (as well as Silverados), can come with 22" wheels on it from the factory, I doubt another 1.1" on his truck would require a 2" lift.

Regardless, you should try to avoid the keyboard commando tactics. I've been nothing but polite here, even allowing that I myself was making a mistake on what I was saying, which I was and admitted to. You should do the same. We're all here to learn, and then give back when possible. At least those are my reasons. YMMV

I have no problem admitting when I am wrong see my above post where I concede not knowing anything about Silverados. What I am not wrong about is my experience with the size of the tire on a GMC and you insisting I am. Also to your logic of the Denali Ultimate 22” wheels and tires must be larger than the SLT because the SLT has 20” rims. Again you are wrong….. which shows how little you understand about tire and wheel sizes and how the wheel has little bearing on the over all tire size. The Denali Ultimate 22” wheel and tire combo has an overall height of 32.83” which actually is smaller than the 275/60R20 on the SLT….. wait what!!!! Say it isn’t so!!! But the wheel is bigger!!! Thank you sir for proving my point for me with your own example!

But your right my mileage may very.

I am not a keyboard commando until people on forums try to tell other people wrong information or unfounded information. Again I did concede that the original op was asking about a Silverado and I have a GMC as Transient pointed out and apparently there may be some differences in body panels that allow for different tire sizes. To that I have no knowledge. 

Edited by medic_84
  • 10 months later...
Posted

So to get back on topic, a 275/60/20 tires will not fit a non-AT4 Sierra 1500 (or a Sierra 1500 with no lift)?

 

I ask because Michelin now makes a Defender LTX M/S2 in 275/65/20 that is a SL/XL load range tire.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
    • How wide are your rims?   Toyo specs 8.5-10.0-11.0 inches. My thought would be rim might be pulling the tire inwards creating a center that is more pronounced.    I also noticed that the spec sheet says max 65psi. So you could be right lowering the pressure to ~40 psi. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...