Jump to content

Repowering a 1990 1/2 ton sub?

arlon

Recommended Posts

arlon New Member

arlon

Posted
Posted

I am interested in repowering a 1990 suburban that currently has a tired 350 (153000 miles). My main interest is in legally (in texas) improving the towing ability of the vehicle. Does anyone know if there is a legal or practicle way to use the 383 ci crate motor in the 90 sub? All info I have found on this motor suggests use in pre emission cars only but it sounds like the perfect motor for what I want to do. If I have to use another 350, what to use to get a little performance boost? Torque and mileage are main concerns. I really don't want to have to pay the gas bill for a big block but want more pulling power than I have now. Can I have my cake and eat it too? I'm on about a $2500 budget for the motor... Any thought appreciated. A new diesel PU would be nice but I have a near perfect old sub that could be rebuilt from the ground up for about the down payment and TTL on a new

one. I am also very mechanically capable.. Thanks for any input/ideas..

intruder217 Enthusiast

intruder217

Posted
Posted

There is more to towing than just a more powerful engine. Generally when you add a tow package to a vehicle you get additional cooling for engine oil and transmission, bigger brakes, and lower gearing. You might be quite happy if you put a fresh 350 in there and just lower your rear axle ratio. If the truck is 4wd this is probably not a good solution, as you would be messing with two gear sets.

OUMike Senior Enthusiast

OUMike

Posted
Posted
If I have to use another 350, what to use to get a little performance boost?

GM Crate 350s are built proof. I think you'd be extremely surprised how much stronger your motor would be after a solid rebuild. Maybe replace a few viatal parts such as camshaft, valves, springs and such. Maybe have the crankshaft worked over. I believe that the crank shaft is something that can be reused, but I would emagine a new one would be fairly inexpensive. Maybe have your block bored to 383 and use a similar compression piston. If your concerned about fuel mileage I would highly recommend pulling your TB intake and converting to and a newer EFI system. I would say that for $3500 you could easily rebuild your motor and get power, torque and decent gas mileage. You can't be too picky about mileage, as Subs don't really get good mileage to begin with.

 

You might be quite happy if you put a fresh 350 in there and just lower your rear axle ratio.

 

This is also a good solution. If you decide to go with a new crate motor, check with Lingenfelter Performance (www.lingenfelter.com). John built the best crate motors in the world, and knew more about GM motors than anyone I'd ever talk to. It might be a little more than you want to spend, but it will last forever. Was truly a sad day when Mr. Lingenfelter past away. Changing your gear ratio is a decent approach, but many people don't like dealing with problems caused by this. When you do this you change all your gaugues making them inaccurate (less than they already were :cheers: ), and by going with a higher ratio (3.83, 4.09) you will definatly hurt your vehicles fuel efficiency. Something that you might not wanna do on something heavy already.

 

Hope this helps.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      Well if you insist.
    • diyer2
      OCI, not when but why?

      By diyer2 · Posted

      You have to have the last word. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am sure that was quite the pass experience and not a great place to experience during the winter when the conditions are not good. I've seen video of that pass and also more detailed information and pictures about the wrecks at that one hair pin turn where tractor trailers have flown right off the cliff and I am sure from all the warning signs that you know the exact curve that was !. After all there is a reason why a song was made about Wolf Creek Pass !. By the way and I didn't realize this either when I bought my truck as its nothing I even thought of that would be programmed into the cruise control and this occurs in either the basic or the more advanced cruise that controls your distance behind a vehicle and that is the brakes going down a hill are being applied as soon as the vehicle goes a certain speed over the set cruise speed. While it certainly does force downshifts in the transmission as you found out with cruise on while going down hill, its also dragging the brakes as needed to keep the speed controlled to what the cruise was set to. For me, I find that unsettling simply because I have no concept then as to how MUCH brake input is being used a and just how hot are those brakes getting and the wear factor as well. I can see that system getting a person into trouble on long mountain grades while pulling a trailer as it would not only be standing on the brakes of the pickup without any driver input, it would also be automatically applying the trailer brakes and it could cause a run away unit by overheating the brakes. Its one thing on a shorter hill and if the driver allows it to do its thing but on a long mountain grade is where things could get so out of hand. As someone a while back on this forum said, they had someone following them at night I believe on a down grade and had the cruise set and the person behind them could see the brake lights being energized all the way down the hill. I figured when I saw your comment that you didn't know and would have no way of knowing that your truck was applying the brakes and that you would and rightfully so assume you only used the brakes when you pressed on the pedal to slow down more than the cruise set speed for the slower sharp curves. So its good knowledge to know this about the newer GM trucks, certainly when doing any descending on long mountain grades. In the future try kicking off the cruise and use the the manual mode on a pass to see what that is like as I know myself when I first experienced it I thought no way can this engine be holding me back this well and tried the same hill in manual mode and sure enough the engine was revving way up and still could not hold the trucks speed down like it could in cruise mode.    Fuel mileage, that is where a really low sleek type of car can do better at higher speeds, certainly it starts sucking fuel too but a tall pickup is pushing massive amounts of air and also allowing a lot more air under it and the tow mirrors as in elephant ears pushing through the wind  as well. Driving like grandpa is about as good as one can do when driving one of these if trying to get the best fuel economy they can. I bet these trucks would get the best mileage they can if driven on a freeway in Florida if not busy traffic at a sedate speed and that sea level elevation without hills, vastly different then Colorado !. 
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It’s over for almost 24 hours. Are you playing Eddie Haskell? 
    • diyer2
      OCI, not when but why?

      By diyer2 · Posted

      Again, really you two.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...