Jump to content

GMT-900 DL3 Mirrors from 2007 Silvy LTZ located in MO

PhilB

By PhilB
in Classifieds (Buy/Sell/Trade)

Recommended Posts

PhilB Enthusiast

PhilB

Posted
Posted

I just installed my tow mirrors on my 2007 NBS Silverado LTZ. Initially I was going to keep the DL3s and reinstall them when I get rid of the truck. Sell the tow mirrors. But since I am going to have the switch door modules reprogrammed, I don't think I can switch them back w/o having to reprogram them back. PITA! So to recoup some of my expenses on the tow mirrors, I'll sell the DL3s. They are in very good condition. Bought the truck in 07/2007 and they have been on for 87k miles. As you can see in the pictures, they have been well taken care of. I added the small spot mirrors when I bought the truck. The spots are where they are because I didn't want to cover the turn signals. Heat works. Auto-dim works. Power fold works. The mirror caps are dark blue - the white lines on the mirror caps are reflections of the ceiling lights in the garage. I'm including the LTZ switch panel after I get the new switch panel programmed. That will be by the end of this month.

 

Asking $300 for the pair of DL3 mirrors. Asking $25 for the switch panel. Shipping additional. I'm located in zip 63025.

 

 

 

PhilB Enthusiast

PhilB

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The seat memory option on the LTZ is set up for the DL3 mirrors. With the tow mirrors on, pressing the memory button moves the mirrors to some different positions. The new door switches aren't programmed at all so when I put them in, nothing was working correctly. Some members have said that they can put up with repositioning the mirrors every time they get moved. I could probably live with it too but if and when I get rid of my truck, I want them working correctly for the next person.

PhilB Enthusiast

PhilB

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ttt

 

price lowered to $300 incl switch panel and shipping.

ddjozone Enthusiast

ddjozone

Posted
Posted

So the switch panel is programmed already to work with the dl3 mirrors? Trying to understand what you're saying clearly. I'm thinking about upgrading my 2012 lt tahoe mirrors. Is there anything else I'd need to do to get this to work fully with all the options power fold, heat etc?

PhilB Enthusiast

PhilB

Posted
  • Author
Posted

In the instructions that came with the tow mirrors, it said that I had to have the new switch panel AND the existing passenger panel reprogrammed for the DPN mirrors. IF I were to reinstall the DL3 mirrors, I have to reinstall the switch panel with the power fold switch back in, and have the passenger switch panel reprogrammed for the DL3 mirrors. I have no idea why they didn't make this a plug n play option... So to answer your question - yes the old switch panel is programmed for the DL3 mirrors. I am not sure what else you would need to do. I guess you could contact your dealership and ask them or maybe someone on the board would know.

ddjozone Enthusiast

ddjozone

Posted
Posted

I'm slow sorry. So the switch panel that you're including is the driver side panel that is programmed for the dl3 mirrors?

PhilB Enthusiast

PhilB

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That is correct. I am including the DL3 switch panel, with the power folding switch, that came with my truck when I bought it. I had the new switch panel installed and programmed last week.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • revmanii
      Looking at ordering a '26 WT because I want a std cab, std bed

      By revmanii · Posted

      Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      $2.20 E-85 down from $2.59 Around $3.80 for regular and about $5 on average for Premium.  Propane $3.99 a gallon. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...