Jump to content

Skyjacker 3" Lift?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a '08 Sierra and was looking at a Skyjacker 3" lift. That is all the lift I want and I was looking for opinions or experiences. Thanks for your constructive help.

Posted
I have a '08 Sierra and was looking at a Skyjacker 3" lift. That is all the lift I want and I was looking for opinions or experiences. Thanks for your constructive help.

How is the front lift attained with that kit? Hyper extended upper ball joints fail very quickly on the GMT900 trucks. Rear lift is no problem.

Posted
I have a '08 Sierra and was looking at a Skyjacker 3" lift. That is all the lift I want and I was looking for opinions or experiences. Thanks for your constructive help.

How is the front lift attained with that kit? Hyper extended upper ball joints fail very quickly on the GMT900 trucks. Rear lift is no problem.

 

 

 

Its a true 3". Lower crossmembers drop the LCA's and you install new knuckles. Diff is dropped and comes with new struts. Pretty nice kit IMO.

 

Edit: If you have autoride, they use spacers to retain the oem autoride struts.

Posted
Rough Country has a 3" lift kit out like that also.....Rough Country

 

Noooooooooooooooooooooo. Glorified leveling kit. Stay away. Still bad lower balljoint and tie rod angles. Not to mention changing the dynamics of the front suspension with the different UCA and balljoint angle.

 

I hate that kit :lol:

Posted

If I were you I would get the Rough Country 2" leveling kit and the Zone offroad 1.5" body lift. It is way cheaper and easier then the skyjacker kit. If you are going to pay for the 3" skyjacker you should just get the bigger 6" kit. I like my set up and it rides great. Only have $250-300 in to it. Way cheaper than the skyjacker!!

Posted
Over $1700 for 3" of lift?!? :lol:

 

That's why I said to get my setup for about $300 and have 3.5" of lift and save the $1400 for a set of rims and tires or just save the money.

Posted

I personally would never install a 2" spacer. Highest I would go is 1" and the max if recommend is 1.5"

 

 

Remember, they cost the same as a 6" susp kit because they come with all the same parts... Its a real suspension system, not a leveling kit

 

I was considering the skyjacker and the 4" CST lift, but was concerned about increasing the front driveshaft angle with my AWD system (could cause vibe issues and require More $$$ for a new one). ... So I went with the 3" body lift and couldn't be happier with how it turned out. I've had numerous people (both online and at work) shocked when they find out its a BL, these trucks really pull them off.

 

 

With that said, if you really only want 3" and can't swing the price of a suspension lift, on these trucks I'd recommend a 3"BL. And then you can alway throw a 1" spacer in the front to make it a total of 4".

Posted

if money is no issue(we all wish), go with your kit. if ur a little tight on cash, id say body. easy, fast, and looks good on nnbs.

Posted
Rough Country has a 3" lift kit out like that also.....Rough Country

 

Noooooooooooooooooooooo. Glorified leveling kit. Stay away. Still bad lower balljoint and tie rod angles. Not to mention changing the dynamics of the front suspension with the different UCA and balljoint angle.

 

I hate that kit :lol:

 

 

Yeah,I thought I remember reading on here that some guys were having issues with it.

Posted
Wow, thats the perfect Height I want, only 3in but the kit its the same price as GoRancho, and what about Skyjacker? Is as good as Rancho kits?

 

That rancho is a quality kit, but you will get 5.5 to 6" with it, and there's no way to turn it down to 4" like on torsion bar trucks. If you really only want 3 or 4 max, the rancho will be too tall (that was an issue for me, anything over 4" requires special inspection in NJ and I didn't want to deal with that again)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,842
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    CaptainDad
    Newest Member
    CaptainDad
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 484 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...