Jump to content

Ipod/iphone Connection To Gmt-900 Stereo


robbd

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just bought myself an 07 Sierra NBS, and I know I can use the aux headphone jack to play music from my iPhone. Now laws where I'm from state that you cannot use a handheld device while driving or your getting a Nice $175 fine. So I have been looking into options other than the headphone aux jack to play my iPod thru my Stereo cause I dont need to be paying the fine for grabbing my phone to switch songs. My Girlfriends car is a Chev cobalt with somewhat the same style stereo setup only hers has a USB jack on the opposite side from the Headphone Aux Jack. I was wondering if there was a stock deck from GM that I could replace mine or if anyone knew if this option of the iSimple by Tranzit works to the point of being able to switch songs with the Steering Wheel/Deck Controls

 

Link - iSimple by Tranzit

Posted

That unit is a wired FM modulator to connect an iPod/iPhone to a vehicle without an aux input jack. It plugs in at the base of the antenna jack at the back of the head unit and switches off the antenna when it detects an audio signal from the iPod to reduce noise and improve sound quality.

 

However, you'd still have to use the iPhone/iPod for controls AND the sound quality of the aux input jack would be better than using that device with an FM modulator.

Posted

As advised above that isimple thing your looking at will still require you to use you ipod/iphone, no advantage over what you have now, in fact it will be worse sound quality because it will no longer be a direct input. There are some options for what you want to do from many after market companies. I have used the PAC part a few times, good piece but a little complicated to get the feel for and you need to buy a specific harness for your vehicle separately, the soundgate part works well and is easier to operate, plus it will come will all the cables you need, i haven't used the PIE and neuclues parts but have heard that they are qwerky in operation at times and are built by the same people. there are a few on-line places you can buy these parts from.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
<br />As advised above that isimple thing your looking at will still require you to use you ipod/iphone, no advantage over what you have now, in fact it will be worse sound quality because it will no longer be a direct input. There are some options for what you want to do from many after market companies. I have used the PAC part a few times, good piece but a little complicated to get the feel for and you need to buy a specific harness for your vehicle separately, the soundgate part works well and is easier to operate, plus it will come will all the cables you need, i haven't used the PIE and neuclues parts but have heard that they are qwerky in operation at times and are built by the same people. there are a few on-line places you can buy these parts from.<br />
<br /><br /><br />

 

 

Use This

http://pac-audio.com/productDetails.aspx?P...p;CategoryID=22

Posted
<br />As advised above that isimple thing your looking at will still require you to use you ipod/iphone, no advantage over what you have now, in fact it will be worse sound quality because it will no longer be a direct input. There are some options for what you want to do from many after market companies. I have used the PAC part a few times, good piece but a little complicated to get the feel for and you need to buy a specific harness for your vehicle separately, the soundgate part works well and is easier to operate, plus it will come will all the cables you need, i haven't used the PIE and neuclues parts but have heard that they are qwerky in operation at times and are built by the same people. there are a few on-line places you can buy these parts from.<br />
<br /><br /><br />

 

 

Use This

http://pac-audio.com/productDetails.aspx?P...p;CategoryID=22

 

 

The pac setup is what I got in 08, they were only avail on an ebay store. I really wanted to keep radio stock and be able to read my ipod screen off my stock display. Unless they improved the compatability, ipod navigation with the stereo controls absolutely stank. Additionally, I just got an Ipod touch, and it will not charge when plugged in like my old ipod. The only saving grace is one can select IPOD or aux, and aux allows you to use the ipod controls, rather than the radio (although I guess that would defeat the purpose for the original posters' needs)

Posted

I put the PAC in my 09 as well. I really like how well it works with my Ipod, havent tried running an itouch or iphone with this through.

 

Nootrom: Did you try flashing it to the latest firmware on pacs website? Maybe that might help.

 

Install took about 1 hour since it has to be plugged into the back of the radio. But once done, it works great with the OEM controls including the steering wheel button. You can change and scroll albums, artists, tracks, etc. on the radio screen using without having to take you hands off the wheel.

 

Found it online at some radom website for around 100 bucks so it wasnt alot of money either.

 

Ernie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 404 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...