Jump to content

(Off Topic, but) Question about 2015 Malibu Start/Stop Feature


Service1956

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I much prefer to be able to read up on this sort of stuff online for free then to have to purchase/subscribe to a manual. The way it is described in that link, the average driver does not need to know the details to operate the car.

That's the ultimate goal.
Posted

I hear you there Doug ... but my point was, an entire "course" just to understand one system in a vehicle tells me that system has more complexity than it should.

 

I wish auto makers understood the phrase, "KEEP IT SIMPLE, STUPID!" It seems they go above and beyond purposefully engineering overly complex systems to ensure buyers never lift their hoods. This is one of the main reasons I'll never buy a new vehicle again.

 

Then, there is this little tidbit I was reading about John Deere & GM. If this is how they feel, and if there is any truth to this, I will make sure not ONE DIME of my money EVER finds it's way to EITHER company:

 

http://www.wired.com/2015/04/dmca-ownership-john-deere/

Posted

I hear you there Doug ... but my point was, an entire "course" just to understand one system in a vehicle tells me that system has more complexity than it should.

 

I wish auto makers understood the phrase, "KEEP IT SIMPLE, STUPID!" It seems they go above and beyond purposefully engineering overly complex systems to ensure buyers never lift their hoods. This is one of the main reasons I'll never buy a new vehicle again.

 

Then, there is this little tidbit I was reading about John Deere & GM. If this is how they feel, and if there is any truth to this, I will make sure not ONE DIME of my money EVER finds it's way to EITHER company:

 

http://www.wired.com/2015/04/dmca-ownership-john-deere/

 

There is one basic flaw in John Deere's and GM's logic. They do not own the hardware, only the soft/firmware running on it. If John Deere and GM win this, then you will have to apply that logic even deeper in the abyss. GM or John Deere have no interest or partnership in companies that manufacture the semi conductors that are the base of any digital system.

 

What do own though is the software/firmware installed on those semi-conductor based systems. Chances are that both GM and John Deere are also licensing code from some other company. Doubt either of them wrote the BIOS running on their PCM/ECM/TCM etc. This is exactly the same as your home computer. You own all the actual hardware, and you have a license to use software from the company that wrote that software.

 

The reason you can only get a license to use the software is simply due to copyright ownership. If you actually purchase the software, that also gives you the source code. I doubt most have any issue with them retaining ownership of the software. This keeps GM liable for the operation of the software, provided it is un-modified.

 

Some of the arguments provided in that article are taken way out of context, and being reported as being fact. Something he does not seem to want to address is who's name is listed as being the author or source of the firmware that someone has gone in and modified? I think you will find the original author is still listed as the author. Lets say something happens with the modified software, resulting in the death of someone. It goes to court, with the author being found liable even though he did not make the changes. Done correctly, any firmware can be modified and appear to be never modified. Problem with written words, you can never prove you did not write it. Remember, digital records are easy to alter when not encrypted.

 

What manufacturers should be doing is allowing the consumer to remove the software they do not like, and install their own. Or, make the software an option on the order form. If the standard installed software does not do what you want it to, Find software that does do what you want it to do and order the vehicle without the software installed. There are quite a few off the shelf injection systems out there now. Use one of those instead. That would be the fair thing to do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,972
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Whit.the.COB
    Newest Member
    Whit.the.COB
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 526 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Even tougher is the 5.0 / 302. That's what this one has.    https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   https://postimg.cc/4n3F3yzY   Just realized I had the airbox removed in the engine pic, lol.
    • Yep! This should be a pin somewhere as @pgamboa really dives into all of this. Thanks for reposting the link!
    • I did the new thermostat after doing a 'flip' for a year. Runs as cool one way as the other in the summer but in the winter there is a bit of a floor. Yellow with the new 70 C thermostat. My data over the life of the unit to date. Still need more cooler. Anyway that floor helped both winter fuel economy and shift quality in the winter. I found it a good balance.       
    • Evan Williams Bottled in Bond   So pouring the last of a bottle of Evan Williams Black label last night I set off the the state store for a refill only to be denied the by an empty shelf. Rats.    What the did have was a bottle of Evan Williams Bottled in Bond. 100 proof. Hum, a few bucks more but a known distiller. Lets have a swing at it. ( I have before )    Cracked it open and pour a serving over ice. Hum.... more heat, yes. More alcohol naturally. But the barreling not the proof brings the taste and this one came up short.    Oh is was familiar but the heat ran the barrel over like a Peterbilt runs over a squirrel. Could use a heavier toasting of the oak me thinks or perhaps a longer barreling. Who knows. But what I can say is ice or a water back isn't the answer. What kills one kills them both. Sad. It is a pleasant drink....if you have little to compare it to.  
    • I've had exactly one set of Bridgestone. Lasted five year and 125,000 miles and had I known better 15oK would have been a cake walk. I would have bought a like set had they not tripled in price since the first set. I removed them at said mileage with 5/32" remaining in dead even wear all four. They were fuel efficient, quite, comfortable and predictable.    Early on I got a very good alignment checked at least once a year, sometimes twice; kept the tires properly inflated, balanced and rotated. And I've found that many a tire issue can be avoided with great maintenance practices. Lot's of tire dealers will do rotation and balance (simple) for free for as long as you own the tire they sold you so no excuse not to.    Bead prep, alloy integrity and stem health have a huge impact on inflation stability. There are more mountings done poorly that perfectly. Finding a good tire guy is gold and as important as finding a tire you like.    That 3X price increase now two sets of "other tires' later is starting look like a bargain.      Bad maintenance kills more tires than bad tires. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...