Jump to content

Tune Up Intervals?

nonotme42

Recommended Posts

nonotme42 Enthusiast

nonotme42

Posted
Posted

Hey fellas, haven't been around recently, but it's been nuts.

 

Anyways, I keep track of my fuel purchases and economy like a hawk. Not the DIC economy, which tends to be extremely optimistic, but the actual fuel in, calculated numbers. But this isn't about the DIC. What it is about is that last year, I averaged 15.95 mpg. This year, 13.95. Exactly the same conditions, same driving patterns, etc. It also doesn't seem to idle with the same smoothness as when I got it with 31k. It's now got 65,700. It also has a tendency to not start the first time when I hit it my remote start. Once or twice, actually didn't start twice, and it has no effect whether its hot or cold. To the best of my knowledge, GM's recommendation is 100k for plugs and wires, and absolutely everything else on the truck is up to date. I use 0W-30 Amsoil SSO in the engine (Currently at 10k), Dex VI and a WIX filter (Now at 15k) in the transmission with a B&M cooler, Mobil1 75W-90 in both differentials (At 15k), GM AutoTrak II in the transfer case (At 15k), only Shell or Chevron (top tier) fuels, along with Techron concentrate or Seafoam every 5k miles. Air filter is a new Purolator PureONE, PCV is new, obviously can't get to the fuel filter, and all that's really left is the plugs and wires....am I forgetting anything else? I really don't want to do a tuneup yet if that's not going to fix my problem...since I'm going to have to use Delco Iridiums and MSD wires (I have a serious problem with buying cheap replacement fluids and parts). I suppose it could use a tune, and maybe I could squeeze a bit out that way, in combination with the new plugs and wires, but I just want to verify I'm not missing anything.

WilliamBos Senior Enthusiast

WilliamBos

Posted
Posted

Try running regular (87) grade gas. You are literally pouring you money down the drain by running higher grade fuel. It will not hurt any. Not sure if that will help the mileage, but why not try.

 

And how about the MAF?? (like posted above.) Also the throttle plate...

 

Use the AC Delco wires. There is nothing wrong with them. Sometimes you pay more for the aftermarket name, and get a less quality product. (MSD.)

 

 

 

Hey fellas, haven't been around recently, but it's been nuts.

 

Anyways, I keep track of my fuel purchases and economy like a hawk. Not the DIC economy, which tends to be extremely optimistic, but the actual fuel in, calculated numbers. But this isn't about the DIC. What it is about is that last year, I averaged 15.95 mpg. This year, 13.95. Exactly the same conditions, same driving patterns, etc. It also doesn't seem to idle with the same smoothness as when I got it with 31k. It's now got 65,700. It also has a tendency to not start the first time when I hit it my remote start. Once or twice, actually didn't start twice, and it has no effect whether its hot or cold. To the best of my knowledge, GM's recommendation is 100k for plugs and wires, and absolutely everything else on the truck is up to date. I use 0W-30 Amsoil SSO in the engine (Currently at 10k), Dex VI and a WIX filter (Now at 15k) in the transmission with a B&M cooler, Mobil1 75W-90 in both differentials (At 15k), GM AutoTrak II in the transfer case (At 15k), only Shell or Chevron (top tier) fuels, along with Techron concentrate or Seafoam every 5k miles. Air filter is a new Purolator PureONE, PCV is new, obviously can't get to the fuel filter, and all that's really left is the plugs and wires....am I forgetting anything else? I really don't want to do a tuneup yet if that's not going to fix my problem...since I'm going to have to use Delco Iridiums and MSD wires (I have a serious problem with buying cheap replacement fluids and parts). I suppose it could use a tune, and maybe I could squeeze a bit out that way, in combination with the new plugs and wires, but I just want to verify I'm not missing anything.

tramz Enthusiast

tramz

Posted
Posted

I've had 1.8 MPG drop over the past year. I was talking with the manager of the local fuel depot/distribution station, an acquaintance through a mutual friend and he explained that the ethanol mix in fuels has negatively affected MPG. He said that the gas is 84/85 octane and the added ethanol boosts the octane to 87 in low grade. He recommends running mid-grade as this is simply a blend of low and high grade and will burn better. He explained why and went into a whole rant about the ethanol its ill effects on all engines. He showed me the storage tank where it's stored before they blend it, the tank was covered in this thick black residue, I asked what it was, his reply was, it’s mold, plant/food bi-product and then more ranting. He also said that ethanol was the alternative to high gas prices, and because it has to be trucked everywhere the price per gallon is over $3.00. This is what was told to me, and hope I conveyed it correctly. I don't have anything to validate it, but it sounded good at the time.

nonotme42 Enthusiast

nonotme42

Posted
  • Author
Posted

thanks for the responses.

 

Yes, I forgot to mention, I clean the MAF on my vehicles every 20k.

 

I don't use premium fuel, I only use 87, but have, before, gone with a small stint (5 fillups or so) of premium from one station or another to see if that affects my mileage, as well as stints on non-ethanol fuels (when they still had the handful around here before the mandation went into effect, and I can say for sure that while the ethanol did indeed make a difference, it wasn't contributing significantly, because on a road trip I made up to New York May 2008, I averaged between 16.9 and 22 mpg, and every single station had up to 10% ethanol. Trust me though, I absolutely HATE the idea of ethanol altogether...its not a solution to a damn thing.

 

However, I have no problem believing that quite possibly, ethanol affected the long duration maintenance intervals that GM called for on this truck, one way or another.

 

And as far as the ignition wires go, yes, normally, I'd go with Delco, as normally, OE is a superior product, but MSD Super Conductor wires specifically are some of the highest quality aftermarket wires on the market besides Napa Belden. They're the absolute lowest resistance available, and the highest shielded to prevent any and nearly all electronic interferance. And since they're not INSANELY expensive, I can't justify knowing about them and not using them. But that's of course, an entirely separate conversation.

 

I've been driving like an absolute SAINT on my last tank, and just averaged 14.5 mpg. WTF.

  • 2 weeks later...
nonotme42 Enthusiast

nonotme42

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think I'll do the TB cleanout at 100k. I'm sure it's a lot easier to remove with the drive by wire motor replacing the TPS, IAC, and throttle cables. I suppose I'll look into that and make sure there will be no surprises with the motor though...if its easy to separate from the TB to clean, etc

 

As far as Seafoam Goes....its been one of the best wrenches in my toolbox for quite a few vehicles. However...on the 2004 MY Gen III 5300, at least in particular, seems to have been designed with a complete lack of vacuum lines. I guess it's good...removes an entire section of complication from the engine design, so..I can't argue with it too much...but it does hinder one of the most effective ways to get Seafoam into the engine quickly. I might just get a new can of aresol GM Top Engine cleaner, take off the intake tube and go at it right at the throttle plate. I imagine the engine will run a bit strange without the MAF having air go past it, but, we'll see.

 

Plugs and wires. Well, I've pretty much come to the conclusion...ethanol has probably been the main culprit in lowering the high mileage interval on those...so I'll be doing those sometime soon, but I might just wait and do it all at one interval..say..75k. Right around when I'll be doing my next amsoil change, and next transmission pan drop. I'll make a day of it.

jblakeney Senior Enthusiast

jblakeney

Posted
Posted
thanks for the responses.

 

Yes, I forgot to mention, I clean the MAF on my vehicles every 20k.

 

I don't use premium fuel, I only use 87, but have, before, gone with a small stint (5 fillups or so) of premium from one station or another to see if that affects my mileage, as well as stints on non-ethanol fuels (when they still had the handful around here before the mandation went into effect, and I can say for sure that while the ethanol did indeed make a difference, it wasn't contributing significantly, because on a road trip I made up to New York May 2008, I averaged between 16.9 and 22 mpg, and every single station had up to 10% ethanol. Trust me though, I absolutely HATE the idea of ethanol altogether...its not a solution to a damn thing.

 

However, I have no problem believing that quite possibly, ethanol affected the long duration maintenance intervals that GM called for on this truck, one way or another.

 

And as far as the ignition wires go, yes, normally, I'd go with Delco, as normally, OE is a superior product, but MSD Super Conductor wires specifically are some of the highest quality aftermarket wires on the market besides Napa Belden. They're the absolute lowest resistance available, and the highest shielded to prevent any and nearly all electronic interferance. And since they're not INSANELY expensive, I can't justify knowing about them and not using them. But that's of course, an entirely separate conversation.

 

I've been driving like an absolute SAINT on my last tank, and just averaged 14.5 mpg. WTF.

 

MSD is performance aftermarket

 

NAPA Beldon is aftermarket.... They will beat any other aftermarket in ohms test..... Try em... They are good.

 

NAPA Jobber in Mississippi

Jbo

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,098 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Joke Thread

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

    • Grumpy Bear
      The Peckish Synapse

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      The Peckish Synapse

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • richard wysong
      Electrical Problem - solved

      By richard wysong · Posted

      Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...