Jump to content

Solid Axle HD

blakrapter

Recommended Posts

blakrapter Enthusiast

blakrapter

Posted
Posted

Hear a rumor that GM may be putting a solid axle on its 4wd HDs soon. Anyone have any info on this? IFS rides good, but ford and dodge have gm beat for heavy duty and/or offroad axles. I hate the cv joints. If they put a solid axle on one, it will seal the deal. No way I would ever consider anything but a 2500HD

snoman Senior Enthusiast

snoman

Posted
Posted

I have not heard but it seems that solid front axles made it into some of the K3500's for the first few years the OBS was made. I recall seeing a few on lots back then and my 89 GM service manual that covers burbs and blazers and OBS truck has repair info for a D60 front axle and those axles where never used in a burb or a blazer.

Chevyfreek Enthusiast

Chevyfreek

Posted
Posted

I have not heard anything about this at all. I don't see GM doing this, but anything is possible. GM has had IFS for more than a decade now and the chances of them bringing the SFA back is probably rare. If they did bring it back I could see it used on the 2500HD and 3500 Silverados. The 1/2 tons would and possibly the 2500 LD's would stay IFS sense both Dodge and Ford are running IFS in their light duty trucks. There is no doubt that IFS provides better handling characteristics and that is why they are more widely used. I could see there being a market though for the return of the SFA...

snoman Senior Enthusiast

snoman

Posted
Posted

I would say the posibilty does exist anyway because AA is now suppling front drive axles for Dodge diesels (since 2004 models) that are beefier than a D60, especailly in the ball joint area so there are off the shelf parts out there so to speak.

robsawatsky Enthusiast

robsawatsky

Posted
Posted

GM used to have a front solid axle 4x4 available in the OBS 3500HD (not the same beast as the current 2500HD/3500 line), which were mostly Chassis Cab and I believe some Crew Cabs. The only thing I could see being offered now with a front solid axle is if they decide to factory produce a 4x4 4500 series.

snoman Senior Enthusiast

snoman

Posted
Posted
GM used to have a front solid axle 4x4 available in the OBS 3500HD (not the same beast as the current 2500HD/3500 line), which were mostly Chassis Cab and I believe some Crew Cabs. The only thing I could see being offered now with a front solid axle is if they decide to factory produce a 4x4 4500 series.

I am not so sure, that Duramax is heavy and it puts a lot of strain on IFS ball joints and tierod ends especailly if a plow is attached too. It really should almost be included with a diesel.

Hecktorx Enthusiast

Hecktorx

Posted
Posted
I have not heard but it seems that solid front axles made it into some of the K3500's for the first few years the OBS was made. I recall seeing a few on lots back then and my 89 GM service manual that covers burbs and blazers and OBS truck has repair info for a D60 front axle and those axles where never used in a burb or a blazer.

 

They didn't change the body style for the crew cabs until 91. So you could get a 88-91 k-3500 CC with a solid axle but it was still the old, old body style. Similar to what the Blazers and Subs. were.

 

 

 

GM used to have a front solid axle 4x4 available in the OBS 3500HD (not the same beast as the current 2500HD/3500 line), which were mostly Chassis Cab and I believe some Crew Cabs. The only thing I could see being offered now with a front solid axle is if they decide to factory produce a 4x4 4500 series.

 

They did have a solid axle, but never offered it in a 4x4. There was a dealer somewhere in the U.S. that offered it as a dealer installed option.

 

Now I'm trying to start a discussion here, not a fight. But the people who think a SFA axle is better, please tell me why you think that. Are there failure statistics out there that prove the SFA is better? Are they really stronger?

 

I don't have the answers either, but Ford has had changes in there front ends because of parts failures(I'm refering to them dropping the Dana 50 and the bearing problems they were having) and now Dodge is doing the same. As far as I know, the GMs are still the way they were introduced. (Please correct me if I'm wrong). What do you guys think? And please share what facts you know that support your opinion.

blakrapter Enthusiast

blakrapter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the replies guys. Keep them coming.

 

There are a few reasons I prefer the solid axle (handling isnt one of them)

 

1. Better articulation for offroad use - This is cool and more important to serious offroaders than me, but I like the option.

 

2. More travel (part of more articulation). CV and ball joints bind = bad

 

3. Most important to me, I want to modify it to lower when parked for wheelchair access. It has to lower ~9" and that is much much more easily achieved with a solid axle design than IFS due to ball joint and cv joint misalignment.

Charlie in TX Enthusiast

Charlie in TX

Posted
Posted

hectorx, I'm with ya. Why take a step backwards to a SFA. The only times I see an advantage to the STA is highly modified motors, high lifted trucks or snowplowing. For the other 99% of us IFS is better.

 

Further, what is the problem with having a varity to choose from? If you wan't SFA get a Ford or Dodge, if you want IFS get a GM.

bigdogs Senior Enthusiast

bigdogs

Posted
Posted
The only thing I could see being offered now with a front solid axle is if they decide to factory produce a 4x4 4500 series.

They are supposed to have a 4x4 4500 series later this year according to my dealer. They have a 2WD on their lot and I asked if they were coming with 4WD and he said later this year. I would hope that if they put one on there they go bigger than a Dana 60 being they are using a bigger (heavier) Duramax. American makes both a 10.5 (7000lb) and 13.8" (11000lb) units. Rockwell makes some beffy stuff too. (seen a few 2.5ton units on some jacked up street trucks)

Bad Bowtie Enthusiast

Bad Bowtie

Posted
Posted

I wish i wish i can share the gossip about GM but what you see atop is a possiblity ( :D ) for the 2500HD and the 3500 Duallies and SRW. GM is about surprises unlike Ford and Dodge they show before and after there release there product line. :thumbs:

snoman Senior Enthusiast

snoman

Posted
Posted
I have not heard but it seems that solid front axles made it into some of the K3500's for the first few years the OBS was made. I recall seeing a few on lots back then and my 89 GM service manual that covers burbs and blazers and OBS truck has repair info for a D60 front axle and those axles where never used in a burb or a blazer.

 

They didn't change the body style for the crew cabs until 91. So you could get a 88-91 k-3500 CC with a solid axle but it was still the old, old body style. Similar to what the Blazers and Subs. were.

 

 

 

GM used to have a front solid axle 4x4 available in the OBS 3500HD (not the same beast as the current 2500HD/3500 line), which were mostly Chassis Cab and I believe some Crew Cabs. The only thing I could see being offered now with a front solid axle is if they decide to factory produce a 4x4 4500 series.
They did have a solid axle, but never offered it in a 4x4. There was a dealer somewhere in the U.S. that offered it as a dealer installed option.

 

Now I'm trying to start a discussion here, not a fight. But the people who think a SFA axle is better, please tell me why you think that. Are there failure statistics out there that prove the SFA is better? Are they really stronger?

 

I don't have the answers either, but Ford has had changes in there front ends because of parts failures(I'm refering to them dropping the Dana 50 and the bearing problems they were having) and now Dodge is doing the same. As far as I know, the GMs are still the way they were introduced. (Please correct me if I'm wrong). What do you guys think? And please share what facts you know that support your opinion.

But I DO remember seeing a few on dealer lots with with solid axle under OBS trucks (88 to 99) and that is why it caught my eye in very early 90's as I thought that they only came with IFS too. I wish I had looked closer at them and read window stickers.

snoman Senior Enthusiast

snoman

Posted
Posted
hectorx, I'm with ya. Why take a step backwards to a SFA. The only times I see an advantage to the STA is highly modified motors, high lifted trucks or snowplowing. For the other 99% of us IFS is better.

 

Further, what is the problem with having a varity to choose from? If you wan't SFA get a Ford or Dodge, if you want IFS get a GM.

Actually, I kinda prefer IFS for plowing having used one for 5 years now because you do not get the ujoint kickback in a tight turn under power pushing snow. I just have resevations about it longivity. I have a 79 J20 that carried a plow for many years untillretired last year (I plan to restore it sometime) and the 44HD in it is still reasonably tight.

wolfie Enthusiast

wolfie

Posted
Posted

I plowed snow with my 89 right up until I got the 2002. When I first got the 89 they had a problem with the ball joints which they promptly replaced and gave me a 5 year 100,000 mile waranty on the new ones. Since then I tore a couple of boots but have never had an axle failure of any kind. On the 2002 I already have over 50,000 trouble free miles and expect many more. I wouldn't want to go back to plowing with a SFA.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      $5.19 for regular...
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      My office is slowly filling with Blazer parts. Getting ready to do the big bang of repairs. Intake (second time), water pump, radiator, hoses, and I'm going to re-seal the timing cover where someone went hog wild with silicone. Might as well, because I don't think that's done right.   There's a local tow yard that I didn't realize also has quite the inventory of junk vehicles. This is an old school junkyard. No waivers. Cash only, you were never here if anyone asks. Don't piss off the owner, or you'll end up in the back of one of those cars, headed for the shredder. And if you see something, don't snitch. Cars stacked double high, wasps nests, trip hazards and junk everywhere. I found a few little odds/ends for my Blazer. The $20 I spent was worth the experience alone. But I was never there. What yard?   I officially love/hate this truck. It's so out of my wheelhouse, roughest vehicle I've ever owned. Every. single. repair. -is so hard-fought, everything that can go wrong, goes wrong. Currently in a hate phase, and kind of wish I was closer to sending it down the road with a lucky new owner, to be honest. Preparing for the day when I tear into this thing...lots of pre-funk with Ibuprofen.   Rock Auto sent me a bad reman rear wiper motor. It was a bear to install. The tailgate in these things has about eleventy-billion fastners and pieces and things that need to be uninstalled/moved just to access the shoddy rear wiper motor. The casing on mine was cracked clean through, btw. Nice, GM, nice. SO I got this new motor installed, hit the switch, I see it wig-wag (without the arm installed) and think I'm golden. Reassemble everything. With the wiper arm installed I gave it one final test. Time to clean up and take the other half out to dinner, collect a paycheck, right?   Nope. I hear the plastic worm gear stripping as the arm hung up. Just like my broken motor. Weak/old and shredding itself internally. I can assist the arm and the range of motion is normal, and it parks correctly. It just doesn't have the poop to actually sweep the arm with a blade on it. Oh, hell. Turned the key off and shut the shop door behind me. I get to do that over again, too.
    • BlueV8
      AFM Disabler Question

      By BlueV8 · Posted

      A complete delete is the most thorough mechanical solution, but it is also major engine work. On a quiet truck that is still under extended warranty, opening the engine purely as prevention is difficult to justify. A plug-in disabler stops commanded cylinder deactivation, but it does not remove or repair the collapsible lifters, so it should not be treated as failure insurance. I would keep the oil full, document the maintenance, and have any persistent tick, misfire, or loss of power diagnosed promptly. If the engine eventually has to come apart, that is the logical time to compare an OEM-style repair with a complete delete. The right choice depends on the truck’s symptoms, warranty status, expected ownership period, and whether the engine already needs to be opened. We explain that decision in more detail here—full disclosure, this is our own guide: https://www.bluev8.com/blogs/news/do-you-actually-need-an-afm-disabler   One exception: some 2021 L82/L84 trucks have RPO YK9, meaning cylinder deactivation was already disabled in the factory ECM; on those trucks a plug-in disabler is redundant, although the AFM/DFM hardware remains inside the engine.
    • mark249
      Help purchasing a touch screen digitizer

      By mark249 · Posted

      Brought my 2015 Colorado into the dealership to check my touch screen issues, had that ghost touch thing happening. They said I needed a new touch screen and they could either order me one for $500. The lady at the service deck was nice enough to tell me I could order a touch screen online for less, she did stipulate that the touch screen had to be factory OEM, you can't pair an aftermarket screen to my radio seeing it was 2015, it had to be a GM factory OEM only. I found a few on Amazon and Ebay by the numbers on the back of the old screen, DJ080PA-01A GM# 22740886, Some said "OEM" in the description and others just said "Replacement". Would a replacement be the same as a OEM as long as it had the same numbers on the back of the screen? In some of the descriptions they also show different brand names but same numbers, is that an issue?  
    • Donstar
      Navigating senior years.

      By Donstar · Posted

      I have both but typically use the 4 legged walker (wheels on front, ski's on back).   The four wheeler is starting to be used on "longer" outdoor walks.  The 4 legged walker is particularly helpful in practicing good walking posture.  Both of my knees are at different stages of recovery and I'm trying to not develop poor habits.  I can actually manage with a cane but it's very difficult not to favor one leg over the other.  My PT recommends I continue with my 4 legged walker for a while.  Yesterday was four weeks since my last knee replacement and I'm excited about my progress to date.  It has been a hell of a rough journey so far but it is exciting to witness  systematic and continuous improvement.  I went for years watching the decline of my "mobility".  It seems that everyday now I am alerting my wife to something I can do now that I couldn't a day or two ago!  I encourage anyone facing the prospect of knee replacement to share any concerns with others who have had the surgery.  It isn't an instant fix but rather is a considerable amount of short term pain for long term gain.  Recovery time and pain levels vary for individuals post surgery but the end results are typically very positive and I've never encountered anyone regretting having had the surgery. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...