Jump to content

@#%* Dealership...gotta vent


Recommended Posts

Posted
I never asked to be compensated for any repairs....just upset how the front end can go from "no problem", to "You should of felt it, it is so bad' in 1000 miles, when I've been asking for them to check it for the past 9,000 miles at each Oil Change. The Drums were cut in house....they claim that the Lathe was screwed up.....how they didn't feel that pulsation during a road test I'll never know.....when slowing, the last 15MPH, you'd be rocking forward from the pulsation.....not sure how much meat they had to take off to fix them, but the brakes are fine now.......I also ran the truck up to 90 mph....not a shimmy, or a shake.....drives like new :thumbs:

 

 

I did not mean that you tried for full compensation, it was something someone else was inferring. It is something that has been a sore spot for me from when I was working on cars.

 

Having machined many drums in my career, you may want to have the drums measured now. There is a machine to spec, and a discard spec. The difference between the two numbers is usually about the normal wear that will occur in the life of the brakes. From what I can remember, it was something like .030 inches difference between machine to and discard at numbers for a drum around 10 inches in diameter.

 

The drum when new is one size, after the brakes have worn out, and the drums machined (assuming brakes were not down to metal) the drum should be measured to ensure it is still in a usable state. You should be able to get two or three break jobs done with machining on the original drums, again, assuming no metal on metal, and no severely distorted or hot spot drums. Having a machine job that put the drums out of round by the machine will take a lot of material to correct. Either take the truck to someone and have them measured, or take them off yourself and get them measured. If they are out of spec, they will go out of round easier due to less metal to disipate the heat. They may be fine, but, if they are not, you can get that corrected now for less than it will cost later.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...