Jump to content

2013 Feinstein 'ban' bill thrown out.........


Recommended Posts

Posted

Not even going to go to the floor for a vote. Things should get bakc to normal really quick.

 


Assault weapons ban dropped from Senate gun control bill Published March 19, 2013

The leader of the Democrat-controlled Senate on Tuesday dropped a proposed assault weapons ban from the chamber’s gun-control package – dealing a blow to supporters of the ban, though it could still come up for a vote.


The sponsor of the measure, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., revealed that Reid told her the proposed ban would not be in the initial package. Feinstein said she's "disappointed" with the decision, and is expected to nevertheless offer it as an amendment.


But the move by Reid to cut it from the main bill signals a lack of congressional support for a proposal that would not only revive, but strengthen, the decade-long ban that expired in 2004.


The proposed ban passed out of committee last week along with three other measures. The other three dealt with providing more school safety aid, expanding federal background checks on potential gun buyers and helping authorities prosecute illegal gun traffickers.


Feinstein has led the gun-control charge since President Obama called for federal legislation in the wake of the Newtown and other mass shootings.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/19/reid-cuts-assault-weapons-ban-from-senate-gun-control-bill-amid-waning-support/#ixzz2O0p9WezU

 

Posted

Good. Democrats don't want to lose their job over this.

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR MAXX using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

 

Posted

But most Dem's are seeing the light and know they wont get re-elected if they vote to ban our guns. I do agree with a stricter background check though

Posted

Don't get over confident and become complacent. Keep the heat on them!

Posted

The article I read said that it isn't going to be the main bill, but they may add it as an amendment to a different bill that does go to the floor for debate, like the one being proposed to crack down on straw purchases (for all the good that will do since its already against the law). One article also said that nationally in 2010 they only prosecuted 66 out of over 76,000 people that failed the background check. Reid has asked for data on how much they are enforcing existing laws since there isn't much point in even entertaining new laws if they wouldn't be enforced better than current ones.

Posted

All I know is in my county Feinstein was heavily voted against. I despise her and Barbara Boxer. But living in a republican county in a democratic state just means our votes dont count.

Posted

The article I read said that it isn't going to be the main bill, but they may add it as an amendment to a different bill that does go to the floor for debate, like the one being proposed to crack down on straw purchases (for all the good that will do since its already against the law). One article also said that nationally in 2010 they only prosecuted 66 out of over 76,000 people that failed the background check. Reid has asked for data on how much they are enforcing existing laws since there isn't much point in even entertaining new laws if they wouldn't be enforced better than current ones.

That is exactly why there is no need to make more restrictions. If you aren't going to enforce the current laws why make new ones? Doesn't make sense does it?

Posted

But most Dem's are seeing the light and know they wont get re-elected if they vote to ban our guns. I do agree with a stricter background check though

Agreed.. but thank god!

Posted

It was dropped because there was no way it could pass and they knew it. This stuff is about total control of the people, and the people are mot having it. We will no longer stand for our rights being taken away by these liberal nuts.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone4S

using Tapatalk

Posted

It was dropped in hopes of getting the rest of the bill passed. As I understand it, the "Universal Background Check" which sounds reasonable to most people is actually universal gun and gun owner registration which is much more damaging and dangerous than the "Assault Weapons Ban" part. So I think this is just a diversion to get what they really want - the holy grail of gun control - gun registration.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,972
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Whit.the.COB
    Newest Member
    Whit.the.COB
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,146 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep! This should be a pin somewhere as @pgamboa really dives into all of this. Thanks for reposting the link!
    • I did the new thermostat after doing a 'flip' for a year. Runs as cool one way as the other in the summer but in the winter there is a bit of a floor. Yellow with the new 70 C thermostat. My data over the life of the unit to date. Still need more cooler. Anyway that floor helped both winter fuel economy and shift quality in the winter. I found it a good balance.       
    • Evan Williams Bottled in Bond   So pouring the last of a bottle of Evan Williams Black label last night I set off the the state store for a refill only to be denied the by an empty shelf. Rats.    What the did have was a bottle of Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. 100 proof. Hum, a few bucks more but a known distiller. Lets have a swing at it. ( I have before )    Cracked it open and pour a serving over ice. Hum.... more heat, yes. More alcohol naturally. But the barreling not the proof brings the taste and this one came up short.    Oh is was familiar but the heat ran the barrel over like a Peterbilt runs over a squirrel. Could use a heavier toasting of the oak me thinks or perhaps a longer barreling. Who knows. But what I can say is ice or a water back isn't the answer. What kills one kills them both. Sad. It is a pleasant drink....if you have little to compare it to.  
    • I've had exactly one set of Bridgestone. Lasted five year and 125,000 miles and had I known better 15oK would have been a cake walk. I would have bought a like set had they not tripled in price since the first set. I removed them at said mileage with 5/32" remaining in dead even wear all four. They were fuel efficient, quite, comfortable and predictable.    Early on I got a very good alignment checked at least once a year, sometimes twice; kept the tires properly inflated, balanced and rotated. And I've found that many a tire issue can be avoided with great maintenance practices. Lot's of tire dealers will do rotation and balance (simple) for free for as long as you own the tire they sold you so no excuse not to.    Bead prep, alloy integrity and stem health have a huge impact on inflation stability. There are more mountings done poorly that perfectly. Finding a good tire guy is gold and as important as finding a tire you like.    That 3X price increase now two sets of "other tires' later is starting look like a bargain.      Bad maintenance kills more tires than bad tires. 
    • Atlas, you kill me As aggravating as a project like this can be you have been unable to hide your fascination with learning and using that angst against this beast like a Ninjitsu Master. It amuses you, admit it now.      BTW, love your writing style. 😉       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...