New Truck With The 6.2 Power

[boomer 33]

There is a hello of a motor under the head of my nre 08 Yukon Denali, Yet just like my 07 c6 vette, it desperately needs transmission tuning and deep surgery to remove the excessive torque management restraints.

The is a beast under there just waiting ti be cut loose.

And i know just the dude to do it, My buddy from NYC, the vette Dr

I have flown him here to Fayetteville before to tune cars. time to make him come back give us some power back, If you are interested drop me a private note and I will see if we can get time to do a bunch of us and then he cane leave back out. I know if three vehicles already. I have personally had my 07 Vette, and watched him do to Tahoes and another Denali with solid, seat of the pants changes that will bring a smile to your face.

You can contact here but most my time will be oven the corvette forun to start trying to get him to come again to this area soon.pop

 

Boomer

 

The guys name is chucK Mossello

[boomer 33]

There is a hello of a motor under the head of my nre 08 Yukon Denali, Yet just like my 07 c6 vette, it desperately needs transmission tuning and deep surgery to remove the excessive torque management restraints.

The is a beast under there just waiting ti be cut loose.

And i know just the dude to do it, My buddy from NYC, the vette Dr

I have flown him here to Fayetteville before to tune cars. time to make him come back give us some power back, If you are interested drop me a private note and I will see if we can get time to do a bunch of us and then he cane leave back out. I know if three vehicles already. I have personally had my 07 Vette, and watched him do to Tahoes and another Denali with solid, seat of the pants changes that will bring a smile to your face.

You can contact here but most my time will be oven the corvette forun to start trying to get him to come again to this area soon.pop

 

 

The guys name is Chuck Mossello

Chuck will jump in your car or truck and have you take off down the road with you driving with his computer hooked to the vehicles innards. He will be asking about the pparticular driving capabilities you like ,dislike and dont like and he will keep driving around with you until he has the fuel trims righteous, the ignition timing dead-on sweet, the transmission points set so that the gear changing event are just what you want, hard, soft, quick or mello. Can get rid of the rev limits and on and on. Cool guy to work with. When he left my house here in Arkansas he was headed to China for a big race where a driver with two cars flew him all the way to china so that chuck could set up the two racers just for that track and atmospheres so that he knew the cars would operate at ultimate conditions. He knows binary code down to the bit and what is cools his mechanical knowledge flows freely back in forth with his understanding oh there different variances are going to inter-relate with yht re-set values he is programming.

[boomer 33]

 

 

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

 

THIS HELPS SOLVE THE Dehnali VS Escalade power issue with the 6.2 L92 engine. It is mostly BS by letting the Caddy rev 200 RPM higher for the HP, the torque numbers are the same.

Boomer

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

[omegafiler]

 

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

 

THIS HELPS SOLVE THE Dehnali VS Escalade power issue with the 6.2 L92 engine. It is mostly BS by letting the Caddy rev 200 RPM higher for the HP, the torque numbers are the same.

Boomer

 

Very nice. I had a feeling it was just a tuning "feature" that gave the new 6.2l YD less power.

[pwf62]

 

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

 

THIS HELPS SOLVE THE Dehnali VS Escalade power issue with the 6.2 L92 engine. It is mostly BS by letting the Caddy rev 200 RPM higher for the HP, the torque numbers are the same.

Boomer

 

Very nice. I had a feeling it was just a tuning "feature" that gave the new 6.2l YD less power.

 

 

Confirming your point, I've studied my GM Factory Shop manuals for the Denali/Escalade/Yukon/Tahoe(GMT900)- the 3 volume set of manuals applies to all of these vehicles.

They break out all the different engine codes and vehicle combinations, as well as the mechanical specifications of each engine. There is only one version of the L92 engine and it shares applications with both the Denali and the Escalade. So you are correct, it is the same engine- exactly the same engine. As for the rpm difference, both hp specs apply to each vehicle. In other words, the Escalade produces 403hp at 5700 rpm and 380hp at 5500 rpm. The Denali produces 380hp at 5500 rpm and 403hp at 5700 rpm. If you observe the tachometer at full thottle upshifts, both vehicles will rev just beyond 5700 rpm. GM has simply chosen to publish the ratings at different rpms. The optical value of marketing the Cadillac with in excess of 400hp is important to them, given the price premium and the class of vehicles it competes with.

Take a look at the specs for the brand new Sierra Denali pickup. It also uses the L92 and has a published hp rating of 403 at 5700 rpm. GM wasn't worried about parasitic sales losses from the Sierra Denali against Cadillac since the pickup doesn't compete in the same market segment as the Escalade EXT. Instead they know the Sierra Denali competes with vehicles such as the 381 hp Toyota Tundra pickup. So they chose to market the vehicle as 403 hp.

[boomer 33]

 

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

 

THIS HELPS SOLVE THE Dehnali VS Escalade power issue with the 6.2 L92 engine. It is mostly BS by letting the Caddy rev 200 RPM higher for the HP, the torque numbers are the same.

Boomer

 

Very nice. I had a feeling it was just a tuning "feature" that gave the new 6.2l YD less power.

 

 

Confirming your point, I've studied my GM Factory Shop manuals for the Denali/Escalade/Yukon/Tahoe(GMT900)- the 3 volume set of manuals applies to all of these vehicles.

They break out all the different engine codes and vehicle combinations, as well as the mechanical specifications of each engine. There is only one version of the L92 engine and it shares applications with both the Denali and the Escalade. So you are correct, it is the same engine- exactly the same engine. As for the rpm difference, both hp specs apply to each vehicle. In other words, the Escalade produces 403hp at 5700 rpm and 380hp at 5500 rpm. The Denali produces 380hp at 5500 rpm and 403hp at 5700 rpm. If you observe the tachometer at full thottle upshifts, both vehicles will rev just beyond 5700 rpm. GM has simply chosen to publish the ratings at different rpms. The optical value of marketing the Cadillac with in excess of 400hp is important to them, given the price premium and the class of vehicles it competes with.

Take a look at the specs for the brand new Sierra Denali pickup. It also uses the L92 and has a published hp rating of 403 at 5700 rpm. GM wasn't worried about parasitic sales losses from the Sierra Denali against Cadillac since the pickup doesn't compete in the same market segment as the Escalade EXT. Instead they know the Sierra Denali competes with vehicles such as the 381 hp Toyota Tundra pickup. So they chose to market the vehicle as 403 hp.

 

Good Deal. Thanks for the confirmation. I had a tune done on mine and it really makes it behave great. Changing the shift points and reducing TM are huge improvements.

Have a good one. !

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

[QUIKAG]

 

2007_6200_L92_Escalade_SAE.pdf

 

THIS HELPS SOLVE THE Dehnali VS Escalade power issue with the 6.2 L92 engine. It is mostly BS by letting the Caddy rev 200 RPM higher for the HP, the torque numbers are the same.

Boomer

 

Very nice. I had a feeling it was just a tuning "feature" that gave the new 6.2l YD less power.

 

 

Confirming your point, I've studied my GM Factory Shop manuals for the Denali/Escalade/Yukon/Tahoe(GMT900)- the 3 volume set of manuals applies to all of these vehicles.

They break out all the different engine codes and vehicle combinations, as well as the mechanical specifications of each engine. There is only one version of the L92 engine and it shares applications with both the Denali and the Escalade. So you are correct, it is the same engine- exactly the same engine. As for the rpm difference, both hp specs apply to each vehicle. In other words, the Escalade produces 403hp at 5700 rpm and 380hp at 5500 rpm. The Denali produces 380hp at 5500 rpm and 403hp at 5700 rpm. If you observe the tachometer at full thottle upshifts, both vehicles will rev just beyond 5700 rpm. GM has simply chosen to publish the ratings at different rpms. The optical value of marketing the Cadillac with in excess of 400hp is important to them, given the price premium and the class of vehicles it competes with.

Take a look at the specs for the brand new Sierra Denali pickup. It also uses the L92 and has a published hp rating of 403 at 5700 rpm. GM wasn't worried about parasitic sales losses from the Sierra Denali against Cadillac since the pickup doesn't compete in the same market segment as the Escalade EXT. Instead they know the Sierra Denali competes with vehicles such as the 381 hp Toyota Tundra pickup. So they chose to market the vehicle as 403 hp.

 

Good Deal. Thanks for the confirmation. I had a tune done on mine and it really makes it behave great. Changing the shift points and reducing TM are huge improvements.

Have a good one. !

 

 

Okay, it appears my '08 Yukon Denali is shifting around 5,400rpm. So, does the Escalade wind out to 5,700-5,800rpm? See my video below for what appears to be a 5,400rpm shift point: