Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Mike ,what about the NBS 4L60E 2-1 downshifiting bump ,when stopping at the light?

I had that problem in my 2007 ,but my 2008 is perfect...

 

BTW my name's Luiz Diaz...

 

 

Slip yoke maybe?

Posted
Ok, one more question.

 

In reference to the "Tow in 3 or D" question, you stated to run up speed enough for converter lockup. That I understand, but will the coverter lock up in 3 also, or only in D.

 

C

 

Sorry for not getting to this question earlier. I would have to connect the scanner to your truck and find out if the torque converter clutch solenoid is activating in 3rd gear. You might be able to watch to see if there's an RPM drop at partial throttle, but that might be hard to detect. I tried to look it up on alldatapro and I'm not finding any good info.

 

 

 

I know my 02 Yuk XL does not allow the convertor to lock in 3rd with the TH Mosw engaged. I had always thought it did but I checked it towing this weekend and the convertor never locked while I was in 3rd with the TH on.

Posted
I'm getting the impression these transmissions are rather fragile. Is that really the case? It's making me reconsider purchasing a TT or doing any tuning. I would like more power, but this makes think it'll just strip this gear quicker.

 

 

I would not worry about it. There are litteraly millions of these trans on the road in GM Trucks and many of them last 200,000+.

 

If you plan to tow, either add an external cooler (stacked plate) or upgrade the one you have considering where you live. Service the trans, I recommend syn fluid. Add a trans temp gauge like the Aeroforce Interceptor, tow in 3rd with the T/H engaged and enjoy your truck.

 

You need to research max TT length for your Tahoe. Their shorter wheelbase does limit your trailer length.

Posted

Anyone have any experience with the Tru Cool tranny coolers? Is the stock cooler that comes on the GMT900 an example of the tube and fin style?

 

Good discussion.

Posted (edited)
I'm getting the impression these transmissions are rather fragile. Is that really the case? It's making me reconsider purchasing a TT or doing any tuning. I would like more power, but this makes think it'll just strip this gear quicker.

 

 

I would not worry about it. There are litteraly millions of these trans on the road in GM Trucks and many of them last 200,000+.

 

If you plan to tow, either add an external cooler (stacked plate) or upgrade the one you have considering where you live. Service the trans, I recommend syn fluid. Add a trans temp gauge like the Aeroforce Interceptor, tow in 3rd with the T/H engaged and enjoy your truck.

 

You need to research max TT length for your Tahoe. Their shorter wheelbase does limit your trailer length.

 

 

Good to know about the TT length, thanks.

 

As for the reliability of this tranny, what you're saying is the impression I'm starting to get after "wasting" this whole weekend reading this board. :D

 

At first I read enough to make me nervous, but the more I read, the more I'm comfortable with it. In fact, I'm pretty much ready to order a tune from wait4me. I'm now convinced the tranny will be fine.

 

I do have 4.10 gears and the factory HD aux trans cooler. I don't know what the quality of that one is though.

 

I don't remember the context of the post, but I remember someone here telling a guy his tranny already comes with synthetic. When did that start? Mine might already be synthetic?

Edited by Satori
Posted
So does anyone know if this sun gear has been upgraded in the new models GMT-900?

Just curious if it is across the board, I know GM made some changes to the trannys and was wondering if a better one was actually installed?

 

I think they may have, but I only dealt with transmissions that were 2003 and older since most newer trucks were under factory warranty when I worked there.

Posted
GREAT info in this topic. I remember back in high school, my auto shop teacher preaching about coming to a COMPLETE stop before shifting gears. Most of us thought it wouldnt do much (if any) damage. Sounds like he was right!

 

Have you had any 6 speed GM trannys (6LE 70/80) or something like that in for repair? I'm sure there aren't as many out there as the 4 speeds since the 6 was only in Denalis and SUV's. 2009 year available in the 1500's.

I could have sworn I remeber someone saying the 6 speeds were mostly selnoids.

 

What do you think about their build quality comared to the 4 speeds?

 

Thanks!

 

Solenoids have always been a problem on 4L60E transmisions. I don't know much about 6L80E's.

Posted
I'm getting the impression these transmissions are rather fragile. Is that really the case? It's making me reconsider purchasing a TT or doing any tuning. I would like more power, but this makes think it'll just strip this gear quicker.

 

 

I would not worry about it. There are litteraly millions of these trans on the road in GM Trucks and many of them last 200,000+.

 

If you plan to tow, either add an external cooler (stacked plate) or upgrade the one you have considering where you live. Service the trans, I recommend syn fluid. Add a trans temp gauge like the Aeroforce Interceptor, tow in 3rd with the T/H engaged and enjoy your truck.

 

You need to research max TT length for your Tahoe. Their shorter wheelbase does limit your trailer length.

 

 

Good to know about the TT length, thanks.

 

As for the reliability of this tranny, what you're saying is the impression I'm starting to get after "wasting" this whole weekend reading this board. :D

 

At first I read enough to make me nervous, but the more I read, the more I'm comfortable with it. In fact, I'm pretty much ready to order a tune from wait4me. I'm now convinced the tranny will be fine.

 

I do have 4.10 gears and the factory HD aux trans cooler. I don't know what the quality of that one is though.

 

I don't remember the context of the post, but I remember someone here telling a guy his tranny already comes with synthetic. When did that start? Mine might already be synthetic?

 

 

Mike,

 

I can help you with your questions.

 

Your truck does not have syn fluid. GM began using Dex VI in late 06 if I am correct but I know they were not using it in 05.

 

Your OE cooler is a stacked plate designed cooler and is an excellent overall cooler. IMO it is too small for high heat climates such as the Southern parts of the US. This is why I upgraded mine to an 11 x 11 x 3/4 unit. Your is apprx 5" x 11" x 3/4". I will be happy to send you some pics of mine installed in case you consider upgrading. I would need you to send me your e mail address in a Private Message.

 

If you have the 4.10 gears you will be pleased with the towing capacity of your truck. You will want to use 3rd with the TH mode. This will keep your Revs right in the 5.3's sweet (2300 to 2800) spot when you are driving between 55 and 65. If you get a tune, be sure you tell them you are towing and are looking for extra tq in the low to mid range. More HP and TQ at 5500 RPMs is not going to help you tug that camper.

Posted
Anyone have any experience with the Tru Cool tranny coolers? Is the stock cooler that comes on the GMT900 an example of the tube and fin style?

 

Good discussion.

 

 

Bob, I could be wrong but I believe Tru Cool was the orginator of the Stacked plate cooler and held the patent for years. I think they still produce them for several other companies such as Hayden. I cannot swear to this but I can tell you they are an excellent product. This would be an excellent choice for you considering where you live becuase they offer several models with built in thermostats. This lets the cold thick fluid bypass the cooler until it gets warm. This is not an issue where I live.

 

I do recommend the 3/4" thick models as they offer more efficient cooling than the 1.5" thick models. GM stopped using the thicker models in 99 with the 800 series trucks.

 

I just towed my camper this weekend and the outside temps were only in the mid to upper 80s. I was pulling bigger and longer hills than I had ever pulled before and my trans temp peaked at 158 for a few minutes but ran low 150s most of the time.

Posted
Ok, one more question.

 

In reference to the "Tow in 3 or D" question, you stated to run up speed enough for converter lockup. That I understand, but will the coverter lock up in 3 also, or only in D.

 

C

 

Sorry for not getting to this question earlier. I would have to connect the scanner to your truck and find out if the torque converter clutch solenoid is activating in 3rd gear. You might be able to watch to see if there's an RPM drop at partial throttle, but that might be hard to detect. I tried to look it up on alldatapro and I'm not finding any good info.

 

Just FYI, the TC does not lockup when in tow/haul mode. Here are charts from HPTuners showing engage/disengage speeds for the TC in both normal and performance (tow/haul) for my 4L70e.

post-45031-1220389130_thumb.jpg

post-45031-1220389130_thumb.jpg

post-45031-1220389130_thumb.jpg

post-45031-1220389130_thumb.jpg

Posted

WOW! This is a great thread. I have a 2000 NBS Silv 4x4 and bought it with 91k miles. At 100k miles I dropped the pan and changed the filter. I filled it up, ran it around the block a few times, and drained the fluid/filled it back up. (basically half of the fluid).

 

Would it be a good idea to drain the fluid every 15k miles (which would be half the fluid in the system)? I am under the belief that the fluid has "cleaning properties" and you dont want to do it too much, but figure I should change the fluid every 15k and fluid filter every 30k? Of course, I'm looking at preventative MX on my truck as I plan on keeping it a long time.

Posted (edited)

Maybe I missed it, but I have still not seen an answer as to whether the converter will lock up in "3" , or only in "D" :D I see where it won't in T/H mode, but what about in regular "3"?

 

Also, I could swear I have seen my 2008 converter lockup in T/H. After the 3/4 shift, I would then see the RPM drop again......

 

C

Edited by compulynx
Posted
I'm getting the impression these transmissions are rather fragile. Is that really the case? It's making me reconsider purchasing a TT or doing any tuning. I would like more power, but this makes think it'll just strip this gear quicker.

 

 

I would not worry about it. There are litteraly millions of these trans on the road in GM Trucks and many of them last 200,000+.

 

If you plan to tow, either add an external cooler (stacked plate) or upgrade the one you have considering where you live. Service the trans, I recommend syn fluid. Add a trans temp gauge like the Aeroforce Interceptor, tow in 3rd with the T/H engaged and enjoy your truck.

 

You need to research max TT length for your Tahoe. Their shorter wheelbase does limit your trailer length.

 

 

Good to know about the TT length, thanks.

 

As for the reliability of this tranny, what you're saying is the impression I'm starting to get after "wasting" this whole weekend reading this board. :D

 

At first I read enough to make me nervous, but the more I read, the more I'm comfortable with it. In fact, I'm pretty much ready to order a tune from wait4me. I'm now convinced the tranny will be fine.

 

I do have 4.10 gears and the factory HD aux trans cooler. I don't know what the quality of that one is though.

 

I don't remember the context of the post, but I remember someone here telling a guy his tranny already comes with synthetic. When did that start? Mine might already be synthetic?

 

 

Mike,

 

I can help you with your questions.

 

Your truck does not have syn fluid. GM began using Dex VI in late 06 if I am correct but I know they were not using it in 05.

 

Your OE cooler is a stacked plate designed cooler and is an excellent overall cooler. IMO it is too small for high heat climates such as the Southern parts of the US. This is why I upgraded mine to an 11 x 11 x 3/4 unit. Your is apprx 5" x 11" x 3/4". I will be happy to send you some pics of mine installed in case you consider upgrading. I would need you to send me your e mail address in a Private Message.

 

If you have the 4.10 gears you will be pleased with the towing capacity of your truck. You will want to use 3rd with the TH mode. This will keep your Revs right in the 5.3's sweet (2300 to 2800) spot when you are driving between 55 and 65. If you get a tune, be sure you tell them you are towing and are looking for extra tq in the low to mid range. More HP and TQ at 5500 RPMs is not going to help you tug that camper.

 

 

 

 

Thanks, there are a few other things I want to do before upgrading the oil cooler. No rush since it might be a while until I buy a TT. Really tapped into the savings to get the Tahoe.

 

I should probably change the tranny fluid and filter though. It has 72000 on it, and I don't see any tranny service on the service history.

 

And more low end torque is a definite requirement of any tune I end up getting. :lol:

Posted
Maybe I missed it, but I have still not seen an answer as to whether the converter will lock up in "3" , or only in "D" :D I see where it won't in T/H mode, but what about in regular "3"?

 

Also, I could swear I have seen my 2008 converter lockup in T/H. After the 3/4 shift, I would then see the RPM drop again......

 

C

If you mean if the selector is in 3rd then yes, it should. The only thing that I know of that is disabled (different from when it is in "D" but in 3rd gear) is AFM, that will not work if the selector is not in "D"

 

Also it is possible that you have a different tranny than mine. I think that the trans makes less heat when the TC is locked so maybe if it is a 4l60e then they do it to cut down on heat?? Mine is a 4l70e. Just a guess on that one.

Posted
Maybe I missed it, but I have still not seen an answer as to whether the converter will lock up in "3" , or only in "D" :thumbs: I see where it won't in T/H mode, but what about in regular "3"?

 

Also, I could swear I have seen my 2008 converter lockup in T/H. After the 3/4 shift, I would then see the RPM drop again......

 

C

 

There is no hard and fast rule that applies to every model year or even every engine / trans / axle variant. When the TCC locks up is controlled by the calibration in the TCM / PCM (depending on whether the trans controller is standalone or integrated with the engine controller - newer trucks are standalone). Generally they all have a typical pattern for apply release, but there's nothing saying they couldn't have been cal'd differently from one year to the next. If you see a 2-300 rpm drop after the 3-4 shift the TCC is applying.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,351 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...