Jump to content

Let's do something about it!


Recommended Posts

Posted

Everybody that has had problems with their parking brake system needs to check out FIRECATS post : "Rear E-Brake Problems??" Then file a complaint with the National Highway Safety Administration. If they get enough complaints, they might make GM fix'em. :cool:

Posted

Mine is a 2000 model as well. But, the state inspector that failed my truck because of the faulty parking brake said that it is all new body style Chevy and GMC trucks, Suburbans, Tahoes, Yukons.

 

B.J.

Posted

Let me clarify something. My post was asking for help trying to identify a problem with my truck. At the time off my previous post, I had not taken apart the rear brakes, nor confirmed what my problem was. I was certainly leaning towards the e-brake. That being said, I finally took apart the rear brakes last night. What I found was the right rear inside pad worn out. All other pads are fine on the truck and the e-brake was fine.

 

I'm not saying something isn't wrong, there should be no reason why 1 out of 4 pads on the rear brakes wear prematurely compared to the rest.

 

Anyhow, sorry if this caused confusion, I was just trying to isolate my problem, which I finally did.

Posted

Then that pad could be causing all of the pulling action of the E-brake cable to be taken up.

 

Because the e-brake cable (if it is still that way) is pulling in the center of two cables going to each side.. one side that is bad takes all of the cable travel while the other does nothing.

Posted

Mine won't hold the truck either.

 

I don't think we'll see a recall on it, because it's not considered a serious safety issue. From what I've seen, they only force a recall when there's a serious safety issue WHILE DRIVING. A bad park brake doesn't do anything but put stress on the tranny while parked. NHTSA doesn't care about the parking pawl in our trannies.

Posted
Then that pad could be causing all of the pulling action of the E-brake cable to be taken up.

 

Because the e-brake cable (if it is still that way) is pulling in the center of two cables going to each side.. one side that is bad takes all of the cable travel while the other does nothing.

The e-brake cable uses a pair of "shoes" inside the hub, not the "pads that are used for regular braking.

Posted

OK, I filed my complaint with the Highway Safety whatever. My 2000 Yukon XL has the same problem. I haven't gotten around to looking at the problem. Maybe this weekend.

Posted
I don't think we'll see a recall on it, because it's not considered a serious safety issue.

If it's not a serious safety related issue, why is it inspected during a safety inspection?

Posted

I have a friend that has a 99 Z71 and it has the problem also. I had the Ebrake on the other day to back in his boat and you couldn't even tell it was on.

Posted

just to chime in.

i feel it is a grave safety hazard .

hence the term EMERGENCY BRAKE.

after all if your brakes fail this is the only other way to try and stop. i'll try to file a complaint also and urge all others who read this to do so also.

by the way i have had a 99 and 2000 and both were junk (e-brakes)only by taking them apart and adjusting them myself have i got the sierra to work properly. :cheers:

Posted

My parking went all the way to the floor and didn’t hold very well from day one. The dealer showed me a service bulletin that said it was due to the design of the brake and some b.s. about a low effort engagement.

 

When it was off warrantee and would almost not hold at all, I removed the rear rotors and adjusted the parking brake as shown in the service manual. Now it works like a champ. Goes about halfway down and holds good.

 

So don’t rule out the adjustment. To adjust it you need to remove the rear rotor/drum and it has a star adjuster just like a regular drum brake.

 

Doug

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 524 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...