Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
What makes you think that?

 

Based on Txsweettea3's post that the same problem was observed on all 5 Ford Expeditions they drove. I did some google searching and yea, this issue isn't unique to the 2015 Yukon/Tahoe/Suburban.

Posted
What makes you think that?

 

Based on Txsweettea3's post that the same problem was observed on all 5 Ford Expeditions they drove. I did some google searching and yea, this issue isn't unique to the 2015 Yukon/Tahoe/Suburban.

 

 

Link?

Posted

Here's the deal: 3 of the 3 were stuffed with a material like a foam ear plug. The one in the rear was falling out and lead to the ear pressure again. The two in front were secure still. I have since taken them all out. Seriously, $80k. F this. Taking to dealer again tomorrow. Here are some pics as requested:

post-133828-0-39175300-1423493846.jpg

post-133828-0-89275000-1423493853.jpg

post-133828-0-77632600-1423493859.jpg

post-133828-0-39175300-1423493846.jpg

post-133828-0-89275000-1423493853.jpg

post-133828-0-77632600-1423493859.jpg

post-133828-0-39175300-1423493846.jpg

post-133828-0-89275000-1423493853.jpg

post-133828-0-77632600-1423493859.jpg

post-133828-0-39175300-1423493846.jpg

post-133828-0-89275000-1423493853.jpg

post-133828-0-77632600-1423493859.jpg

Posted

@jasondenali15: This is with your second Denali, the 2015i - correct?

 

--

Marc

Yes. I was a fool to think I could trust a company basically run by the government. I will never buy GM again. Gotta run, I have a doctor's appointment for the unending headache and dizziness caused by this vehicle.

Posted

Jasondenali15 – wrench mentioned dealers look at you folks as “buffoons” and “idiots” for trying to get some relief by using cotton or foam for this issue, so I won’t suggest another option. You stated in an earlier post that the plugs worked. Put the plugs back in and tape them in place this time, maybe the one falling out compensated for the other two. Doing nothing while still driving the truck will make your situation worse. Also, a post identified a dealer who changed out the rear end and the problem was solved, ask your dealer about this.

Posted

I agree, they probably do think we are buffoons or idiots. I certainly am. I bought the same vehicle twice in hopes they solved the issue from the initial launch. I am loyal to a fault, I suppose...

 

It seemed like the plugs did work with the pressure initially...perhaps until the one became loose. Having said that, the noise from the transmission was exceptionally loud. It was embarrassingly loud. I took a client out to lunch and he walked away saying it was the loudest vehicle he has ever been in. I am just not going to compromise comfort any longer with this vehicle. For $80 grand, I can drive countless other luxury-type vehicles without compromising anything.

 

I will ask about the rear end tomorrow...I have no idea what that means, but I will ask. I certainly appreciate the suggestions.

 

Sadly, we have to come to a forum full of people willing to come up with a solution and are trying new things. You guys are awesome! The people who made this flawed product are nowhere to be found on this thread anymore. Their lack of responses to our posts shows them as complicit to hiding something...the truth.

Posted (edited)

jasondenali15 - I'll send you a private message later this evening. Transmission louder after the plugs, correct?

Edited by The Zip
Posted

Man, I'd love to ride in your Yukon to hear this for myself. I'm about to spend $60K on a Yukon XL SLT or a Suburban Z71, seriouslly hope I don't experience this. I'm in a rental 2015 Burb LT right now and I think it's just fine.

Posted

Here's the deal: 3 of the 3 were stuffed with a material like a foam ear plug. The one in the rear was falling out and lead to the ear pressure again. The two in front were secure still. I have since taken them all out. Seriously, $80k. F this. Taking to dealer again tomorrow. Here are some pics as requested:

 

That is certainly not enough material to "mute" the microphones. Ultimately, it does looks better, but if you're still getting dizzy, go aggressive (and ugly) and shove a bunch of cotton around the entire microphone and base - not just the inner ring.

Posted

jasondenali15 - that does make sense to me. Compared to driving before the plugs, what percent did the plugs (when first installed) decrease pressure? What percent did they (when first installed) increase noise? I'm guessing 90% both ways. The increased (noise) and decreased (pressure) occurrence should have been very close if not simultaneous.

Posted

Jasondenali15 – wrench mentioned dealers look at you folks as “buffoons” and “idiots” for trying to get some relief by using cotton or foam for this issue, so I won’t suggest another option. You stated in an earlier post that the plugs worked. Put the plugs back in and tape them in place this time, maybe the one falling out compensated for the other two. Doing nothing while still driving the truck will make your situation worse. Also, a post identified a dealer who changed out the rear end and the problem was solved, ask your dealer about this.

 

Fellas, I sincerely apologize for my comments about looking like "buffons and idiots". I do not think anyone experiencing this problem are either. I was was merely trying to make a point about how GM and the dealers view the customers. I made the mistake of mentioning this Forum at my delaership to say I was not the only person with this issue (of course they said they never heard of the issue!!) and they all rolled their eyes at me. So, I was trying to keep us as factual and scientific as possible to avoid them from have such a terrible reaction. Sorry I chose the wrong words.

 

That said, I have had zero success with any tampering with the ANC. In fact, it makes the situation slightly worse in my vehicle and I meaaured the difference with a sound analyzer, so I have quantitative data. And, I definitely noticed more other noise, such as wind and mechanical noises from the drivetrain. Jasondenali15, that might be your situation??

 

At the end of the day, whatever you can do to alleviate the noise/pressure, the you gotta do what you gotta do. I'm just sharing what I've done and observed.

  • Like 1
Posted

jasondenali15 - that does make sense to me. Compared to driving before the plugs, what percent did the plugs (when first installed) decrease pressure? What percent did they (when first installed) increase noise? I'm guessing 90% both ways. The increased (noise) and decreased (pressure) occurrence should have been very close if not simultaneous.

You are right on the money with that assessment. One givith, one taketh away sort of speak.

Posted

I was wondering if you guys have a roof rack with the cross bars installed? I was one of the first to get the 15 Suburban and had that wind buffeting in cabin drone noise...I installed the roof cross bars and I'm not sure if that solved my issue or if it was when the dealer replaced my side roof bar.

Posted

Hi all, new to forum, but not new to Chevys. I am in the market for a new tow vehicle for a new boat I have coming in the spring. I have had a 2007 ltz Tahoe and now a 2011 ltz suburban, both of which have been excellent high mileage vehicles for me. I am / was in the market for another ltz suburban but this thread has me completely freaked out over potential next purchase. I drove one today trying to hear what others on here have experienced, I did not replicate it with the one I was driving. My question is are the ones prone to this born with it so to speak and you hear the issue from day one, or does something "break" over time. The one I drove did not have the issues spoke of on this forum at present, but not sure if they will develop and admittedly the one I drove (build date of October 30 2014) does not have all of the options (and color) that I would like to have....any input on this is greatly appreciated as to what I might expect next.....thanks in advance for your guidance!!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 545 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...