Jump to content

Bluetooth Options For 2008 Silverado


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 735
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

This is stupid, no wonder GM is in financial problems. must be the new business model "Don't allow customers to by part for your products, we can't have that customers would actually be happy and proud of their GM Product."

 

maybe a little bitter at them ... but still love my 2008 Sierra Crew 6.0 VortexMax.

Posted
This is stupid, no wonder GM is in financial problems. must be the new business model "Don't allow customers to by part for your products, we can't have that customers would actually be happy and proud of their GM Product."

 

maybe a little bitter at them ... but still love my 2008 Sierra Crew 6.0 VortexMax.

 

 

Yes it is stupid, but I assume OnStar has something to do with it. It is a seperate company correct? Even so, you think they would want to sell their products as well. It shouldn't matter if you want to put in on your bicycle, they should still be eager to sell it.

Posted

the only good thing I can see about this is that each day that passes there is more of a chance of finding one used from a salvage yard. the first one I tried on my own pickup I bought used from ebay for $65 so it cost me just over a $100 to add blue tooth to my truck. but I havent been able to find onother one since. remember the VCIM is the same in acadia, enclave, tahoe, suburban, yukon, yukon xl, sierra and silverado. maybe we can slowly add blue tooth to all your trucks and end up saving you same money in the process

Posted
the only good thing I can see about this is that each day that passes there is more of a chance of finding one used from a salvage yard. the first one I tried on my own pickup I bought used from ebay for $65 so it cost me just over a $100 to add blue tooth to my truck. but I havent been able to find onother one since. remember the VCIM is the same in acadia, enclave, tahoe, suburban, yukon, yukon xl, sierra and silverado. maybe we can slowly add blue tooth to all your trucks and end up saving you same money in the process

 

Maybe a glimmer of hope, I got an email from the customer service rep at GMpartsdirect and they are now saying they can supply the part they just have to order it from the manufacturer. Bad news is the price has gone way up as noted in earlier posts. I placed the order again today through the customer service rep and he quoted me approximately 10 days for delivery. I am not totally confident that they will deliver, but for now I can only hope that they can pull it off. I will post any updates.

Posted
the only good thing I can see about this is that each day that passes there is more of a chance of finding one used from a salvage yard. the first one I tried on my own pickup I bought used from ebay for $65 so it cost me just over a $100 to add blue tooth to my truck. but I havent been able to find onother one since. remember the VCIM is the same in acadia, enclave, tahoe, suburban, yukon, yukon xl, sierra and silverado. maybe we can slowly add blue tooth to all your trucks and end up saving you same money in the process

 

Maybe a glimmer of hope, I got an email from the customer service rep at GMpartsdirect and they are now saying they can supply the part they just have to order it from the manufacturer. Bad news is the price has gone way up as noted in earlier posts. I placed the order again today through the customer service rep and he quoted me approximately 10 days for delivery. I am not totally confident that they will deliver, but for now I can only hope that they can pull it off. I will post any updates.

 

 

I placed my order with GMpartsdirect March 18 and still have not received it. The rep said once they receive it from the manufacture that they will then ship it to me. Fortunately, I paid before the price increase, $219 + $40 shipping. Fingers crossed.

Posted

Has anybody has success with the BlueStar solution from http://www.costartech.com/.

 

For 279$ seems like a good solution expect that it eliminates the onstar completly.With the way they (onStar or GM) have been handling this may not be a bad thing.

 

Personally I still would rather upgrade my vcim and still have the option of using OnStar if I choose.

Posted

Anybody have any updates? I'm on the fence, but I want to jump over and order from GMpartsdirect. However, I also want to make sure if I can get the parts, the Techs at the Dealership can actally program the VCIM for my truck...an 07 Avalanche.

Posted
Has anybody has success with the BlueStar solution from http://www.costartech.com/.

 

For 279$ seems like a good solution expect that it eliminates the onstar completly.With the way they (onStar or GM) have been handling this may not be a bad thing.

 

Personally I still would rather upgrade my vcim and still have the option of using OnStar if I choose.

 

I ordered a BlueSTAR kit, it shipped yesterday, so I should have it some time next week. Should have it installed next weekend.

Posted

Ok Guys....I just ordered all 3 part numbers from GMpartsdirect. The price for the VCIM has gone up Significantly! The total cost for all 3 was $497. However, I am hoping that GMpartsdirect can now get the VCIM and the large price increase is a result of that. I wil keep you posted.

Posted

Why does GM want to foil owners from doing this upgrade but sells the DIC controls as a kit? Because there's nothing to be lost by allowing us to upgrade the DIC, but this upgrade means you'll have no need for their overpriced Onstar service. I called to cancel my onstar yesterday because I've decided it's cheaper in the long run to pay for the BlueStar solution than to keep paying for Onstar. Of course they shuffled me right over to a hard-seller, who I told that the only use I have for Onstar is the handsfree phone but since the minutes are so pricy I'm going to do something else. She immediately gave me 120 minutes for free (which is worth like fifty bucks).

 

Nice, but I still don't want to pay 20 bucks a month just to have bluestar.

 

So far, nobody has has answered or explained why ordering the 09 VCIM will not work in a truck without steering wheel controlls

Posted
Why does GM want to foil owners from doing this upgrade but sells the DIC controls as a kit? Because there's nothing to be lost by allowing us to upgrade the DIC, but this upgrade means you'll have no need for their overpriced Onstar service. I called to cancel my onstar yesterday because I've decided it's cheaper in the long run to pay for the BlueStar solution than to keep paying for Onstar. Of course they shuffled me right over to a hard-seller, who I told that the only use I have for Onstar is the handsfree phone but since the minutes are so pricy I'm going to do something else. She immediately gave me 120 minutes for free (which is worth like fifty bucks).

 

Nice, but I still don't want to pay 20 bucks a month just to have bluestar.

 

So far, nobody has has answered or explained why ordering the 09 VCIM will not work in a truck without steering wheel controlls

 

you need steering wheel controls to start and stop phone calls

Posted
Why does GM want to foil owners from doing this upgrade but sells the DIC controls as a kit? Because there's nothing to be lost by allowing us to upgrade the DIC, but this upgrade means you'll have no need for their overpriced Onstar service. I called to cancel my onstar yesterday because I've decided it's cheaper in the long run to pay for the BlueStar solution than to keep paying for Onstar. Of course they shuffled me right over to a hard-seller, who I told that the only use I have for Onstar is the handsfree phone but since the minutes are so pricy I'm going to do something else. She immediately gave me 120 minutes for free (which is worth like fifty bucks).

 

Nice, but I still don't want to pay 20 bucks a month just to have bluestar.

 

So far, nobody has has answered or explained why ordering the 09 VCIM will not work in a truck without steering wheel controlls

 

you need steering wheel controls to start and stop phone calls

 

 

 

I have an '08 SD with steering wheel controls. It was mentioned in an earlier post that there is no need to replace the steering wheel buttons other than to have the phone logo, but do I need to order the steering wheel switch # 25851951?

Posted

has anyone tried this upgrade on an 07 and below classic (GMT800) using the module from an 09 trailblazer/envoy?????

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 449 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...