Jump to content

Did you know our trucks have an AFPR?


Recommended Posts

Posted

AFPR = adjustable fuel pressure regulator, long read but good for techies.

 

I got a '04 2500HD, 6.0, auto in the shop yesterday. It needed a tune-up and to get an inspection sticker. With the scanner I noted radom misfiring and severe lean out during WOT. So I went to town with the usual plugs and fuel filter, injector flush etc. But the engine was still leaning out to the point it would detonate the fuel after shifting into 3rd during WOT accelleration. I checked out the fuel pressure and sure enough it was about 2 lbs under specs. I have a trick I came up with for bumping fuel pressure by tapping on the regulator using a socket and hammer to slightly collapse the housing thereby increasing pressure on the spring inside which raises the fuel pressure. Works great on Fords. I was going to try it on this HD. Well I was looking at the regulator to determine what tools to use when I noticed a very small set screw right in the middle of it. Having dealt with AFPR off and on for years with my race cars and the occasional factory type I recognized it's purpose right away. I then thought it was too good to be true. So after grabbing the correct bit (T10H, tamper proof torx 10, H=hollow) and giving it a gentle twist I was able to raise the fuel pressure. It took a few turns to bring it into specs. I did several adjust and drives while watching the Short Term Fuel corrections on the scan tool to get it just right. Once I had it just tipped into rich I stopped. The good news was that power picked up under WOT due to much less timing retard from knock. There was still a bad WOT lean down after going into 3rd which is either due to poor calibration programming or the owner installed Airaid filter but it was now less severe and had less knock retard.

 

I was so really pleased about this tid-bit of knowledge because I immediatly went over to my truck, an '01 2500HD, 8.1, auto and looked at it to find that mine has an identical regulator. This is great because I've been working on my poor fuel mileage condition for months. One thing that has plauged me is that my MAF and PCM don't agree, that is the reading the PCM gets from the maf ends up as too much fuel at the injectors. In the case of the customers 6.0 his PCM had a positive fuel trim because it was having to increase injector firing time from the MAF calibration to get enough fuel. But mine was having to decrease injector time to reduce excessive fuel, having a negative number fuel trim. This doesn't mean much for part throttle cruise because the PCM is constantly correcting based on the O2 sensors, this is fuel trim, and once it's learned it remembers it. So unless a major change is made it's usually very close anyways. But at WOT things are different, the PCM overrides the O2 sensors becuase they are going to be reading rich anyways (at least they should) and goes mostly by MAF reading compared to calibration. So if fuel delivery is off by a large enough margin you can run horribly lean, like the 6.0, or way too fat, like my 8.1. One kills the engine and power, the other wastes fuel and gives away power. Adbrupt throttle changes cause the PCM to deliver fuel based on MAF reading also because the O2's aren't fast enough to correct in transient conditions.

 

So you could safely bet that I had all our equipment hooked up to my truck on the way home today. By relieving a few PSI I have most of my fuel trims hovering a 0.0%. This is good, more power and less fuel consumption. Now my PCM and MAF match each other almost perfectly, what the MAF says the PCM matches with the correct amount of fuel, not too much not too little.

 

EDIT update. I've since noted that maximum HP is acheived with fuel trim slightly rich (-2 or 3%). Fuel economy is actually better due to less knock retard and the adaptive learning can handle it fine.

 

I don't know why I haven't noted this before. I've seen no mention of the adjustment mechanisim online or in my diagnostic manuals, and I've looked. It made my day.

 

Vernon

 

WARNING: Adjustments should only be made by those who know what they are doing, you could ruin your engine. Just adjusting fuel pressure as a diagnostic guess will make things worse in most every instance. Make absolutely sure you have everything else in order, and check your pressure as decribed in factory literature before deciding to adjust pressure. Then only do it if you can verify the outcome immediately with the proper equipment.

Posted
AFPR = adjustable fuel pressure regulator, long read but good for techies. 

 

I got a '04 2500HD, 6.0, auto in the shop yesterday.  It needed a tune-up and to get an inspection sticker.  With the scanner I noted radom misfiring and severe lean out during WOT.  So I went to town with the usual plugs and fuel filter, injector flush etc.  But the dang thing was still leaning out to the point it would detonate the fuel after shifting into 3rd during WOT accelleration.  I checked out the fuel pressure and sure enough it was about 2 lbs under specs.  I have a trick I came up with for bumping fuel pressure by tapping on the regulator using a socket and hammer to slightly collapse the housing thereby increasing pressure on the spring inside which raises the fuel pressure.  Works great on Fords.  I was going to try it on this HD.  Well I was looking at the regulator to determine what tools to use when I noticed a very small set screw right in the middle of it.  Having dealt with AFPR off and on for years with my race cars and the occasional factory type I recognized it's purpose right away.  I then thought it was too good to be true.  So after grabbing the correct bit (T10H, tamper proof torx 10, H=hollow) and giving it a gentle twist I was able to raise the fuel pressure.  It took a few turns to bring it into specs.  I did several adjust and drives while watching the Short Term Fuel corrections on the scan tool to get it just right.  Once I had it just tipped into rich I stopped.  The good news was that power picked up under WOT due to much less timing retard from knock.  There was still a bad WOT lean down after going into 3rd which is either due to poor calibration programming or the owner installed Airaid filter but it was now less severe and had less knock retard.

 

I was so dang happy about this tid-bit of knowledge because I immediatly went over to my truck, an '01 2500HD, 8.1, auto and looked at it to find that mine has an identical regulator.  This is great because I've been working on my poor fuel mileage condition for months.  One thing that has plauged me is that my MAF and PCM don't agree, that is the reading the PCM gets from the maf ends up as too much fuel at the injectors.  In the case of the customers 6.0 his PCM had a positive fuel trim because it was having to increase injector firing time from the MAF calibration to get enough fuel.  But mine was having to decrease injector time to reduce excessive fuel.  This doesn't mean much for part throttle cruise because the PCM is constantly correcting based on the O2 sensors, this is fuel trim, and once it's learned it remembers it.  So unless a major change is made it's usually very close anyways.  But at WOT things are different, the PCM overrides the O2 sensors becuase they are going to be reading rich anyways (at least they should) and goes mostly by MAF reading compared to calibration.  So if fuel delivery is off by a large enough margin you can run horribly lean, like the 6.0, or way too fat, like my 8.1.  One kills the engine and power, the other wastes fuel and gives away power.  Adbrupt throttle changes cause the PCM to deliver fuel based on MAF reading also because the O2's aren't fast enough to correct in transient conditions.

 

So you could safely bet that I had all our equipment hooked up to my truck on the way home today.  By relieving a few PSI I have most of my fuel trims hovering a 0.0%.  This is good, more power and less fuel consumption.  Now my PCM and MAF match each other almost perfectly, what the MAF says the PCM matches with the correct amount of fuel, not too much not too little.

 

I don't know why I haven't noted this before.  I've seen no mention of the adjustment mechanisim online or in my diagnostic manuals, and I've looked.  It made my day.

 

Vernon

 

WARNING:  Adjustments should only be made by those who know what they are doing, you could ruin your engine.  Just adjusting fuel pressure as a diagnostic guess will make things worse in most every instance.  Make absolutely sure you have everything else in order, and check your pressure as decribed in factory literature before deciding to adjust pressure.  Then only do it if you can verify the outcome immediately with the proper equipment.

 

 

 

 

 

Nice read, Haulin'. Quite educational for this dummy :D .

 

I laughed at your disclaimer. Not because it's there or what it says, but becuase you gotta cover your butt so bad these days, that even sharing a find on the internet can haunt you !!

Posted

Thanks, I was beginning to think nobody would comment because it was over the top, lol. But the other trucks on this site don't have this feature so I put it here. You never know when your mechanic might tell you that you need a new regulator and you can ask him if he tried adjusting it first. Plus spark knock is a infamous problem in the 6.0's, this information could help.

 

I like disclaimers, too many people think you're responsible for their own actions nowadays. In other words the adjustment is there but use it properly. These trucks cost a ton of money.

Posted

So, do the 5.3l guys have this same adjustment? If so, maybe I will have to swing by your neck of the woods and have you check my Burb out.

Posted

Reminds me of all the adjusting I used to do on my Grand National. I had an adjustable regulator and a gauge right next to it...

Posted

"So, do the 5.3l guys have this same adjustment? If so, maybe I will have to swing by your neck of the woods and have you check my Burb out." Willeboy

 

I'm not sure, I looked at an '05 5.3 truck today and it didn't. It has a returnless fuel system though which I think is new for '05. Returnless fuel injection systems regulate the electric pump to controll pressure. If you pop your hood and look at the drivers side of the plastic engine cover, just under it, below the edge, about half way, you should see a small round puck about the size of a silver dollar with a small vacuum hose attached to it. This will be mounted to the fuel rail, which is the metal pipe attached to all the fuel injector tops. Another tip is that you will see two fuel lines attached to the fuel rail, supply and return. These are the silver braided lines with quick connects coming out of the trans tunnel just next to the brake booster. They will be connected to the fuel rail also. If it's returnless there will be only one.

 

By the way I checked my girls '99 LS1 Trans Am and it has a very similar looking regulator but without the adjuster screw. Hmmm, wonder if the truck unit would swap on.

 

"Reminds me of all the adjusting I used to do on my Grand National. I had an adjustable regulator and a gauge right next to it... " JRKRACE

 

Hehe, yeah me too. Except mine are Thunderbird SC's. I have my fuel pressure guage on the dash. Lets me run on stock head gaskets forever and a day. LOL. I have a special allen wrench that is really long, I can adjust pressure without opening the hood through a hole I drilled in the cowl cover. I must have made adjustments a hundred times on the butt dyno LOL.

Posted

 

:cheers: Hello! I just read you're find on the 6L fuel delivery issue. My 99 6L Silverado L.Box Ext Cab is doing the same thing. Changed plugs, dealer said change gas stations, nothing. It is noticeable during shifts up or loading up climbing a hill on the highway without putting you're foot into it. However I also have a hell of a whine from the fuel pump, it's loud! I think you may have found my problem. Could the dealer correct this or is it likley not ( hard to say) I would like to do it myself however I would need the correct tool. I will ask a GM dealer mechanic friend of mine. Thanks for the help. Neil P Thunder Bay

Posted

Very interesting. Everything was fine until the section on the 8.1. Sorry, my brain is not fully powered up on Saturdays.

Posted
However I also have a hell of a whine from the fuel pump, it's loud! ---- Could the dealer correct this or is it likley not ( hard to say) I would like to do it myself however I would need the correct tool. I will ask a GM dealer mechanic friend of mine. Thanks for the help. Neil P Thunder Bay

 

 

 

 

Niel all the electric pumps make some noise but if it's getting too loud that usually means it's going out. Make sure your pump can maintain full pressure, whatever it is currently set at, before trying to raise it in order to correct your issue. It could be a weak pump.

 

About the dealer service adjusting pressure, I can't say. I use the factory service manuals (Helms) to work on my truck and like I said the adjustability isn't ever mentioned. In fact anytime the steps get to a problem with the pressure it always says to change out the regulator. So I don't know if it is something a dealer tech can/will do to resolve a pressure related problem.

 

Vernon

Posted
Very interesting.  Everything was fine until the section on the 8.1.  Sorry, my brain is not fully powered up on Saturdays.

 

 

 

 

Still trying to recharge after Friday night I assume. :cheers:

 

Cliff notes:

The 6.0 needed more pressure to match the MAF to injectors, raised it, much better.

 

My 8.1 needed less pressure to match the MAF to injectors, lowered it, much better.

 

Does that help?

 

Vernon

Posted

Here's a update on my truck with more results:

On my 8.1 I did a lot of tuning over last week. When I had my pressure set low enough so that fuel trims were at or near zero (just right) I noted occasional leaning out at WOT and some knock triggered spark retard. I never actually heard any like on the 6.0s. So I continually raised pressure in an attempt to prevent this. I got to the point that the pressure was as high as possible, about 64 PSI, and it didn't help. So I put higher octane fuel in the tank, that didn't help. Evidently the lean out during WOT is programmed in as it was about the same no matter what. It never ran low enough to misfire but it did lean down a few times during WOT no matter how much fuel the PCM had at it's disposal. I've put the pressure back down to match the MAF and am driving it around enough so that if it can learn to adjust the WOT fuel trim it will in time. I will scan it again in a few weeks to see. I also seems like much of the witnessed spark retard was automatic, maybe torque management? It does seem to be using slightly less fuel but I haven't been able to do accurate testing as of yet.

 

 

More 6.0 tuning:

Another 6.0 HD came in Friday at 100K with the same symptoms as the other 6.0 above. Same things were done for the tune-up. This time I went straight for the jugular and raised the pressure to the maximum allowed specification (62 PSI, vacuum line off). On the subsequent test drive the power was as high as I've ever felt on a 6.0 HD and I neither heard or saw any evidence of spark knock. I decided to let the O2 sensors correct for mileage during part throttle operation and set the pressure to prevent an overly lean WOT mixture and left it there.

 

Afterwards I noted a rougher idle, on a hunch I ran a "Crankshaft Profile Learn" test. This recalibates the PCM's crankshaft sensor readings. I figured that at 100K wear on the sensor may have changed it's output enough to cause roughness at idle or that the complete tune up had changed crankshaft rotation characteristics enough to throw the PCM off. To my amazment it smoothed out within seconds. Pretty cool. Regrettably, I didn't get a chance to drive it again afterwards because the customer showed up right then and took delivery.

 

Vernon

Posted
Here's a update on my truck with more results:

On my 8.1 I did a lot of tuning over last week.  When I had my pressure set low enough so that fuel trims were at or near zero (just right) I noted occasional leaning out at WOT and some knock triggered spark retard.  I never actually heard any like on the 6.0s.  So I continually raised pressure in an attempt to prevent this.  I got to the point that the pressure was as high as possible, about 64 PSI, and it didn't help.  So I put higher octane fuel in the tank, that didn't help.  Evidently the lean out during WOT is programmed in as it was about the same no matter what.  It never ran low enough to misfire but it did lean down a few times during WOT no matter how much fuel the PCM had at it's disposal.  I've put the pressure back down to match the MAF and am driving it around enough so that if it can learn to adjust the WOT fuel trim it will in time.  I will scan it again in a few weeks to see.  I also seems like much of the witnessed spark retard was automatic, maybe torque management?  It does seem to be using slightly less fuel but I haven't been able to do accurate testing as of yet.

 

 

More 6.0 tuning:

Another 6.0 HD came in Friday at 100K with the same symptoms as the other 6.0 above.  Same things were done for the tune-up.  This time I went straight for the jugular and raised the pressure to the maximum allowed specification (62 PSI, vacuum line off).  On the subsequent test drive the power was as high as I've ever felt on a 6.0 HD and I neither heard or saw any evidence of spark knock.  I decided to let the O2 sensors correct for mileage during part throttle operation and set the pressure to prevent an overly lean WOT mixture and left it there.

 

Afterwards I noted a rougher idle, on a hunch I ran a "Crankshaft Profile Learn" test.  This recalibates the PCM's crankshaft sensor readings.  I figured that at 100K wear on the sensor may have changed it's output enough to cause roughness at idle or that the complete tune up had changed crankshaft rotation characteristics enough to throw the PCM off.  To my amazment it smoothed out within seconds.  Pretty cool.  Regrettably, I didn't get a chance to drive it again afterwards because the customer showed up right then and took delivery.

 

Vernon

 

 

 

I just looked for the pressure regulator. I have a 2004 2500hd with the 6.0l.

I couldn't find it.

The pressure line that comes from the tank, goes to the drivers side rail first then splits to the passenger side.

It doesn't seem to have a return line were I thought a pressure regulator should be.

Did they change something?

Actually, I thought when I looked into a Supercharger, that the tank needed to be dropped to modify the fuel pump/pressure regulator.

 

Pic's of this regulator would be great.

 

Thanks

Keith Stef

Posted

Keith your truck has the new returnless style fuel system. It is electronically regulated at the pump. That's why you can't find a find a vacuum referenced spring pressure diaphram type on your fuel rail. The vacuum/spring type onlys holds enough pressure at the rail to maintain the setting and bleeds the extra off into a return line going back to the tank. Since your returnless pump only sends enough to maintain pressure it doesn't need a regulator and return line at the fuel rail.

 

The only way you will be able to accurately modify fuel delivery is with PCM programming.

 

Vernon

Posted

The supercharger kit will have a pump with higher capacity but the pressures will stay the same. In effect it can maintain the needed pressure while delivering more fuel.

 

Vernon

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
    • How wide are your rims?   Toyo specs 8.5-10.0-11.0 inches. My thought would be rim might be pulling the tire inwards creating a center that is more pronounced.    I also noticed that the spec sheet says max 65psi. So you could be right lowering the pressure to ~40 psi. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...