Jump to content

Tune Up Intervals?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey fellas, haven't been around recently, but it's been nuts.

 

Anyways, I keep track of my fuel purchases and economy like a hawk. Not the DIC economy, which tends to be extremely optimistic, but the actual fuel in, calculated numbers. But this isn't about the DIC. What it is about is that last year, I averaged 15.95 mpg. This year, 13.95. Exactly the same conditions, same driving patterns, etc. It also doesn't seem to idle with the same smoothness as when I got it with 31k. It's now got 65,700. It also has a tendency to not start the first time when I hit it my remote start. Once or twice, actually didn't start twice, and it has no effect whether its hot or cold. To the best of my knowledge, GM's recommendation is 100k for plugs and wires, and absolutely everything else on the truck is up to date. I use 0W-30 Amsoil SSO in the engine (Currently at 10k), Dex VI and a WIX filter (Now at 15k) in the transmission with a B&M cooler, Mobil1 75W-90 in both differentials (At 15k), GM AutoTrak II in the transfer case (At 15k), only Shell or Chevron (top tier) fuels, along with Techron concentrate or Seafoam every 5k miles. Air filter is a new Purolator PureONE, PCV is new, obviously can't get to the fuel filter, and all that's really left is the plugs and wires....am I forgetting anything else? I really don't want to do a tuneup yet if that's not going to fix my problem...since I'm going to have to use Delco Iridiums and MSD wires (I have a serious problem with buying cheap replacement fluids and parts). I suppose it could use a tune, and maybe I could squeeze a bit out that way, in combination with the new plugs and wires, but I just want to verify I'm not missing anything.

Posted

Try running regular (87) grade gas. You are literally pouring you money down the drain by running higher grade fuel. It will not hurt any. Not sure if that will help the mileage, but why not try.

 

And how about the MAF?? (like posted above.) Also the throttle plate...

 

Use the AC Delco wires. There is nothing wrong with them. Sometimes you pay more for the aftermarket name, and get a less quality product. (MSD.)

 

 

 

Hey fellas, haven't been around recently, but it's been nuts.

 

Anyways, I keep track of my fuel purchases and economy like a hawk. Not the DIC economy, which tends to be extremely optimistic, but the actual fuel in, calculated numbers. But this isn't about the DIC. What it is about is that last year, I averaged 15.95 mpg. This year, 13.95. Exactly the same conditions, same driving patterns, etc. It also doesn't seem to idle with the same smoothness as when I got it with 31k. It's now got 65,700. It also has a tendency to not start the first time when I hit it my remote start. Once or twice, actually didn't start twice, and it has no effect whether its hot or cold. To the best of my knowledge, GM's recommendation is 100k for plugs and wires, and absolutely everything else on the truck is up to date. I use 0W-30 Amsoil SSO in the engine (Currently at 10k), Dex VI and a WIX filter (Now at 15k) in the transmission with a B&M cooler, Mobil1 75W-90 in both differentials (At 15k), GM AutoTrak II in the transfer case (At 15k), only Shell or Chevron (top tier) fuels, along with Techron concentrate or Seafoam every 5k miles. Air filter is a new Purolator PureONE, PCV is new, obviously can't get to the fuel filter, and all that's really left is the plugs and wires....am I forgetting anything else? I really don't want to do a tuneup yet if that's not going to fix my problem...since I'm going to have to use Delco Iridiums and MSD wires (I have a serious problem with buying cheap replacement fluids and parts). I suppose it could use a tune, and maybe I could squeeze a bit out that way, in combination with the new plugs and wires, but I just want to verify I'm not missing anything.

Posted

I've had 1.8 MPG drop over the past year. I was talking with the manager of the local fuel depot/distribution station, an acquaintance through a mutual friend and he explained that the ethanol mix in fuels has negatively affected MPG. He said that the gas is 84/85 octane and the added ethanol boosts the octane to 87 in low grade. He recommends running mid-grade as this is simply a blend of low and high grade and will burn better. He explained why and went into a whole rant about the ethanol its ill effects on all engines. He showed me the storage tank where it's stored before they blend it, the tank was covered in this thick black residue, I asked what it was, his reply was, it’s mold, plant/food bi-product and then more ranting. He also said that ethanol was the alternative to high gas prices, and because it has to be trucked everywhere the price per gallon is over $3.00. This is what was told to me, and hope I conveyed it correctly. I don't have anything to validate it, but it sounded good at the time.

Posted

thanks for the responses.

 

Yes, I forgot to mention, I clean the MAF on my vehicles every 20k.

 

I don't use premium fuel, I only use 87, but have, before, gone with a small stint (5 fillups or so) of premium from one station or another to see if that affects my mileage, as well as stints on non-ethanol fuels (when they still had the handful around here before the mandation went into effect, and I can say for sure that while the ethanol did indeed make a difference, it wasn't contributing significantly, because on a road trip I made up to New York May 2008, I averaged between 16.9 and 22 mpg, and every single station had up to 10% ethanol. Trust me though, I absolutely HATE the idea of ethanol altogether...its not a solution to a damn thing.

 

However, I have no problem believing that quite possibly, ethanol affected the long duration maintenance intervals that GM called for on this truck, one way or another.

 

And as far as the ignition wires go, yes, normally, I'd go with Delco, as normally, OE is a superior product, but MSD Super Conductor wires specifically are some of the highest quality aftermarket wires on the market besides Napa Belden. They're the absolute lowest resistance available, and the highest shielded to prevent any and nearly all electronic interferance. And since they're not INSANELY expensive, I can't justify knowing about them and not using them. But that's of course, an entirely separate conversation.

 

I've been driving like an absolute SAINT on my last tank, and just averaged 14.5 mpg. WTF.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I think I'll do the TB cleanout at 100k. I'm sure it's a lot easier to remove with the drive by wire motor replacing the TPS, IAC, and throttle cables. I suppose I'll look into that and make sure there will be no surprises with the motor though...if its easy to separate from the TB to clean, etc

 

As far as Seafoam Goes....its been one of the best wrenches in my toolbox for quite a few vehicles. However...on the 2004 MY Gen III 5300, at least in particular, seems to have been designed with a complete lack of vacuum lines. I guess it's good...removes an entire section of complication from the engine design, so..I can't argue with it too much...but it does hinder one of the most effective ways to get Seafoam into the engine quickly. I might just get a new can of aresol GM Top Engine cleaner, take off the intake tube and go at it right at the throttle plate. I imagine the engine will run a bit strange without the MAF having air go past it, but, we'll see.

 

Plugs and wires. Well, I've pretty much come to the conclusion...ethanol has probably been the main culprit in lowering the high mileage interval on those...so I'll be doing those sometime soon, but I might just wait and do it all at one interval..say..75k. Right around when I'll be doing my next amsoil change, and next transmission pan drop. I'll make a day of it.

Posted
thanks for the responses.

 

Yes, I forgot to mention, I clean the MAF on my vehicles every 20k.

 

I don't use premium fuel, I only use 87, but have, before, gone with a small stint (5 fillups or so) of premium from one station or another to see if that affects my mileage, as well as stints on non-ethanol fuels (when they still had the handful around here before the mandation went into effect, and I can say for sure that while the ethanol did indeed make a difference, it wasn't contributing significantly, because on a road trip I made up to New York May 2008, I averaged between 16.9 and 22 mpg, and every single station had up to 10% ethanol. Trust me though, I absolutely HATE the idea of ethanol altogether...its not a solution to a damn thing.

 

However, I have no problem believing that quite possibly, ethanol affected the long duration maintenance intervals that GM called for on this truck, one way or another.

 

And as far as the ignition wires go, yes, normally, I'd go with Delco, as normally, OE is a superior product, but MSD Super Conductor wires specifically are some of the highest quality aftermarket wires on the market besides Napa Belden. They're the absolute lowest resistance available, and the highest shielded to prevent any and nearly all electronic interferance. And since they're not INSANELY expensive, I can't justify knowing about them and not using them. But that's of course, an entirely separate conversation.

 

I've been driving like an absolute SAINT on my last tank, and just averaged 14.5 mpg. WTF.

 

MSD is performance aftermarket

 

NAPA Beldon is aftermarket.... They will beat any other aftermarket in ohms test..... Try em... They are good.

 

NAPA Jobber in Mississippi

Jbo

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 718 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
    • you might read through the info on gmupfitter.com for your truck, to find a good power source.
    • Melling I believe is/was the OEM on the lifters who explored this problem some years ago. The white paper they generated on the topic indicated two items of note when I read it. 1.) They only fail on the switch. Prevent the switch, prevent the failure. 2.) The majority fail due to deposits messing up the timing of that switch. Anyway that's what I got from it.    Mine have always been active, 195K+ now, and my oil maintenance is surgically clean.    Of course this assumes good parts. That is no heat treat issue or machining flaws. I get comfortable that these issues are in the rearview mirror by about 30K. IMHO naturally. 
    • Yes, the key seems to be with the half tons that if it has the Z71, then it definitely has the two speed. What got me was that the two speed AND the lower geared towing package option could not be chosen together the last few years unless it was mated up to the 6.2. Want the 3.0 duramax and 3.73 tow gears ... nope, can't get the two speed transfer case ( neighbor son realized that after he had bought his used 3.0 half ton .. where the frick is the low range ? ! ).    I am still unsure which truck series, the half ton or the HD truck that the original poster is referring to for sure other than yes his question is in the HD section of this forum but that doesn't guarantee the question got asked in the right section.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...