Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking for some suggestions on how Big of Tires can I put on my truck it's a M-10008 that I'm customizing myself I sanded it down for about 2 weeks and painted it flat black then I spray painted it my camo style, Re painted the inside Army, Ronald liner the floorboard and now working on doing all in interior, blacking out windows, bigger tires and i need some opinions if possible

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk

post-152177-145143778078_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143779409_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143782557_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143786817_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143778078_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143779409_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143782557_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143786817_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143778078_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143779409_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143782557_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143786817_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143778078_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143779409_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143782557_thumb.jpg

post-152177-145143786817_thumb.jpg

Posted

they make big tires for the 16.5..

better off finding something else for wheel size, gets cheaper.

 

the gears are so short in the diffs, go as big as you possibly can fit, just to be a little more normal at highway.

maybe trim some fender for 35.

the back can go huge like every truck. Need to trim is up front.

 

I always wanted one, the m1009 especially.. 6.2 diesel.

Posted

33x what? An what rim should I go with I was told 15' but I have 16.5 rim now

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk

For 3/4t trucks starting in '74 16'' rims were the most common.My suburban's spare is a 16'' rim.I had a '77 GMC 3/4t truck with custom 16''x10'' rims that are on my burb now.The tires are 305/70r/16 and are almost 35'' tall.When the rims were new they had 265/70r/16 tires on them and were 33'' tall almost exactly.

 

I have a pic if you'd like to see it,but don't want to invade your thread.

Posted

The rims that were on this truck were 16.5 when I bought it and changed to 16'' when I realized the choice for 16.5 tires is extremely limited.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 737 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
    • And overpriced. I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant when they were being built. Very few. I could count on one hand how many I've seen since  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...