Jump to content

Building sub box


Recommended Posts

Posted

Who here can help an idiot out. :eek:

 

I dont want to pay for a program,

& I want to be able to do it by myself. :flag:

 

How does one go about figuring the size of box needed for

different size subs??

 

TIA,

 

- Cam

Posted

you get the recommended size for your particular sub. then you draw up a diagram on paper. you mulitiply length x width x height then divide by 1728, that gives you cubic feet. just dont forget to subtract the thickness of the wood too, usually 3/4 MDF is what you use to build a box. you're wanting INSIDE measurements, if you use the outside ones you're numbers wont be right

Posted

1728 is how many square inches there are in 1 cu. ft. take 12 (height) x 12 (width) x 12 (depth) and you get 1728, and that is exactly 1 cu. ft. so in order to convert from square inches to cu. ft. you need to divide by that number :lol:

Posted

:seeya: for the formula!

Now what if the height is uneven?

One side is higher than the other?

What's the formula for that?

Thanks.

Posted

Thinking about making a box to fit under the rear seat of my Suburban.

The space gets taller towards the front.

It should have more volume if I make one side taller than the other.

I'm sure somebody has done it already.

Posted

I assume that you are making a tapered box. Think of it as being made up of a two parts - a cube and a triangular section. The volume of the cube is as stated above - h x b1 x d. The volume of the triangular section is 1/2 x base (b2) x height x depth.

 

Add them together - make allowances for the depth of the mdf.

 

 

            ------------------------         /                             /\       /                             /    \   d/                             /        \   /                             /            \ /                             /                \           /          b1                /                    \------------------------                       \|                            |\                       \|                            |  \                       \|                            |    \                     /|                            |      \                  /|                         h |        \              /|                            |          \          /d|                            |            \       /|                            |              \   /|                            |                \/|----------------------------------------                            |         b2     |

 

My asci art sucks :seeya:

Posted
Now what if the height is uneven?

One side is higher than the other?

What's the formula for that?

the tapered box is an easier design than I think what you're asking for. If it's your first box, I'd go with this design

 

 

But if you want I can figure out a formula for this box you've described.

 

Give me a little bit of time and I'll get back to you

Posted

actually, give me some measurements and I can give you the specs for your "sealed" box. I can't design you a wedge-type ported box. Too complicated.

Posted

maximum measurements:

 

height(rear)= 5"

height(front)= 7.5"

length(side to side)= 16"

width(front to rear)= 14.5

 

:puke:

Posted

that is going to be a tiny, tiny box. it's going to have an internal volume of .52 cu.ft. (actually it came out to .5181568 cu.ft., but for the sake of argument we rounded up to .52)

 

and that's not even counting the volume you're speaker is going to take up. so you're going to need to find a speaker that will be happy with less than .52 cu.ft. probably going to be a 10 at the biggest, more than likely an 8".

 

oh yeah, that number is assuming you're using 3/4" material (MDF or HDF is the best all around)

Posted

you can get a little bit more volume if you can find 5/8" MDF board, but don't be confused, it's NOT particle board

 

Go with maroon's calculation, and put an 8", or maybe 2-8" back there, or find a low volume 10" sub

 

search around crutchfield.com for the volumes of certain subs.

Posted

yeah, you could probably get by using 5/8" since it's going to be a smaller sub and you probably wont have more than about 300 watts rms to it. i always use 3/4" because i have a tad bit more power and bigger subs than that :puke:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,972
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Whit.the.COB
    Newest Member
    Whit.the.COB
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 471 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Even tougher is the 5.0 / 302. That's what this one has.    https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   https://postimg.cc/4n3F3yzY   Just realized I had the airbox removed in the engine pic, lol.
    • Yep! This should be a pin somewhere as @pgamboa really dives into all of this. Thanks for reposting the link!
    • I did the new thermostat after doing a 'flip' for a year. Runs as cool one way as the other in the summer but in the winter there is a bit of a floor. Yellow with the new 70 C thermostat. My data over the life of the unit to date. Still need more cooler. Anyway that floor helped both winter fuel economy and shift quality in the winter. I found it a good balance.       
    • Evan Williams Bottled in Bond   So pouring the last of a bottle of Evan Williams Black label last night I set off the the state store for a refill only to be denied the by an empty shelf. Rats.    What the did have was a bottle of Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. 100 proof. Hum, a few bucks more but a known distiller. Lets have a swing at it. ( I have before )    Cracked it open and pour a serving over ice. Hum.... more heat, yes. More alcohol naturally. But the barreling not the proof brings the taste and this one came up short.    Oh is was familiar but the heat ran the barrel over like a Peterbilt runs over a squirrel. Could use a heavier toasting of the oak me thinks or perhaps a longer barreling. Who knows. But what I can say is ice or a water back isn't the answer. What kills one kills them both. Sad. It is a pleasant drink....if you have little to compare it to.  
    • I've had exactly one set of Bridgestone. Lasted five year and 125,000 miles and had I known better 15oK would have been a cake walk. I would have bought a like set had they not tripled in price since the first set. I removed them at said mileage with 5/32" remaining in dead even wear all four. They were fuel efficient, quite, comfortable and predictable.    Early on I got a very good alignment checked at least once a year, sometimes twice; kept the tires properly inflated, balanced and rotated. And I've found that many a tire issue can be avoided with great maintenance practices. Lot's of tire dealers will do rotation and balance (simple) for free for as long as you own the tire they sold you so no excuse not to.    Bead prep, alloy integrity and stem health have a huge impact on inflation stability. There are more mountings done poorly that perfectly. Finding a good tire guy is gold and as important as finding a tire you like.    That 3X price increase now two sets of "other tires' later is starting look like a bargain.      Bad maintenance kills more tires than bad tires. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...