Jump to content

"Those People"


DARKWAV

Recommended Posts

Posted

Add one 2002 4WD GMC Sierra 2500HD SLT SB (6.0/4.10) to the driveway! This thing looks like a brand new vehicle, only 12900 miles, fully loaded. Paid $500 over what Edmunds.com recommended. It was a no-pressure sale. No regrets about what we paid (27.5K at a Toyta/Scion dealership for something that is virtually comparable to the 37-40K 2005 truck in the GMC dealership next door). Best customer service I have ever had at a dealership.

 

This thing must have been someone’s toy-hauler. Only signs of use I have seen so far include beach (or possible desert) sand under the bedliner (thinking about replacing the bedliner with spray-in…time to use the Search function), and a small ding on a frame cross member under the drivers door. Condition of the paint and frame indicate this thing was garaged.

 

2500HD is way more truck than we were planning to get, but we could not pass this up. It meets the basic minimum requirements of a Silverado/Sierra 4WD Crew Cab. It is my wife’s first color choice, and she also happened to prefer the Sierras over the Silverado when we were checking out new vehicles at the auto show several weeks ago. It will be her daily driver.

 

Something like a Z-71 Colorado Crew would have been a sensible choice, but she wanted more interior room. Avalanche was on her list for the last couple years, but the bed was on the small side and she didn’t like the access to it. So, a Z-71 1500 Crew Cab seemed to be the best fit without being too far over the top. However, as far as used 4WD CC go, it seems like there are more 2500HDs available than 1500s. There were some 40-50K mile 2001 2500HD (6.0 LS/SLE) for around $19-23K, a few 20K mile 1500 LS 2004 around $25K, but the best options to date has been this SLT and a 2004 18K mile white Silverado LS Z71 advertised at $30K.

 

We are now officially “Those People.”

 

I think we fit the Nissan Titan demographic, both work, live a few miles outside of downtown. Even worse, the 17.5 ft boat we will be “hauling” with this truck…is actually a canoe.

 

3/4 Ton Truck to transport a canoe.

 

Somehow that seems so wrong.

 

At least my wife is a civil engineer. She does visit worksites (new developments, watershed areas, storm drainage channels) several times a month.

 

I can feel better knowing she is safer in that truck than her no-airbag restraint 94 S-10.

 

I will no longer be tempted to take the Impala out on a long drive to the desert for hiking when the last couple miles of the trip are on rutted desert roads (with Border Patrol riding my a$$ … what looks so suspicious about an Impala out in the middle of the desert anyway?).

 

impala_tecote1.jpg

 

We can finally drive out to those trailheads at the far end of roads marked for 4WD vehicles (did this a few times in the 2WD S-10, but drove in with our rock-crawling, big-tire, 4.56 geared, winch-equipped Jeep friends).

 

So what if we are now “those people” … having a wife that drives a bad-a$$ truck makes up for it! The real downside to this situation is that the truck makes my “Big-Bad-Black” 96 Impala SS look like a sport compact.

 

Grrrrr. :(

 

 

2002sierra2500hd.jpg

Posted

That's a slick Impala man :seeya:

 

And everybody gets groceries man. Who cares what hauls them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well...Everybody but me. I eat Taco Bell 4 times a day. :chevy:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...