Jump to content

Electronics IN 03 Trucks


Recommended Posts

Posted

So does anyone like the new electronics in the 2003 GMC Sierrras?  I personaly feel that GM tried a little too hard to get all the bells and whistles into there trucks and came up short.........

 

What do ya think

 

:fume:

Posted
I'm somewhat disappointed in the DIC in particular.  I didn't get the redundant steering wheel controls so I am limited on what I can get from the DIC.  I really don't understand why they couldn't have made more of those functions available to those of us who didn't get the wheel controls.  My dad had a LeSabre that had pushbuttons on the dash that allowed you to toggle through various functions of the DIC.  I especially would have like to have had the fuel mileage/range information.
Posted

Kind've like what Pontiac did on the Grand prix.  Put a big display above the radio and make some crapy GM buttons so that you could controll the DIC?  How else whould you make it so that you could controll the DIC without the stering wheel controls?  Backward keyfunctions like in the old days??

:uhoh:   We'll I just think they went too far with it?  I mean mirrors that adjust if you put it in reverse???

 

WOW  another reason to spend an extra 2k.  :cheers:

 

Thanks  But I'll pass

Posted
I guess I lucked out. The truck I took off the dealers lot had the steering wheel controls ($125 option). I disabled the "curb view" mode first thing. Is it possible that the DIC can be managed thru the radio controls?
Posted
all the extra crap is one of the things I really liked about the truck compared to the ford and dodge I was looking at that didn't have nearly all the extras, and for more
Posted
Well Cowboy I'll be honest, I wanted steering wheel controls but couldn't locate one with the color and other equipment I wanted.  Steering wheel controls are the perfect way to control those functions, but there wasn't one available, so I was out of luck.  As far as crappy GM buttons, the ones on my dad's LeSabre were nice, easy to operate and did not require optional equipment to get something that's already built into the instrument cluster.  So in other words if I had crappy buttons I could a least use whats in there.  Frankly the '03 is a better than my '01 in many areas so I'm not that upset.  I've had several GM products and so far this one has impressed me with its quality and extras.
Posted

I guess I should clarify a little...............

 

I'm not saying GM makes crappy stuff, I mean I did buy a brand spankning new 2002 GMC Sierra truck and I traded my 2000 GMC Sierra truck for it........  So I believe they make a good product.  It just seems like everytime some car manufacture comes out with more electronic gadgets there is more to go wrong and less the consumer can do about it.........  Back in the old days when I had my 3/4 Ton 84 GMC Sierra I could fix dang near everything on that truck without ever having to hook up a computer.  Know on the new  ones you can do all the diagnosis with  computers and they keep building thoose darn special tools...... :cheers:

 

So I guess my concern is that did they get all the bugs worked out of it?  So that is why I stayed with the 02.  When we start seeing all the TSB's on it I will be happy that I bought my 02..  If not great they did something right on the first try.......  Ford still hasn't gotten a-lot of things right.  However they've gotten some stuff right that GM can't figure out either..... :uhoh:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The “engine hours” display is there because the truck detects the key presence as you were thinking.   My first step would be to call a dealer service person and ask if this a known issue and how they deal with it. If you don’t get meaningful advice there, i would try a couple of DIY things before bringing it in for troubleshooting/repair.   It sounds like a mechanical key detection switch is stuck, but I have not actually seen what the internals look like. Maybe spray some Caig Deoxit (electrical contact cleaner) in the key hole and work the key in and out in case it’s an electrical contact cleanliness issue.  If that doesn’t work, next apply whatever lubricant GM recommends and work the key in and out a few times.    Good luck with it. 
    • Carbon on valves would be the least of my worries on a light duty, 1500-series pickup with 357k provided the engine still ran halfway decently. Everything else is likely toast, on its way out, or has already been mauled to death by cheap mechanics and backyard fixes. Those kinds of trucks nickel and dime a guy to death.   I wouldn't think having the top end cleaned once or twice would be a big deal on a 5.3 but maybe it is?
    • I wonder how much carbon is on all those high mileage valves?
    • When I had a Bumper subscription for a few days when I needed to run title histories on cars I was looking at, I decided to look up a few of my old/past vehicles.   My 2015 Silverado was still actively registered and it last sold in 2024 with 160k on the clock. No idea if that's on the original engine but someone's keeping it on the road or the original AFM stuff is still going.   It used 0w20. I remember feeding it Mobil 0w20 AFE for the first 30k of its life on <5k OCI's.     Edit: Just did a nationwide search on Autotrader for 2015-2025 Silverados with 5.3's and sorted by highest mileage first.   357k 352k 292k 291k 290k 277k 271k 268k 266k 259k 256k   High mileage on a modern 5.3 doesn't seem all that uncommon, but that's just searching mostly dealer ads on Autotrader. FB Marketplace has all kinds of high mileage 5.3's going back to 2007    
    • I can't say I have ever heard of someone getting that type of mileage out of a set of tires even though they rotated on a regular basis but without a doubt if the front end gets wear and those tires are no longer able to track straight it scrubs them off, and driving style and road surface make a huge difference as well.    However that is not what prompted me to comment as it was the new tire theme of sitting in storage waiting to be used scenario. I am sure some tires can last for quite a while in storage if its not too warm and out of the sunlight but unfortunately some tires the way they their rubber compound is formulated they can age and dry out even in a reasonably decent storage location. My brother ran into this maybe three years ago when he was looking at the tires that were on his dually truck and a combination of wear on the rear ones and noticing that the front tires had some cracks around the sidewall of the tire not far from the bead but he had replaced only the front ones not long ago with 2 of the remaining 6 he had left from the initial two sets of takeoffs he had all bought at the same time .... 10 years ago ! ( the years fly by, a truck that only gets used a bit to haul a camper during the summer and sits in a shed for a large part of the year ). That second set of 6 tires, two he had put on the front prior like I said and they had very little wear but those cracks were now present. So we go into the shed where the other 4 tires had been stored all this time and every one of them had the same cracks in the sidewalls and so in the end it amounted to throwing away 6 brand new but 10 year old takeoff tires into the dump that he got a deal on at a tire shop because they aged out. They were a Ford factory equipment BFG tire and those tires did not age well compared to some tires I've seen far older then that and did not show that type of aging. True, they always say up here anyway that 7 years is sort of a limit for age by rights, we don't have the intense prolonged heat that many of you have down in the states that just cook tires and depends on where the vehicle sits when not in use. GB, another words maybe had you bought a set of tires to store it would have been fine as long as you used them up fast enough but there are no guarantees when it comes to rubber, tires or of that other type stored in some guys wallets 😆
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...