Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys I have a Vmax with the 4L70 in it. Plans for it include CAI, exhaust, and a tune for sure and that is probably it engine related. Anyway, I was wondering what your thoughts are on putting vette style servo in and leaving it at that. I put an HD2 kit in my old 5.3 and the shifts were pretty harsh, not sure it is what I am looking for. I really don't care about having the harsh racing shifts, I just want to make sure my tranny doesn't go out from removing the TM. Would there be any benefit from doing just the servo? If i understand it correctly the servo and the SK apply more pressure to the clutches in turn decreasing slippage and ultimately prolonging the life. (the servo is easy and i'm not sure I feel like pulling apart the valve body again it was kind of a pain in the ass)

Posted
Hey guys I have a Vmax with the 4L70 in it. Plans for it include CAI, exhaust, and a tune for sure and that is probably it engine related. Anyway, I was wondering what your thoughts are on putting vette style servo in and leaving it at that. I put an HD2 kit in my old 5.3 and the shifts were pretty harsh, not sure it is what I am looking for. I really don't care about having the harsh racing shifts, I just want to make sure my tranny doesn't go out from removing the TM. Would there be any benefit from doing just the servo? If i understand it correctly the servo and the SK apply more pressure to the clutches in turn decreasing slippage and ultimately prolonging the life. (the servo is easy and i'm not sure I feel like pulling apart the valve body again it was kind of a pain in the ass)

 

 

 

The Vette servo will give you firmer 1-2 shifts and influence how your 2-3 shift (and 3-2 shift) happens.

 

Keep in mind that the 2-3 (and 3-2) shift involve 2 clutches (or actually a clutch and a band) with one coming on and one going off. If you mis-time how they work due to your changes, bad stuff happens. On a 2-3 shift, if you let go of the 2-4 band too soon before the 3-4 clutch is applied, you get a moment of 'first gear' before the 3-4 clutch grabs and pulls engine down to 3rd. You're working the 3-4 clutch harder to pull the engine down from the momentary first gear state. If you grab the clutch before the band lets go completely, you get a moment of 4th gear before the band loses capacity and you get third for real. Now you're trying to use the 3-4 clutch to basically go from 2nd gear engine speed to 4th gear engine speed for a moment. Both situations can work the 3-4 clutch more that if the 'handshake' between the band and clutch is timed correctly.

 

From what I've read, the trans hardware and TM both work to help that timing be correct. At low power levels, you probably won't hurt anything too bad if it's a bit off, but at WOT, you run the risk of roaching things (sooner) without the TM if the trans hardware is set up assuming the TM is there.

 

Maybe I'm just gun shy, but I'd be reluctant to remove the TM on a newer vehicle that you were planning on keeping for a while. On an upshift, you're going from a faster engine speed to a slower one and the clutches are what's slowing the engine down...it seems to me that TM might help get the engine to the slower speed 'quicker' that if you didn't have the TM.

 

Think of it this way.....For upshifts, clutches are like the brakes on your truck when you're towing a trailer, and having engine mods that make more power is like towing a heavier trailer. Truck brakes are there to slow things down and so are the trans clutches.

 

TM is like having a brakes on the trailer, too...you could slow the truck down without the trailer brakes, but the truck's brakes will wear quicker or they'll need to be upgraded if you don't have the trailer brakes to help slow things down. Tow heavy without trailer brakes and you're really asking for brake issues. Run higher power without TM and you're asking for clutch issues.

 

Because TM only happens during the shift, I'd be suprised if TM cost you any significant performance on a WOT run. You might see it on the strip, but in normal driving, do you really notice the performance improvement, or is it just a 'feel thing'?

 

If it's just the firmer shift feel during normal driving that you're after, there are cleaner ways to accomplish this in the 4L60/70 without risking the durability of the clutches, but you need to know what shifts you're going after, and under what conditions (light throttle, medium throttle, WOT, etc). This means you have to do some homework to figure out the right way to do it (or just let someone else do the homework and live with what they decide is an OK risk/reward for your truck).

 

I killed 2 sets of 3-4 clutch plates in the 4L60 in my carb'ed big block Camaro before I pulled out the shift kit from a 'big name company' and did my own targeted mods. I have another 30,000 miles on my Camaro and a whole bunce of strip passes, and all is good. I got less than 5000 miles total on 2 sets of 3-4 plates with the shift kit. They said they tested their kit in a trans behind a 550+ HP big block, and since I wasn't making that kind of power, I'd be OK. Apparently, their 'testing' was a few strip passes to make sure it didn't blow up. Needless to say, I'm done trusting others as they aren't the ones pulling my trans and replacing my burnt clutches.

 

Interesting note....most if not all of the 'new' 6-speed truck transmissions use the '2 clutches involved' methodology for all the shifts. Gone are the days when you could just boost line pressure and drill out a couple spacer plate holes to get firm durable shifts. Now you better trust the guy doing your 'tune' and have him warranty his work from a trans durability perspective if you plan on keeping your truck for a while!

Posted

Well i rarely race my truck and when i do i shift fast enough to stay a head of automatic versions of my truck. I prefer manual to automatic anyways beacuse you have less problems with them so there. :confused:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...