Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm more than happy looking like a "buffoon" with my cotton balls... You know why? It fixed 95% of the pressure I had... Have you used the idea yet, or have you simply used a cloth and tape? "JasonDenali" had his dealer actually use the idea and it seems to be working for him... Are we "idiots" now?

It seems your vehicle is having more problems than this topic will cover. Have the dealer distroy your truck and replace whatever they see fit... You keep referencing back to the roof fix, when more people have stated it didn't work.. Try the rearend replacement, and like Zip said, post up if that fixes it.

I apologize if my comments offended you. I absolutely meant no offence to you directly. And I absolutely believe that you have noticed a difference with cotton installed. Please accept my apologies.

 

Yes, I have tried cotton and found it did not resolve the issue. In fact, based on comparative measurements with a sound analyzer, the SPL actually increased at 22 hz by about 8 dB with the cotton inserted compared no cotton. Also noteworthy is that the sound signature is almost identical all all frequencies with ANC turned on and turned off. All based on the same road speed, same exact section of road.

 

The reason I am using a sound spectrum analyzer for comparative measurements is that using the ear for comparisons can be very objective. I don't want to be relying on my memory alone. Although I do agree that if you don't hear it, then it's all good!

 

Zip, I would be surprised if the cotton "falls" out. There is no where for it to go. The plastic grill will keep it well secured inside the foam ring that is present, so it would be physically impossible for it to move. That is, if the space in the foam ring was completely filled to begin with.

 

That does beg the question - for those who have removed their grills, is the foam ring present? Maybe some vehicles don't have it and that's why some folks need to fabricate something to secure the cotton. It is literally a round black foam ring about 3/8" thick, outside diameter about the size of a nickel, and a hole in through middle.

Posted (edited)

20sierra did not use the cotton with the grille, the grilles were left in the cupholder. There was nothing to hold down the cotton that's why it moved and needed to be replaced. Part of the Mic Well concept is to keep the cotton in place, or he could give the grille combined with the cotton a shot. The grille combined with cotton should keep the cotton within the center of the mic, but will do nothing around the mic. 20sierra's concept is to put cotton in the center and around the mic. Another part of the Mic Well is to isolate around the mic. And if cotton is used, to keep it in place. Keep in mind the Mic Well wasn't fabricated to use with cotton, but if cotton is used it will keep it in the center, around, and in place.

Edited by The Zip
Posted

Went to the GMC dealer to pick-up some grilles (actually called grilles) to do some testing with the Mic Well, but the cost was 26 bucks. Too expensive for me to conduct testing when its not going to benefit me. But I did find out the grille can't be sold separately, it comes with the mic. This would suggest the mic comes off. Someone take a flashlight and look around in the mic area, there may be a screw to take the mic off. That would be an option equivalent to pulling pins or disabling the mic. If that is the case, there would be no need for cotton, tape, ear plugs, mic plugs, mic well, or anything else that was mentioned.

Posted

Unfortunately, it looks like the entire headliner must be removed to get access to the back of the microphones. With the grill removed, there is a black plastic bracket on the opposite side of the hole in the headliner. It appears to be held in place by something on the top side of the headliner. I tried to move it but it is well secured. The microphone itself is quite small and can be seen through a very small hole in the middle of that black bracket. But, not possible the get at it, or it's wires.

 

If someone wants to disconnect the microphones, could do so at the amplifier itself. Looks like once the retaining clip is removed, the wires can be removed from the plug housing. Should be able to do without any permanent damage. Just don't forget to take a photo before removing the wires so they can be returned to the correct location.

Posted

Did some pushing on the head liner. All up front its 100% tight with no movement till you get to the sunroof and DVD player. Then it's super loose. Apx 2" of movement back by the AC vents.

While I wasn't initially inclined to have this dealer take the whole brand new Esclade apart. At this point, do whatever you want! Just can't handle it anymore. I love buying a new 85k car and dealing with this nonsense.

What's odd is some people have stated they aren't experiencing this pressure / buffeting. I haven't been in one 2015 Tahoe, Yukon, Escalade. Short and long that hasn't had this issue. I'm GUESSING others aren't sensitive to the pressure, or they just don't know what to be looking / hearing for. ??? My wife thinks I'm crazy, and she thinks our Escalade is the best thing ever. Our two daughters of course don't have a clue what the pressure is, but continuely complain that their ears hurt, and won't pop.

Let me call CCC again for the fourth day in a row and see if someone with try to get this moving in the right direction. Not a fan of this dealership !

Posted

If CCC is no help, the BBB Autoline is an attention grabber. While the Bose audio system is a cheap, poor excuse for audio in a car at this price point and the Bose ANC does have 'issues', it is the effect or symptom. It is not the cause. With 1000 of these being pushed out the door every day and only a small number of people reporting the problem, you can see why it isn't high on GM's priority list. That being said, those who have had medical issues, required consultation with a doctor, experienced dizziness, vomiting, disorientation or ear pain should be reporting these matters to the NTSB. That's the only way (a) it will really get attention and (b) there will be a published cause and resolution. Neither ZIP nor myself can be of much help since we don't have the issue.

 

As to individual sensitivity...yes, that is highly likely and equally likely problem vehicles are on the road and the owner is not aware of it. In my case, as an acoustician, I can tell you my two do not have the problem. When number 3 arrives that may change.

Posted

If CCC is no help, the BBB Autoline is an attention grabber. While the Bose audio system is a cheap, poor excuse for audio in a car at this price point and the Bose ANC does have 'issues', it is the effect or symptom. It is not the cause. With 1000 of these being pushed out the door every day and only a small number of people reporting the problem, you can see why it isn't high on GM's priority list. That being said, those who have had medical issues, required consultation with a doctor, experienced dizziness, vomiting, disorientation or ear pain should be reporting these matters to the NTSB. That's the only way (a) it will really get attention and (b) there will be a published cause and resolution. Neither ZIP nor myself can be of much help since we don't have the issue.

 

As to individual sensitivity...yes, that is highly likely and equally likely problem vehicles are on the road and the owner is not aware of it. In my case, as an acoustician, I can tell you my two do not have the problem. When number 3 arrives that may change.

 

Excellent point about reporting it to the NTSB! Never thought of that. I would except .... I'm in Canada. Our version, Transport Canada, is supposed to do the same thing, but from what I've seen of the NTSB website, it's a fair bit ahead of TC. Still, I might look into it. Thanks!!

 

BTW, what area of acoustics do you work in? Sounds very like a very interesting field.

 

To Tobtek's point, I agree that there is likely quite a few folks driving around with the same issue, possibly to various degrees of severity, that don't notice. That's sound for you! Some folks notice. Some don't. Some don't care.

 

Also, I definitely find my headliner is quite loose. An inch or two of movement at the mid-cabin. And, when I thump it with my hand, I hear the same sound as when driving (for only a cycle or two, mind you). Coincidence??

Posted

Excellent point about reporting it to the NTSB! Never thought of that. I would except .... I'm in Canada. Our version, Transport Canada, is supposed to do the same thing, but from what I've seen of the NTSB website, it's a fair bit ahead of TC. Still, I might look into it. Thanks!!

 

BTW, what area of acoustics do you work in? Sounds very like a very interesting field.

 

To Tobtek's point, I agree that there is likely quite a few folks driving around with the same issue, possibly to various degrees of severity, that don't notice. That's sound for you! Some folks notice. Some don't. Some don't care.

 

Also, I definitely find my headliner is quite loose. An inch or two of movement at the mid-cabin. And, when I thump it with my hand, I hear the same sound as when driving (for only a cycle or two, mind you). Coincidence??

 

Assuming the headliner is contributing to the sound, have you had a passenger push up on the headliner (to minimize it moving) while driving to see if it makes a difference?

Posted

 

 

 

 

Assuming the headliner is contributing to the sound, have you had a passenger push up on the headliner (to minimize it moving) while driving to see if it makes a difference?

 

Excellent question. No, not yet. But I plan to, or something similar.

Posted

Drove #3. Today. Nope, no buffeting, no pulsing pressure, no vibrations...still a crummy Bose system with overly aggressive bass.

Posted

Drove #3. Today. Nope, no buffeting, no pulsing pressure, no vibrations...still a crummy Bose system with overly aggressive bass.

 

I'd be happy with a Pep-Boys Radio if ours didn't have the pressure and sound issues. I just don't drive the new Escalade anymore. Not worth getting upset over for the day.

Has anyone else recieved a call from "GM early response team" ? I recieved a VM from a representative yesterday. Never spoke with these people when the Yukon was purchased back.

Posted

I'd like to thank all contributors of this thread for the continuous sharing of information. I was just about to order a 2015i Yukon Denali this week, but am concerned that:

  • There is no clear indication of what the problem is. Seems to be the roof. Or maybe the noise cancellation? Or, is the noise cancellation really just a symptom of the roof problem? [#PIT5318, "Wind Buffeting Droan Type Noise and/or Body Pressure Booming." Document ID: 3975780]
  • It isn't clear if the deficiency has been fixed at the factory and that all 2015i models are noise free.
  • Whether dealers have the tools & information to properly deal with this manufacturing defect.

I don't have false expectations that GM builds perfect cars, especially in the first model year. I do expect that dealerships [and their supplier, GM] take ownership for the problem(s) and do what it takes to keep customers happy. What some of you have experienced is horrific, especially at this price point.

 

--

Marc

Posted

So what are the chances of someone unhooking all the power and towing the vehicle down the road while sitting inside. That would at least narrow it down. Either electrical or mechanical.

Posted

Pushing on the flexible part of the headliner while the vehicle is off, windows up, and in park may have similar effects as driving or towing. Probably not electrical or mechanical, but a R&D error in headliner flexibility (just talking pressure)

Posted

@fourknuckles: If it was a roof flex problem, the wind resistance/pressure/profile would be very different behind a tow vehicle versus one pushing itself into the wind on it's own steam, no?

 

@Zip: How about pushing up on the headliner while driving at speed? In essence, prevent the roof from flopping by applying upward pressure?

 

@GM who seems to monitor this forum: is it unreasonable for you to reach out to management at the Texas factory to get feedback? Back when f-bodies were built in Canada, the Camaro/Firebird club had some contact and even took a couple of tours of the factory. We're not looking for top-secret information, just looking to make an informed purchase.

 

--

Marc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...