Jump to content

new pump module incorrect fuel gauge readings??


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just replaced the fuel pump module in my 2000 silverado with a new Delphi part and now either my gauge doesn't read correctly or I can not completely fill the tank. When the tank is supposedly full it now reads slightly to the left of full and refilling it when empty I can only get 20-21 gallons in it when I used to get 24 or 25. (26 gallon tank). I'm thinking that must have either missed a step when installing the float or maybe the anti-cephen tube at the filler hose must have not have been put back in right preventing it from filling completely. Anyone ever run into this??

 

I'm thinking about letting it run completely out of fuel to test the gauge.. Ofcourse, I'll have to carry around a gas can until it does.

Posted

Couldn't have clock pump wrong.. the fuel lines wouldn't have connected. I' haven't had the time to take it back apart yet. just curious if anyone else has ever run into this.. :driving:

Posted

never had the issue. I've done this pump a couple times (including once just because I broke the damn fuel level sensor, be careful with it! lol)

 

on edit:

did you drop the tank or remove the bed? I always removed the bed, less likely to pinch anything that way and much easier to work on it from that angle.

Posted

Dropped tank (didn't have help). That's why I'm entertaining the idea that a misplaced anti-siphon tube may be the cause..but If I have to do it again I'll slide the bed.

 

. Correct New ACDELCO pump with pig tail conversion....

 

If I follow the fuel gauge's recommendation and fill-up when the "low fuel" light comes on, I've lost about 4 gallons of capasity or 80 miles of range per tank. 26 gal tank only takes 20 to 20.5 gal to fill up. Before it would take 24 or so.

 

Like the Ben Franklin qoute...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,858
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    mark2
    Newest Member
    mark2
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 648 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It is working as designed.  NHT and non NHT trucks have the same exact transmission cooling setup.  NHT just gets a larger radiator.     The transmission cooler loop on these is as follows.     -Transmission out goes into an oil to water heat exchanger (item #1 in the first illustration below).  This exchanger has engine coolant opposite the transmission fluid and uses engine coolant to warm and then regulate the transmission fluid temperature when its in the operating window.   - From the cooler it goes to a thermal bypass valve (item #11 in the 2nd illustration below).  If the ATF has not reached the temp to open the bypass (194F), it loops back.   - When it reaches 194F, the thermostat opens and ATF then flows out to the oil to air auxiliary cooler (item #17 in the 2nd illustration) at the front of the truck.  From there it goes back to the transmission.     Your only fix would be to swap for the PPE thermal bypass delete block which will open the loop to the aux cooler all the time.  It will STILL run warm, probably 170-200F, but that's as low as you'll get it as its still flowing through the oil to water exchanger.      
    • Most say the oil temperature needs to above the boiling point of water to rid it of moisture and long enough to dry it. Many think that is about a hour at 212 F or more. Those people have never line dried cloths in a Midwest winter. Leave a pan of water sitting on the counter and eventually it all evaporates. So heat drives the time it takes. Water in oil under 175 F, the Nitration initiation temperature, is a minimum then for temperature and samples I've done that use Karl Fisher method say about a hour (in a healthy well tuned motor) over 175 F will dry it to under 800 ppm. Low enough to not be much of a factor. Motors with weak rings will take longer and the colder the air temperature the longer it takes.   On a cold motor there is also the condensation temperature. Blowby gases that contain moisture are subject to that cold cylinder wall, like sweat on a glass of ice tea. But also subject to the Law of Partial Pressures. Wear studies by GM and the DOD  indicate wear is a real issue below 85 F and a concern to 140 F but doesn't become a minimal factor until about 160 F. You know this intuitively when you see water vapor exit the exhaust pipe until the system gets above the dew point. It isn't magic, it's physics and it fascinates me. I know you didn't ask but....I over share sometimes. 😉    You keep the Camaro's high and tight.  
    • Move further away.   Benefit of living out - none of our cars get short cycled, plenty of warm up time.   Curious how much time/temperature it takes to drive moisture/condensation out of the engine?
    • Switch a a 100% synthetic trans fluid, Amsoil works for me.
    • First of all sorry, I know there are a ton of transmission temperature threads...   My truck is a 2025 LZ0 High (10l89 10-speed) High Country with NHT max trailering package. The NHT package is supposed to have "enhanced cooling."   Normally the trans temp sits around 200. It seems like with any real stress it quickly jumps into the 220s (for example climbing a grade unloaded at lower speeds). I haven't towed much with this truck, but I'm concerned if it gets this hot unloaded.    I've tried a few different things to keep the temps down (tow/haul mode, sport mode, low range when that makes sense) and nothing seems to affect it.    I'm curious if others are the same behavior or if anyone has found techniques to keep the temps down. It seems like it just can't handle reduced airflow at lower speeds, even with relatively light loading.    Thanks!      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...