Jump to content

recurrent starter failure in a 97 Z-71 w/350


Recommended Posts

Posted

A buddy of mine has had to put three or four starters in his truck (97 Z-71 with a 350). I have read that heat from the exhaust can cause early failure of a starter (and that a heat shield can be purchased to correct this), but I was wondering if there were any other explanations I should consider.

 

He basically has a situation where nothing happens when he turns the key. This will be kind of intermittent (cranks some days, some days nothing), for a while, then it won't work at all. After replacing the starter, he'll have several months of no problems at all, and then it'll start acting up occasionally, progressing to more often occurences, until, like above, it won't do anything at all. He says when it's to the point that it sometimes works, he can get under the starter and tap on it with a hammer, and it seems to help.

 

What do y'all think?

Posted
I think he may be having battery cable issues, not starter issues.

 

VERY common on those trucks.

 

 

 

 

 

I would agree as I have seen it. I can sometime take more power o start a hot truck than a cold one and he may have battery issues as well with a battery that does not load test well when hot.

Posted

We had one, around the same model year actually, that had the same problem. Trust me, we went over that electrical system with a fine toothed comb.

 

The truck was fine up until the first time the starter was replaced (by us) and from that point on, he came in repeatedly for starter problems. It's been a while but I'd guess we put four or five in at least. And these were GM starters, not some mickey mouse, $20, discount auto starter. Apparently, GM starters are not that much better than that. :cheers:

 

That dealership closed down in '99. That's probably the only thing that saved us from living with that truck for the rest of it's life.

 

Sorry, no revelation here. We never could figure out what was causing the failures.

Posted
We had one, around the same model year actually, that had the same problem.  Trust me, we went over that electrical system with a fine toothed comb.

 

The truck was fine up until the first time the starter was replaced (by us) and from that point on, he came in repeatedly for starter problems.  It's been a while but I'd guess we put four or five in at least.  And these were GM starters, not some mickey mouse, $20, discount auto starter.  Apparently, GM starters are not that much better than that.  :cheers:

 

That dealership closed down in '99.  That's probably the only thing that saved us from living with that truck for the rest of it's life.

 

Sorry, no revelation here.  We never could figure out what was causing the failures.

 

 

 

 

 

Long. long ago I have a full size chevy car with a big V8 and the starter used to act up when hot. I replace starter and it acted up again shortly there after. I finailly replaced battery on a whim and the problem never came back.

Posted

Thanks for the replies, fellas.

 

For those who suggest battery cable problems, let me pose two questions:

1. If this is the case, could I prove it (right or wrong) by using jumper cables to jump the main battery cables (i.e. red jumper cable from pos terminal to starter, black cable from neg terminal to block), thus bypassing any potential problems with the cable connections?

 

2. If the problem were not directly related to the starter (such as the case with cable problems), why would each new starter work for several months before the problem resurfaces? If the problem is unrelated to the starter, it seems that a brand new starter would act up just as often as a six-month old one. Is that not right?

 

Thanks again, guys. Keep the suggestions coming.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

If tapping on the starter makes it work, then that is usually a surefire sign that the brushes are worn...

 

It sounds like he's going through a series of junk starters. I absolutely hate rebuilt starters and alternators. I always try to rebuild my old one or get someone else to rebuild my old one.

 

Does this truck have one of the old big starters or one of the newer gear reduction mini starters?

Posted
Thanks for the replies, fellas.

 

For those who suggest battery cable problems, let me pose two questions:

1.  If this is the case, could I prove it (right or wrong) by using jumper cables to jump the main battery cables (i.e. red jumper cable from pos terminal to starter, black cable from neg terminal to block), thus bypassing any potential problems with the cable connections?

 

2. If the problem were not directly related to the starter (such as the case with cable problems), why would each new starter work for several months before the problem resurfaces?  If the problem is unrelated to the starter, it seems that a brand new starter would act up just as often as a six-month old one.  Is that not right?

 

Thanks again, guys.  Keep the suggestions coming.

 

 

 

 

 

1. Jumper cables directly to starter have a pretty high resistance (power loses) so if the starter is appearing to fail because of high current demands the jumpers will not "fix" it because though the help a bit due to parrallel resistance rule it may not be enough.

 

2. This one is a bit tougher. It is possible that you burning out your starters in interval of 6 months or so due to high usage of heat in starter area in your installation but also the current draw of a starter is not constant and they tend to draw more as they age and sometime hot starts can use more power than cold starts. I may in fact be a starter issue but given the problems you have had you need to rule everything else out too. If you have not replace starter power cable yet I would do so (tstarter cable and ground lead to engine block with at least 4 ga wire and 2 ga on the longer starter lead would not hurt either.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm suborn like that Ed. There's a plaque in my doctor office that says, "Don't quit, take a break." Works for allot of things.    Reality is, the wife loves her SUV and even given it's issues, she'd buy another if she found one with low enough miles. Then again she has me to maintain it.    Most of what ails this thing is GM shooting themselves in the foot and by extension the buyer. Besides a ridiculous breather system the cat warm up strategy, IMHO, is the dumbest thing I've ever seen an OEM do to a vehicle they warranty. On cold start it r-e-t-a-r-d-s the ignition to like -17* ATDC and dump fuel like kicking over a pail to force combustion in the CAT's for rapid warm up. This literally hoses the oil off cylinder walls and creates enough varnish precursors to stick rings in even well maintained engines. THEN if that wasn't bad enough they recommend using a wanting fluid specification at equally stupid interval.    Common to all GDI motors I'm aware of is this silly practice of driving the HPFP off the cam giving a leaking pump direct and unchecked access to the crankcase. And sir, eventually the ALL leak. Your job is to "catch it if you can". Yes, these are the same people that removed dipsticks from engines and transmissions in belief Joe Average wasn't capable of checking, reading and maintain his own vehicles fluids. Sadly  and in large they were correct. Most people these days can't tell a sparkplug from a fire plug.  Great ideas one and all.    Every move and every error calculated to defend themselves from the law and their own customers.       
    • Most online suppliers and Amazon. All have noted "not for use with Bose speakers".
    • Very interesting thread. Definitely didn’t expect to see this kind of mileage out of that engine. 
    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...