Jump to content

Ruined My (new To Me) Car Fenders


tanked_darren

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah so I was trying to turn around on a dirt road, it was 12 at night and I was 60km from camp (don't ask booze fueled). Long story short, I was going to turn around and put the nose in a ditch - high centered, 6 hours (the longest 6 of my life I thought I was screwed!) digging with my bare hands and stacking dirt/rocks under the front tires and I was free! I had to stab the gas while pushing the car as well, almost got ran over when she got free! Yep I'm an idiot. There was no way of jacking the car other than the fenders. (It was buried and the spare tire jack doesn't give much clearance)

2011-09-04124714.jpg

2011-09-04124701.jpg

Posted

Dont feel bad i know a guy who just got a 2000ish wrangler jeep for a steal and after 20+ beers he drove it in the lake at 7 am and sunk it and has to get a shit ton of work done to it

Posted
Dont feel bad i know a guy who just got a 2000ish wrangler jeep for a steal and after 20+ beers he drove it in the lake at 7 am and sunk it and has to get a shit ton of work done to it

My friend said it best when he woke up "you did what you had to do, otherwise you'd still be walkin'"

Posted

Sounds like the 6 hours you spent diggin possibly saved your life or someone elses.

 

When did it become "cool" to brag about tearing your car up while driving drunk? Then again, you call yourself "tanked Darren" so this should come as no surprise.

Posted
Sounds like the 6 hours you spent diggin possibly saved your life or someone elses.

 

When did it become "cool" to brag about tearing your car up while driving drunk? Then again, you call yourself "tanked Darren" so this should come as no surprise.

 

 

its cuz hes north of the 48

Posted

I hope your not out here beggin for sympathy man, cause I don't think you'll get much. You're alive, and not in a jail cell. Hopefully this will serve as a lesson in the future for you the next time you think about grabbing the keys after being "fueled by booze".

Posted
I hope your not out here beggin for sympathy man, cause I don't think you'll get much. You're alive, and not in a jail cell. Hopefully this will serve as a lesson in the future for you the next time you think about grabbing the keys after being "fueled by booze".

 

 

i agree.. I hate people you drink and drive... i was born early cuz my mom was tboned by a drunk driver when she was 8 months pregant with me... people who drive drunk should be hung

Posted
I hope your not out here beggin for sympathy man, cause I don't think you'll get much. You're alive, and not in a jail cell. Hopefully this will serve as a lesson in the future for you the next time you think about grabbing the keys after being "fueled by booze".

 

 

100% agreed.

 

 

This thread deserves a big :rolleyes:

Posted

This was on private land. I don't promote drinking and driving, let alone do it. I was just sharing my misfortune of having to jack the fenders.

Posted
Private land makes no difference. In Canada you can get a dui on your lawnmower cutting your grass

I'd be in trouble.....I have what I call "a six-pack lawn"......usual what you see scattered on the lawn as I mow along......of course I pick them up when I'm done

Posted
Yeah so I was trying to turn around on a dirt road, it was 12 at night and I was 60km from camp (don't ask booze fueled). Long story short, I was going to turn around and put the nose in a ditch - high centered, 6 hours (the longest 6 of my life I thought I was screwed!) digging with my bare hands and stacking dirt/rocks under the front tires and I was free! I had to stab the gas while pushing the car as well, almost got ran over when she got free! Yep I'm an idiot. There was no way of jacking the car other than the fenders. (It was buried and the spare tire jack doesn't give much clearance)

2011-09-04124714.jpg

2011-09-04124701.jpg

 

 

Tanked,,,, your name appears fitting, :rolleyes: . Anyways, i know you were at least sobered up after 6 hours of digging that thing out. Could have been worse bud, laugh it off.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...