Jump to content

2006 SS Trailblazer


jerneedog

Recommended Posts

Posted
A friend at work sent me this link to some pics of the 2006 SS Trailblazer.

 

 

 

I skimmed the boards in here real quick...didn't see a post about this on the first page...sorry

if it has been posted already.

 

 

 

 

Sad that GM puts the LS2 in the Trailblazer but won'tput it in the SS Silverado...

Posted

No offense to you TB owners, but this is the first TB / Envoy that doesn't look tippy. I'dllconsider one of these when it is GMS eligible.

Posted

Don't complain or they'll pull the LS2 and go back the the LS1. From prior vehicles the most common reason GM doesn't put bigger engines in some of the cars and trucks is to avoid stepping on sales of their even higher line / (supposedly) higher performance vehicles. Example- last generation Malibu had a 3100 available as the largest engine choice, mainly to keep from stepping on the 3400 / 3800 of the Monte Carlo / Impala situated just upstream and weighing more. That was despite the fact that the Malibu really should have had another larger engine as an option to better compete with the other brands in its own segment.

 

Another example- Avalanche vs. Escalade EXT 1/2 tons. Ave gets 5.3l max, Esc gets the 6.0l hi-po.

 

In the case of the TB I DON'T want them to hold back because they held back on it's big brother truck. It'd be nice if they moved up for the truck now, but if not, big deal (at this point). Good work on the Trailblazer, at least! :D

Posted

I love the truck and both its performance and towing capablity, however the 2006 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 will have the potential to kick the crap out of it on the drag strip, not to mention it will have a 5 Speed auto and AWD as well.

Posted
Don't complain or they'll pull the LS2 and go back the the LS1.  From prior vehicles the most common reason GM doesn't put bigger engines in some of the cars and trucks is to avoid stepping on sales of their even higher line / (supposedly) higher performance vehicles.  Example- last generation Malibu had a 3100 available as the largest engine choice, mainly to keep from stepping on the 3400 / 3800 of the Monte Carlo / Impala situated just upstream and weighing more.  That was despite the fact that the Malibu really should have had another larger engine as an option to better compete with the other brands in its own segment.

 

Another example- Avalanche vs. Escalade EXT  1/2 tons.  Ave gets 5.3l max, Esc gets the 6.0l hi-po.

 

In the case of the TB I DON'T want them to hold back because they held back on it's big brother truck.  It'd be nice if they moved up for the truck now, but if not, big deal (at this point).  Good work on the Trailblazer, at least! :D

 

 

 

 

I am not complaining about the SS TB, I really think it is one of the few SS's coming out that Chevy will be doing right. If the SS Silverado didn't have AWD, people would just laugh at it. Chevy hasn't put out a good SS in while, imo. They always put out a great prototype SS and then detune the hell out of it. Look at the SS 454 trucks in the early 90's. Originally they were going to put tuned port injectors on it and some other stuff and it wouldn't of been the slug it was. My Mom's 1999 SS Monte Carlo was joke, ya it had more snap than a regular Monte Carlo, but it wasn't an SS. The SS Impalas were nice though, best SS in the 90's.

 

The only vehicle GM worries about keeping at the top is the Corvette. The only reason they put out a C5 Z06, was because the regular Vette got its butt handed to it by Fords Lighting, couldn't have a truck beating the American sports car, let alone a Ford?

 

GM needs to put a motor in the next SS Silverado that is not shared with a Denaili or anyother truck, something like the LS2. Throw it in a regular cab, short bed, 2WD, with a nice manual hooked up to it. That be an SS truck. The current SS is too big/long to be sporty. GM shouldn't worry about making so you can fit 6 people in it.

Posted
If the SS Silverado didn't have AWD, people would just laugh at it. 

So how would that be any different than what people currently do?? :D

Posted
If the SS Silverado didn't have AWD, people would just laugh at it. 

So how would that be any different than what people currently do?? :D

 

 

 

 

 

I think it is a joke, but a lot of people still go "oh ahh...SS!"

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,835
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ballencd
    Newest Member
    ballencd
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 685 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m doing an experiment on a vehicle I don’t have much money in. I’m going by the premise that after they last 100K miles they were no mechanical problems with assembly. Or defects with the parts. With oil changes by the minder for the first 127K miles when I acquired it. I quickly went through low mileage oil changes then settled on 5k oil changes with close to 170K miles on the vehicle currently. I did have the option to turn off the cylinder deactivation. I didn’t on this vehicle because in ECONOMY mode at least half the time. It should be a no brainer frequent oil changes are the key. The manufacturer gets away with the long oil changes with its severe service  maintenance. Just ask them what is normal. 
    • Even set to "recirculated", the air pushes out and is hot. I have noticed that sometime it doesn't want to switch between recirculated/vented air. Say it is set to Circulated Air and I want to switch to Vented, when I click the Vented button, it just quickly lights up/clicks and immediatly switches back to Circulated. It's done this a few times now. So maybe it is an actuator getting stuck? But then, that doesn't explain the hot air when everything is off does it?
    • I wonder what the price is out at the coast, Big Sur or other out of the way locations as I bet they are charging quite a premium over the in land pumps. 
    • Were you looking at the HD trucks on the GM website or the half tons as that makes all the difference. As far as I know there are only two options for the HD trucks and that is the standard 2 speed transfer case or the 2 speed transfer case that has the added 4 high auto feature and they put that transfer case by default into the LTZ and High Country although its optional in the LT and not sure if its available in the work trucks.    The half tons, that is where its been a total mess in my estimation for a few years now with most trucks below the top trim having the single speed transfer case as standard but with the option of having the two speed such as one would get by choosing the Z71 package, however then not being able to get the two speed transfer case with the towing package unless it was a higher trim truck AND had the 6.2 gas so one could combine the towing package gearing diffs with the two speed transfer case. Having said that if its a trail boss package then it gets the two speed transfer case but not necessarily able to get the tow package as it would depend on trim level and engine chosen. Believe me, people have bought the GM half tons assuming "of course it will have a two speed transfer case" only to find out after when they really pay attention to what they now own .... crap, there is NO low range !.    I don't believe Ford or Ram have gone that way yet with their half tons but like I say its been a few years now that GM has done this with the half tons. 
    • $5.19 for regular...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...