Jump to content

285 or 265


Recommended Posts

Posted

i cant decide between staying w/265's or going to 285's. i do no off-roading, mostly city/highway.   265's of course are cheaper which is good (saving for a big screen tv!). any advise? oh, thinking about going w/ pirelli a/t.

Posted

285's look really good, but I love my big screen TV too...  If you go with 285's you may want to get your speedo recalibrated.

 

Another tire that I have run in the past and thought was great was the Cooper Discoverer AT.  It's a little more aggressive (and slightly noisier) than stock, but get's great traction in snow and rain.

Posted

I just got new 285 Brigstones Duleler AT's last week. I have to say it's the best thing I have ever done to my truck. The truck finially rides good since I got rid of those ####$y firestones. As for the speedo, I found it was off my 3 or 4 mph after 70 mph. Meaning when I going 70mph, I was actually going about 73 or 74, not a big deal

Posted

I personally would go with some LT rated 265's.  I do agree that the 285's may look a little better, but they are just too wide for my tastes.  If you live in an area where you get alot of snow, you will probably be better off with the narrower tire.  Either way you go, it will be better then the stock tires.   :D

Posted

I have 285's (for over 12K miles now) with no lift and no problems

Posted

This is a little bit off this topic but I heard that all of the Firestone AT's have been recalled. My 2001 Silverado came with them and the dealer said not to worry. The are not the same as those on the Fords. Anyone heard anything about it? ???

Posted

i have a z-71 with 285 BFG A/T's on it and had no problem at all.  the only thing that you might have to do is crank the torsion bars a couple turns (if your front end sits particularly low from the factory).  if you do that, get it aligned.

if you do a search for torsion bars or even for 285's, you'll get lots and lots of information!

that was among my very favorite upgrades.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My brother has an Escalade. The warranty has expired so he told his wife to go to the Valvoline quick lube he uses some times. They told her if her car was a 2020 and newer 6.2 engine they wouldn’t touch it. Hers is a 2019, so they did the oil change.
    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...