Jump to content

"DO NOT FORGET"

Shotgun

By Shotgun
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

Shotgun Enthusiast

Shotgun

Posted
Posted

"DO NOT FORGET"

>

> I sat in a movie theater watching "Schindler's List," asked myself, "Why

> didn't the Jews fight back?"

>

> Now I know why.

>

> I sat in a movie theater, watching "Pearl Harbor" and asked myself, "Why

> weren't we prepared?"

>

> Now I know why.

>

> Civilized people cannot fathom, much less predict, the actions of evil

> people.

>

> On September 11, dozens of capable airplane passengers allowed themselves

> to be overpowered by a handful of poorly armed terrorists because they did

> not comprehend the depth of hatred that motivated their captors.

>

> On September 11, thousands of innocent people were murdered because too

> many Americans naively reject the reality that some nations are dedicated

> to the dominance of others. Many political pundits, pacifists and media

> personnel want us to forget the carnage. They say we must focus on the

> bravery of the rescuers and ignore the cowardice of the killers. They

> implore us to understand the motivation of the perpetrators. Major

> television stations have announced they will assist the healing process by

> not replaying devastating footage of the planes crashing into the Twin

> Towers.

>

> I will not be manipulated.

>

> I will not pretend to understand.

>

> I will not forget.

>

> I will not forget the liberal media who abused freedom of the press to

> kick our country when it was vulnerable and hurting.

>

> I will not forget that CBS anchor Dan Rather preceded President Bush's

> address to the nation with the snide remark, "No matter how you feel about

> him, he is still our president."

>

> I will not forget that ABC TV anchor Peter Jennings questioned President

> Bush's motives for not returning immediately to Washington, DC and

> commented, "We're all pretty skeptical and cynical about Washington."

>

> And I will not forget that ABC's Mark Halperin warned if reporters weren't

> informed of every little detail of this war, they aren't "likely -- nor

> should they be expected -- to show deference."

>

> I will not isolate myself from my fellow Americans by pretending an attack

> on the USS Cole in Yemen was not an attack on the United States of

> America.

>

> I will not forget the Clinton administration equipped Islamic terrorists

> and their supporters with the world's most sophisticated

> telecommunications equipment and encryption technology, thereby

> compromising America's ability to trace terrorist radio, cell phone, land

> lines, faxes and modem communications.

>

> I will not be appeased with pointless, quick retaliatory strikes like

> those perfected by the previous administration.

>

> I will not be comforted by "feel-good, do nothing" regulations like the

> silly "Have your bags been under your control?" question at the airport.

>

> I will not be influenced by so called,"antiwar demonstrators" who exploit

> the right of expression to chant anti-American obscenities.

>

> I will not forget the moral victory handed the North Vietnamese by

> American war protesters who reviled and spat upon the returning soldiers,

> airmen, sailors and Marines.

>

> I will not be softened by the wishful thinking of pacifists who chose

> reassurance over reality.

>

> I will embrace the wise words of Prime Minister Tony Blair who told Labor

> Party conference, "They have no moral inhibition on the slaughter of the

> innocent. If they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000, does anyone

> doubt they would have done so and rejoiced in it?

>

> There is no compromise possible with such people, no meeting of minds, no

> point of understanding with such terror. Just a choice: defeat it or be

> defeated by it. And defeat it we must!"

>

> I will force myself to:

>

>

> -hear the weeping

> -feel the helplessness

> -imagine the terror

> -sense the panic

> -smell the burning flesh

> - experience the loss

> - remember the hatred.

>

> I sat in a movie theater, watching "Private Ryan" and asked myself, "Where

> did they find the courage?"

>

> Now I know.

>

> We have no choice. Living without liberty is not living.

>

> -- Ed Evans, MGySgt., USMC (Ret.)

> Not as lean, Not as mean, But still a Marine

General Lee 01 Senior Enthusiast

General Lee 01

Posted
Posted

Major

> television stations have announced they will assist the healing process by

> not replaying devastating footage of the planes crashing into the Twin

> Towers.

 

Well, I don't see how that will help anything.

 

If we Remember September 11th, then those images are already etched in our minds.

 

Whether or not they show the footage or not, we will all still see it.

 

> I will not forget that CBS anchor Dan Rather preceded President Bush's

> address to the nation with the snide remark, "No matter how you feel about

> him, he is still our president."

 

 

I don't get this one, is the writer agreeing with what Dan Rather said, or Disagreeing? ???

sincityZ71 Senior Enthusiast

sincityZ71

Posted
Posted
> I will not forget that CBS anchor Dan Rather preceded President Bush's

> address to the nation with the snide remark, "No matter how you feel about

> him, he is still our president."

 

 

I don't get this one, is the writer agreeing with what Dan Rather said, or Disagreeing? ???

He is disagreeing with Dan Rather, that is why he called it a snide remark.  He is just saying how he will never forget this stupid, petty remark that stupid liberal jack@ss said about our President.

 

That is a good post Shotgun, I fully agree with it.  I have great respect for Tony Blair too, he seems to actually understand this and has his head out of his @ss and here in reality, a world where there are people who see nothing wrong with slaughtering thousands of innocent people for their so-called 'religious' war...

 

Nuke'em till they glow, then shoot'em in the dark  :(

TheScaryGuy Enthusiast

TheScaryGuy

Posted
Posted

petty remark that stupid liberal jack@ss said about our President

 

Sad thing is he's still where he was before 9/11 as he is now.  In fighting in his cabnet(sp?), world pissed off at him, and in way over his head.  Then again thats just coming from a centralist point of view.

sincityZ71 Senior Enthusiast

sincityZ71

Posted
Posted

Sad thing is he's still where he was before 9/11 as he is now.  In fighting in his cabnet(sp?), world pissed off at him, and in way over his head.  Then again thats just coming from a centralist point of view.

Yeah, but what President hasn't had issues and fighting within the ranks, been way in over their heads, and certainly there hasn't been a President yet who hasn't pissed of the world.  It is the American way... :(

HillHound Senior Enthusiast

HillHound

Posted
Posted
petty remark that stupid liberal jack@ss said about our President

 

Sad thing is he's still where he was before 9/11 as he is now.  In fighting in his cabnet(sp?), world pissed off at him, and in way over his head.  Then again thats just coming from a centralist point of view.

In way over his head, eh?   ???

 

Can you convince me of one single living American who could possibly be in Bush's shoes at this moment who would not be in over his head??  Albert Gore??  Maybe even Hillary-she wants to run for president one day!  How about Ralph Nader or Ross Perot?  

 

I'm thankful Bush is in there right now and not one of the other kooks that have run for the office in the past few elections, including Billy Clinton (who woefully mismanaged the anti-terror effort for 8yrs).  I can think of one other American who would take care of business right now, and thats President Reagan but his time is passed.

MarkD Senior Enthusiast

MarkD

Posted
Posted

Quote (TheScaryGuy @ Sep. 10 2002,1:21)

Quote  

petty remark that stupid liberal jack@ss said about our President

 

 

Sad thing is he's still where he was before 9/11 as he is now.  In fighting in his cabnet(sp?), world pissed off at him, and in way over his head.  Then again thats just coming from a centralist point of view.

 

In way over his head, eh?    

 

Can you convince me of one single living American who could possibly be in Bush's shoes at this moment who would not be in over his head??  Albert Gore??  Maybe even Hillary-she wants to run for president one day!  How about Ralph Nader or Ross Perot?  

 

I'm thankful Bush is in there right now and not one of the other kooks that have run for the office in the past few elections, including Billy Clinton (who woefully mismanaged the anti-terror effort for 8yrs).  I can think of one other American who would take care of business right now, and thats President Reagan but his time is passed.

 

:thumb:  :(   I wish I knew of a smiley that would salute!

lauriet1 Enthusiast

lauriet1

Posted
Posted

I'm thankful Bush is in there right now and not one of the other kooks that have run for the office in the past few elections, including Billy Clinton (who woefully mismanaged the anti-terror effort for 8yrs).  I can think of one other American who would take care of business right now, and thats President Reagan but his time is passed..

 

Second that one Hillhound - Gee, just think, we almost had Hanging Chad Counting Al Gore as our prez during this and that's one SCARY Thought :(

Stepside Z Senior Enthusiast

Stepside Z

Posted
Posted
Ok guys you may or may not agree with me on this but here goes. We should never heal completly. If we do then we will forget. When we forget the door gets opened for another attack. I will never forget what has happened.
boomer8800 Enthusiast

boomer8800

Posted
Posted

I'm sorry but this issue is getting old real fast. If it wasn't for the fact that we have the tech to capture and replay this event over and over and over and over again. (Which is good for news stations and Politicians for there own personal agendas) we could get over this and get on with what more important like killing all these camel jockey bastards.

 

What about Pearl Harbor more people were killed there in one day then 911, how about the civil war there were battles where way more people were killed in one day then 911. I don't find in history where the media or people dragged the exploitation of the eventfor this long and still going. I mean how long is long enough??? Where do we draw the line?? Not counting the family or friends of course..

Shotgun Enthusiast

Shotgun

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Boomer,your post is pure BS.Dec.7,1941,the day the Japaneese bombed pearl harbor is A day that is still remembered in this household and I believe most americans feel the same way.The US and the UK declared war on Japan on Dec.8th.This day,61 years later is still mentioned in the news every year.Most people killed in the bombing of Pearl Harbor were military personel and not civilians,which consisted of children,wifes,and grandparents.I consider it to be a good thing that yesterday millions of people around the world were reminded of what happend in this country a year ago.I have noticed wavering support for military action in the middle east around this country,especially from left wing liberals who are only worried about how much more of my hard earned check they can give away to crack heads and lazy people on welfare. Some people say peace is the answer,If this attitude continues to grow you might as well start preparing because if we don't put a stop to chemical and atomic weponds getting into the hands of terrorists,the 3000 people that died on 911 is only the tip of the iceberg.

 

Innocent people were murdered on our soil Boomer,not on an island in the south pacific,I am not taking anything away from what happend in Peal Harbor,No one respects our service men and women more than I do,they knowingly take the risk,they choose to.They are not murdered as were the people killed on 911.......It is a big deal Boomer,it is to me.If you don't understand this you don't belong here,you don't deserve the freedoms you have because the people who died on Dec.7,1941 died for your freedom!   :eek:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Mykel544
      New Guy from Oklahoma

      By Mykel544 · Posted

      Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • newdude
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
    • Atlas
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Atlas · Posted

      Coming back to this question, *my* answer is no, it's not something about which I'm knowledgeable. I'd need to read up on it and understand how it applies to we the consumer and our oil change regimens.   One of your bolded points is that fresh oil in a container contains particulate matter. I don't think I'm surprised, maybe a little bit that it seems to be a major factor, but there's manufacturing process involved in oil and it doesn't exactly come in sterile packaging.    How much is filtered out on the first start by an acceptable quality filter (AC Delco, as a baseline) filter?   On the GM OLM discussion, just saying that the "number of engine revolutions" appears to be a factor in oil life... cough... maybe driving style *does* matter.    
    • GMTruckGuy74
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By GMTruckGuy74 · Posted

      GMC has been revising their trim level names over the past several years. Sierra Pro has taken over the Work Truck/SL trim name; Elevation has replaced the SLE (and with the Premium upgrade, SLT) in the SUV lineup of late; AT4/AT4 Ultimate and Denali/Denali Ultimate have been the top of the line in off road luxury and on-road luxury respectively for the full-size pickups and SUVs.    SL, SLE, SLT nomenclatures are gone in the Sierra truck line. Mark my words.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...