Jump to content

Motorcycle for beginners

kc5deb

By kc5deb
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

kc5deb Enthusiast

kc5deb

Posted
Posted

With the recent increase in gas prices, and the still high payoff of my truck, I'm thinking about buying a motorcycle.

 

I've always been one to buy the best and/or fastest of what I want, but, I think in this situation, I need to start off slow. Especially since I've ridden twice in my entire life...

 

I want something that looks good, but, nothing that can hit 90mph in 2nd gear. I'm guessing something under 500cc's would be plenty.

 

What are some good options some of you bike enthusiats would recommend?

 

I'm not wanting to spend over 3-5 grand, and it doesn't have to be new, but, I would like something I don't have to work on everytime I want to ride it.

99silveradoz71 Senior Enthusiast

99silveradoz71

Posted
Posted

I picked up a 98 Suzuki Marauder 800 in 2004 that has served me well as a work commuter thus far. I ride 22 miles each way, about 15 on the interstate and it moves out pretty well and was a great deal for the money. I'm just shy of 9000 miles on her now. She had 3800 when I bought her.

Guest chevydeerhunter

Guest chevydeerhunter

Posted
Posted

How big a boy are ya?!? For starters, I'd go with something in a 750cc range. With this much displacement, you'll have a happy medium. It'll give you plenty of power for you and any accessories you may want to add later and will have good road manners around town and good range in case you want to get it out on longer trips where you'll be cruising around 70 or so. Some great choices are the Honda Spirit 750 or the Kawasaki Vulcan 750. The Vulcan 800 is a more Harley-esque bike that's also a good choice.

 

Edit: If I could afford it, I really dig the Yamaha Roadstar Warrior!

yamaha_roadstar_warrior.jpg

tutusbaby Enthusiast

tutusbaby

Posted
Posted
With the recent increase in gas prices, and the still high payoff of my truck, I'm thinking about buying a motorcycle.

 

I've always been one to buy the best and/or fastest of what I want, but, I think in this situation, I need to start off slow.  Especially since I've ridden twice in my entire life...

 

I want something that looks good, but, nothing that can hit 90mph in 2nd gear.  I'm guessing something under 500cc's would be plenty.

 

What are some good options some of you bike enthusiats would recommend?

 

I'm not wanting to spend over 3-5 grand, and it doesn't have to be new, but, I would like something I don't have to work on everytime I want to ride it.

 

 

 

I agree with the previous reply....Yamaha's 650 V-Star is a really good starter bike and will last u awhile. Doesn't get blown all over the freeway either. Excellent reliability too. I started out on a 650 about 5 years ago. Just got a 1100 V-Star 'cause I got an bargin on it. I think my 650 is smoother though. You won't be disappointed with it unless you're very tall 'cause the bike sits low to the ground. That's why it is preferred by beginners, women and short statured men

Octane Enthusiast

Octane

Posted
Posted

Id personally go with a Sportster 883 if I were getting a starter bike, but I know you could get a Japanese cruiser for less money.

The nice thing about the hog is that you can ride it for 5 years and pretty much sell it for the same amount of money that it cost you when you bought it new.

Guest chevydeerhunter

Guest chevydeerhunter

Posted
Posted

I love Harleys but for dependability, you can't go wrong with a Japanese bike.

Worktruck Enthusiast

Worktruck

Posted
Posted

To bad your not closer to Maine. I have a 2001 Honda Shadow ACE 750 I'm selling. Great bike, easy to ride, more than 50 mpg. Easily carries the wife and I and we're not little people. Has drag pipes on it but I have the factory pipes too. Also put forward controls on it cause I have long legs. Also if you want to ride tha street and get dirty once in a while I'm selling my 04 Suzuki DR 650 too. Don't recommend the Dr as a first bike though. She's lightly modded ( Two Brothers Racing pipe, stage 2 jet kit, K&N filter w/ air box mod, 14 tooth counter sprocket and new Dunlop street legal knobbies) and has a ton of tourqe, a blast to ride but can get away from ya in a hurry. BTW selling them both to get a new Harley. Lucky me.

Octane Enthusiast

Octane

Posted
Posted
I love Harleys but for dependability, you can't go wrong with a Japanese bike.

 

 

 

:confused: True, but Id feel a much greater sense of pride in riding an American-made Harley over an imported Honda. :fume:

Nothing against Honda (or any other bike), but I like to buy American whenever possible.

ElephantNest Enthusiast

ElephantNest

Posted
Posted

I have the V-Star Classic 1100 and love it. The 650 would be perfect for a beginner, unless you are really tall, or weigh in over 175, then I'd get the 1100.

Shaners Senior Enthusiast

Shaners

Posted
Posted

SV650SK5_ablue_034C99.jpg

 

The bike I would being eying up right now if I were to pick up another one is the Suzuki SV650S. The 2003-newer are fuel injected (older models have carbs).

 

It is a liquid cooled 650cc EFI v-twin in a sportier chassis. It has a very light weight (370ish dry), and great horsepower @ 70HP. It consistently scores at the top of its' class in all the motorcycle mags.

 

My biggest problem is that the wife says that I have to sell one of my other bikes if i get one of these.

Worktruck Enthusiast

Worktruck

Posted
Posted
My biggest problem is that the wife says that I have to sell one of my other bikes if i get one of these.

 

I have the same problem, so I told the wife, I said "Wife, if you want new shoes you have to get rid of some of the other ones first." She laughed and bought em anyway. Think that would work for me and a new Harley?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 423 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...