Jump to content

Lower Ball Joints On 1999 K2500 Suburban


hawk1061

Recommended Posts

Posted

How do I know if the lower ball joints on my 1999 GMC Suburban K2500 need to be replaced?

 

Last week I went to B***e Tire and got 4 new tires. Since they are new, I wanted an alignment. They installed the tires, then told me that they could not align the truck cause the lower ball joints were bad. I supected they were trying to pad the bill and decided to take it elsewhere to get another opinion.

 

Took it to another place, they told me the front suspension was solid and tight, no need for any work to be done.

 

Went back to B***e Tire this morn for the alignment on the new tires. Again, they tell me it needs lower ball joints. Guy takes me out to the shop where the truck is over the pit. He has the front end supported by the lower control arm with front tires about 2" off the ground. He takes a crowbar, puts it between the bottom of the tire and the ground and lifts up and down a couple times (passenger side) and points to the lower ball joint. I see it move up and down maybe 1/8 to 1/4 inch (there was no way I could measure it and he didn't have anything there to measure). He did the same on the driver side and I could see less vertical movement at the joint but it did move a bit (again I can't say how far cause he had nothing to measure it with).

 

So, was that the right way for him to test it? I thought you had to move the top and bottom of the tire 'in and out' to see if there was play, not up and down.

 

Anyway, they quoted $169.74 for two Moog Ball Joints, $300.00 to remove and replace both sides, then $47.90 for a Thrust Angle Alignment.

 

What is a Thrust Angle Alignment and do I need it?

 

Also, assuming that the ball joints are really bad, is that a good price?

 

Thanks

Posted
He takes a crowbar, puts it between the bottom of the tire and the ground and lifts up and down a couple times (passenger side) and points to the lower ball joint. I see it move up and down maybe 1/8 to 1/4 inch (there was no way I could measure it and he didn't have anything there to measure). He did the same on the driver side and I could see less vertical movement at the joint but it did move a bit (again I can't say how far cause he had nothing to measure it with).

Thats how I test them.

Posted
How do I know if the lower ball joints on my 1999 GMC Suburban K2500 need to be replaced?

 

Last week I went to B***e Tire and got 4 new tires. Since they are new, I wanted an alignment. They installed the tires, then told me that they could not align the truck cause the lower ball joints were bad. I supected they were trying to pad the bill and decided to take it elsewhere to get another opinion.

 

Took it to another place, they told me the front suspension was solid and tight, no need for any work to be done.

 

Went back to B***e Tire this morn for the alignment on the new tires. Again, they tell me it needs lower ball joints. Guy takes me out to the shop where the truck is over the pit. He has the front end supported by the lower control arm with front tires about 2" off the ground. He takes a crowbar, puts it between the bottom of the tire and the ground and lifts up and down a couple times (passenger side) and points to the lower ball joint. I see it move up and down maybe 1/8 to 1/4 inch (there was no way I could measure it and he didn't have anything there to measure). He did the same on the driver side and I could see less vertical movement at the joint but it did move a bit (again I can't say how far cause he had nothing to measure it with).

 

So, was that the right way for him to test it? I thought you had to move the top and bottom of the tire 'in and out' to see if there was play, not up and down.

 

Anyway, they quoted $169.74 for two Moog Ball Joints, $300.00 to remove and replace both sides, then $47.90 for a Thrust Angle Alignment.

 

What is a Thrust Angle Alignment and do I need it?

Also, assuming that the ball joints are really bad, is that a good price?

 

Thanks

 

That is just what some places call a 2-wheel alignment.

Posted
What is a Thrust Angle Alignment and do I need it?

 

 

That is just what some places call a 2-wheel alignment.

Thrust angle is the direction that the rear wheels are pointing in relation to the center line of the vehicle. This is used primarily in vehicle with rear independant suspension. The truck has no way to adjust the rear axle to compensate for this, the toe must be adjusted to compensated. If the thrust angle is out of spec(not zero'd), the vehicle may 'dog leg' (Kind of drive sideways) or the steering wheel may not be centered.

 

 

A good alignment shop should be able to get you a printout with the before and after readings. It should also have with the factory specs and how far out you were out from them.

Posted

So, how much vertical movement should there be if the ball joint is good? Should I notice any movement? Or is the tolerance so small that it should not be 'seeable' by the eye?

 

Basically I guess I'm asking is if it sounds like they are bad (maybe was 1/8 to 1/4 inch movement on passenger side and 'less' on the driver side) or was he just trying to pad his bill with an unnecessary repair?

 

Thanks again.

 

PS: If bad, does anyone know of a reputable place to take it too in the southeastern Michigan area? I'm over in Canton if anyone is familiar with the area and can recommend a good place to go.

Posted

You should see no movement.

The cost for the ball joints seems high. I would see if you could order your own and get them to replace it, or see if they can come down $60. The labor seems about right, depending on what they charge. As for the thrust angle, that should be included in an alignment.

 

IMO, id get another (3rd)opinion for another shop.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...