Jump to content

Budget sound system


cyoung1253

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ordered the rest of my "budget sound system" today.

Kenwood DPX-501 head unit

http://www.kenwoodusa.com/products/ListPro...&k3=173&pr=2377

Kenwood Excelon KFC-X170 front doors

http://www.kenwoodusa.com/products/ListPro...&k3=159&pr=2151

Kenwood Excelon KFC-x460 rear doors

http://www.kenwoodusa.com/products/ListPro...&k3=165&pr=2157

Also got a Rockford Fosgate P110S4 sub to be installed into my home-built sealed enclosure under the rear seat.

http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/products/pr...89&locale=en_US

It will be powered by a Pioneer GM-3200T bridged to deliver 150w @ 4 ohms

http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/v3/p...91522415,00.htm

Total outlay so far is $490 including an 8 guage amp wiring kit, the enclosure was built out of materials I had kicking around so no cash spent there. Just under my $500 target :nopity:

I'll be running the coaxials off the head unit at 22w rms x4 for now, should I install "bass blockers" on them and let the sub do the hard work or just run 'em full range? I'm thinking >100hz on the 6 3/4's and >300hz on the 4x6's. Opinions/advice appreciated.

Truck is '05 Sierra ext cab WT with the crappy 4 spkr AM/FM radio that has just got to go.

Posted

You shouldn't need any bass blockers...The pre-amp outs will go to your amplifier, where you should be able to set the freq for it's high end...Just overlap that a bit with what the frequency response range for the coaxials/stereo combo, and you should be gold.

 

 

That's going to sound bada$$...ESPECIALLY for spending under $500. :nopity:

Posted

I'm not too worried about the front door speakers, they should be able to take whatever the 22wx4 channel head unit can dish out. Just wondering most if I should cut back on the low frequency abuse to the 4x6 rears.

Posted

Well...I've installed them before, and they do work.

 

I think I paid about $4 each for them. And they just install inline into the + speaker wire.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Update

Finally got aroung to installing the "budget system". Used some 1/8" foam padding left over from a flooring project to insulate and seal the door panels to cut down on road noise.

DSCF0568.jpg

Extra 1/2" thick foam rubber was added to the plastic panels around the speakers front and rear.

DSCF0565.jpg

Comparison of OEM speakers and the Kenwood KFC-X170's. No wonder it sounded so crappy.

DSCF0567.jpg

DSCF0566.jpg

Had to fab a couple of brackets to install the double-DIN sized DPX-501.

DSCF0578.jpg

Fits perfect in the factory cut-out. Unit is a hair crooked in this pic, tweaked the brackets to straighten it.

DSCF0583.jpg

Here is the home-built sub-box. Used bed liner spray to finish it and it looks right at home in the Work-Truck interior. The Pionner amp is small enough to hide behind the sub-enclosure and held in place with heavy duty velcro strips.

DSCF0554.jpg

DSCF0557.jpg

 

How does it all sound? :rolleyes::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

Bass from the down-firing sub has plenty of thump. No bass blockers needed for the door speakers as the Kenwood deck features high-pass filter adjustments for front and rear as well as low-pass sub pre-out adjustments. The DPX-501 has tons of tweaks and settings to choose from and is a bit confusing at first. (I actually had to read the frickin manual :eek: )

Will it win any "crank-it-up" contests and make your ears bleed? Of couse not but it plays well above comfortable listening level and makes the rear-view mirror vibrate. Huge improvement over the P.O.S. radio GM put in, and worth every penny of the $500 I spent. :cheers:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My nephews 7.3 got noisy right around 100K miles. While replacing the engine he drove his old 6.0 Chevy that had over 200K miles on it. It an old reliable backup. I haven’t been around the old shop lately. I’m curious to find out if there using the new GM heavy duty gas.
    • I don't know if you or anyone enjoys it or not but, why not share it. It's GM "truck" related and we're in the right place to discuss that 😉 I'm also working on some creative writing skills, I'm not quitting my day job to pursue that, either!   As I said, I've hit a wall because I'm not making any progress, and the progress is the fun part for me.   The idler pulley and EGR valve came in. Against better judgement, I went out there last night and put both of them in. I was able to get a nut on the back of the bolt on the side with the broken flange. There's enough flange still there that I can get that side of the EGR to snug down. It's not perfect, it's not "right", but this is the fix I have for now. If I decide to keep the rig, I talked to a guy locally who will sell me a complete intake for $100. If it's my truck, a broken flange like that would bug me too much. Yes, I'm crazy. But I embrace it.   Pulley on, EGR installed, started the truck. Great...still have a pulley squeaking like mad. That was the first disappointment. I thought I had pinpointed the problem. Before I replaced it, I sprayed the back of that pulley with PTFE and it would shut up for about 30 seconds. Is the squeak actually the belt? I'm frustrated.   SO then I decided why not disappoint myself twice, so I took it for a spin and sure enough, the CEL set for P0401 insufficient EGR flow again.   I had some extra time, so when I arrived home, I decided to ask AI about my EGR code. We had an interesting conversation.   I asked how to tell if my MAP sensor is bad and if that could be setting an EGR code since a bad MAP may not be sensing the requisite drop in manifold pressure when the EGR activates. I gave it the MAP value at idle and it told me to blip the throttle hard and watch the MAP reading. It said no, the values appear normal and it's reactive to pressure changes, and then instructed me to test voltage at the harness. I don't think it's the MAP sensor. Interesting, though, I gave it MAP reading values in inHg, and it thought I was using PSI, so I had to correct it. AI is a very dangerous tool if you aren't treating it like the machine that it is.   Then it walked me through testing the EGR and harness. It took me down an interesting path. It was referencing a gray wire and a white wire so I told it I can't tell the difference on my harness because it's dirty and old and both could be white or gray, I'm not sure. So it gave me a more accurate description of the ABCDE pins on the connector and started referencing pins instead of colors. Helpful.   The EGR harness has 12v power, and it also has 5v reference power from the PCM. What I'm unclear on is there's a ground wire and I thought AI had said that one of my tests revealed the ground in the harness was likely bad and it instructed me to wire a test ground. I got distracted and navigated away from the AI conversation, and when I went back and asked for clarification it said I must have misunderstood. (how rude- next time I'm saving the conversation!)   But I think it was onto something. I recall NOT getting 12v when I tested the power wire to the ground wire, but I did when I tested the power wire, grounding the voltmeter to the engine block. AI said no, the ground wire is actually for the PCM, that's how it commands the EGR on by grounding it and so the circuit should be open with the key on (i.e. EGR off). But I think there's also a static/overall ground that should always be grounded, and if that's bad, then the EGR isn't activating when the PCM commands it on, and thus setting the code.   There's a bunch of other tests it suggested, back-probing with the EGR plugged in and engine running. I need to get some time to focus, and not just tinkering after a long day.  
    • the 7.3 lifter issue is real, not few and far between.  my 6.6 gas does not use oil.  the 7.3 with 4.30 gears pulled hills better and felt better off the line. the 6.6 gets the job done though. mpg sucks
    • are you talking about the loud whooshing, grinding type noise? mine does it too
    • I am a huge fan of the Slate.  (SUV for her, base pickup for me.)  Unfortunately, there are no plans to sell in Canada but maybe this will change.  I think if/when Ford offered a high range. EV Maverick, it would be my first choice.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...