Jump to content

GMAC Insurance


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just got a "flyer" in the mail yesterday for GMAC insurance on my Sierra. One thing that stood out is they use only factory parts and on new trucks pay replacement value not cash value (not sure what they do after it's a year old). Anyway does anyone have GMAC on their trucks? If so how do you like it?

 

Thanks

Posted
I just got a "flyer" in the mail yesterday for GMAC insurance on my Sierra. ....

 

 

 

Actually a good question. I used State Farm because they have been a good advocate for me, and basically, addressed all of my concerns. But, GMAC could be advantageous, especially if you are using a GMAC loan. Anyway, try this URL:

 

http://www.business.com/search/rslt_defaul...+service+review

Posted

Thanks I will take a look at that WWW page. They also mentioned they gave a discount (forgot the amount) for Onstar as well. I need to see if they also insure ATVs as well since I have my Sportsman on with my Sierra.

Posted

I use State Farm too, they are good on prices for me, got a clean record. I got hit by a motorcycle right after I bought my truck. The body shop I took it to did a sub par job fixing the truck, so I complained to State Farm and they got my truck fixed to my standards with no hassle. They fought with the body shop for me and everything. Just a thought for ya, and the GMAC stuff seemed high to me when I bought ther truck.

Posted

I've had too many bad experiences with State Farm. :jester: I now have GMAC. Been with them for a couple years now. Pretty happy with them so far. Before that I was with Progressive for 6 years. From my experience, they were true to thier name. The progressively raised their rates every year. :lurk: Sad thing was I hadn't had any accidents, tickets or claims during that time. When I quoted GMAC, they were about 1/2 the price of Progressive. Switching was a no-brainer.

Posted

Thanks carguru... have you had to file any claims with them yet, if so any problems? I liked how they say only factory parts are used in repairs plus they will give a discount for my Onstar. Do you know if they also cover ATVs as well?

Posted
One thing that stood out is they use only factory parts

Are they new parts or harvested old parts. Didn't Ford get caught a while back when using the Greenleaf (sp?) network to obtain Ford salvage parts for which customers were charged full value?

Posted

Well, State Farm has indeed been good for me, but that means NOTHING as far as recommending them or anything. Start Farm is only good as its agent. The agent in this town is honestly good. Been very pleased with her.

 

I really feel this is basically true with all the insurance carriers.

Posted

I have yet to make any claim with them yet. I have heard that GMAC is pretty good from someone else that is with them. Out of the 6 years with Progressive, I filed one claim, but never really used it because it was found that the dealership was liable for the damage (that is another wonderful story :lurk: ). The bad thing was they jacked my rates up every payment time. By the time I ditched them, I was paying $400 more per year with no claims.

 

With State Farm, my family used to use State Farm. The agents were pretty decent. However, State Farm was pretty bad when it came to claims. We had a car that was financed (meaning that it was full coverage, plus we had low deductibles) that was destroyed by a falling tree. At first, State Farm told us that it was not covered, once that was resolved, they said that they wanted to repair the car (car was pretty much cut in half by the tree), then after the claim, they decided they did not want our business anymore (after 20 years with them with only a couple of windshield claims over the period). :jester: To her credit, the agent fought for us during this entire time. My family still buys insurance from this agent, but different carrier.

Posted

I guess that is true you need a good agent, but they can only do so much if the parent company says "no" there is not a lot they can do about it. Thankfully I have not had to "use" my insurance so don't really know how good my current one is when push comes to shove. I still find it amazing that you are buying something (insurance) and then when you use it (claims) they either raise your rates or cancel you. :fume:

Posted

As I mentioned earlier, State Farm has been very efficient for me, due to the local agent. Car issues have always been resolved very quickly with a follow-up form given regarding the quality of the repair and insurance service.

 

The following tree in the earlier message brought up another issue that I had. My mother ran into my truck with the tractor. Not a hard hit, but it did cost $640 in damage. HER State Farm used the Home Owners Insurance to pay for the damage on my truck. That's a new one .....

Posted

Interesting.... I've heard of an auto insurance going after a home owner's to collect money (like a tree falls on the car) but not sure how they group the tractor into it.. My ATV is carried by the same company that covers my truck but considered a seperate policy. I found out that GMAC does not insure ATVs tho, so have to still think about them

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 37's would probably fit with a 3" lift. GM only has two gear ratios for these trucks 3.73 for gas and 3.42 for diesel. And they can't be programmed for anything else at the moment. The rough country module just corrects the speedometer and odometer to adjust for tire size it's not a programming device.   You haven't said if your truck is gas or diesel, but for a gas truck the 10L1000 with 3.73 gears has a lower final drive ratio than the 6L90 it replaced would if it were swapped to 4.10s. GM used the same 3.73 gearing in 6 speed gas trucks. I don't think you'll have any issue running 37's with the 10 speed other than the reduction in mpg and towing/weight capacity which is as much of a function of the lift as the tire size.
    • Actually, it probably was the brakes.  It's weird the way the messages came across, but I took it to the dealer thinking that something was wrong with the sensor and in fact, the rear brakes were shot.  What I don't understand is why the messages never said, your brake pads are low.  First I got the message I posted above, taking about new pads being detected.  Then I got a message saying that the system needed repaired.  It never said, change your brake pads.
    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...