Jump to content

2008 Trailblzer Ss


Recommended Posts

Posted

They have great deals on 2008 Trailblazers SS right now, but the vehicle EPA mileage is only 12 MPG city and 16 MPG highway. Any Trailblazer SS owners here to comment on this? Is this typical mileage you experience with this vehicle even when driven conservatively? On top of this , you need to use premium fuel. At $ 4/gallon, this gets a little pricey.

Posted

I'm currently averaging 16.6 mpg calculated from miles traveled and gallons purchased. Mostly rural highway driving, 20 miles to/from work. Short trips and stop and go driving really kill the gas mileage of this vehicle. I'm happy with the vehicle as it is. I have to be trapped in it for an hour every workday. I might as well enjoy myself. You get what you pay for. People with SUV's complain about the mileage, but people who drive little ricers complain about lack of comfort and performance. For me, it's worth the few extra bucks a day to operate.

 

They have great deals on 2008 Trailblazers SS right now, but the vehicle EPA mileage is only 12 MPG city and 16 MPG highway. Any Trailblazer SS owners here to comment on this? Is this typical mileage you experience with this vehicle even when driven conservatively? On top of this , you need to use premium fuel. At $ 4/gallon, this gets a little pricey.
Posted
They have great deals on 2008 Trailblazers SS right now, but the vehicle EPA mileage is only 12 MPG city and 16 MPG highway. Any Trailblazer SS owners here to comment on this? Is this typical mileage you experience with this vehicle even when driven conservatively? On top of this , you need to use premium fuel. At $ 4/gallon, this gets a little pricey.

 

 

I just got a 2008 AWD 3SS on Thursday, so far its averaging high 13s according to the DIC mostly around town pretty much babying it so far. Its better than I expected, my 98 bravada got mid 15s driving about the same and its smaller with half the horsepower

Posted

It's not out of line mileage. Are you comparing it to what you are used to seeing on an epa mileage sticker. The standard for 2008 is different than previous years. The epa sticker is going to drop like a rock for everything now that they are using real world conditions.

Posted
They have great deals on 2008 Trailblazers SS right now, but the vehicle EPA mileage is only 12 MPG city and 16 MPG highway. Any Trailblazer SS owners here to comment on this? Is this typical mileage you experience with this vehicle even when driven conservatively? On top of this , you need to use premium fuel. At $ 4/gallon, this gets a little pricey.

 

That's pretty in line with what I always got. 16 might be a little generous though...With my heavy foot :)

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
They have great deals on 2008 Trailblazers SS right now, but the vehicle EPA mileage is only 12 MPG city and 16 MPG highway. Any Trailblazer SS owners here to comment on this? Is this typical mileage you experience with this vehicle even when driven conservatively? On top of this , you need to use premium fuel. At $ 4/gallon, this gets a little pricey.

 

That's pretty in line with what I always got. 16 might be a little generous though...With my heavy foot :dunno:

 

I have an 07 2WD...I have taken many long trips and have averaged about 18mpg, in town about 15, I have no problem with these numbers as fun as it is to drive this vehicle.

Posted
They have great deals on 2008 Trailblazers SS right now, but the vehicle EPA mileage is only 12 MPG city and 16 MPG highway. Any Trailblazer SS owners here to comment on this? Is this typical mileage you experience with this vehicle even when driven conservatively? On top of this , you need to use premium fuel. At $ 4/gallon, this gets a little pricey.

 

No offense, but if your worrying about fuel economy, you shouldnt buy a vehicle like that.

Posted

Yeah I would recommend that you decide what you are looking for. If you want good gas mileage get a regular trailblazer, but if you want the capacity of the trailblazer with an awesome 400 HP engine so you can easily beat ricers at stoplights, then get the SS. Don't get the SS if your highest priority is fuel mileage.

Posted

We have an 06 TBSS. We love it. It's actually my wife's dd. We have taken it on a few long trips and we have been just under 19mpg. 18 is fairly easy to achive on the freeway. Ours is a 2 wheel drive though. One great thing about it is the awesome turning radius. I don't think I've ever had a car with that tight of a turning radius! :)

Posted
We have an 06 TBSS. We love it. It's actually my wife's dd. We have taken it on a few long trips and we have been just under 19mpg. 18 is fairly easy to achive on the freeway. Ours is a 2 wheel drive though. One great thing about it is the awesome turning radius. I don't think I've ever had a car with that tight of a turning radius! :cheers:

Your wife has good taste. It's funny because that is what my wife likes the most about my SS is its turning radius....that and its passing people like there standing still abilities.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I have an 06' tb ss, I only get about 12 mpg. I drove 100miles on a trip where I got about 24 mpg. I don't mind the premium fuel or the low gas milaege, I love the horsepower and not worrying if it's a vette or a mustang pulling up next to me, I'm proud to blow them away with an suv. It's all in what you want.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 37's would probably fit with a 3" lift. GM only has two gear ratios for these trucks 3.73 for gas and 3.42 for diesel. And they can't be programmed for anything else at the moment. The rough country module just corrects the speedometer and odometer to adjust for tire size it's not a programming device.   You haven't said if your truck is gas or diesel, but for a gas truck the 10L1000 with 3.73 gears has a lower final drive ratio than the 6L90 it replaced would if it were swapped to 4.10s. GM used the same 3.73 gearing in 6 speed gas trucks. I don't think you'll have any issue running 37's with the 10 speed other than the reduction in mpg and towing/weight capacity which is as much of a function of the lift as the tire size.
    • Actually, it probably was the brakes.  It's weird the way the messages came across, but I took it to the dealer thinking that something was wrong with the sensor and in fact, the rear brakes were shot.  What I don't understand is why the messages never said, your brake pads are low.  First I got the message I posted above, taking about new pads being detected.  Then I got a message saying that the system needed repaired.  It never said, change your brake pads.
    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...