Jump to content

Traction Control Problems - Silverado

BigGreen

Recommended Posts

BigGreen Enthusiast

BigGreen

Posted
Posted

Since day one, my 2001 Silverado's Traction Assist stops working when driven in heavy rain. The "traction off" LED illuminates, and the traction control no longer functions. Sometimes turning the engine off and then restarting it, will re-set it and allow it to work for a short time again.

 

I've had it to the dealer twice, and they not been able to solve the problem. Last time they said the PCM software set a traction control code, but they claimed that info was not specific enough to tell them anything.

 

They gave me very little hope that they would every be able to solve the problem. It still has a little time left on the warranty, so I will bring it in again this week.

 

Has anyone else had this problem?? I'm sure my truck was one of the first built with this system. :lol:

seadoons Enthusiast

seadoons

Posted
Posted

I don't think I'm familiar with this system...is your truck a 4WD with autotrac, and the "traction assist" you refer to is the auto 4WD?

woyster_00z71 Enthusiast

woyster_00z71

Posted
Posted

My mom has this system on her suburban. It is a 2WD system. Don't know exactly how it works either but it is on all the time unless you press the button to turn it off. My guess is that it has sensors to detect wheel spin and applies the brakes to correct it. I do know that it is just about impossible to get the tires to spin on her sub.

 

Sounds like GM needs to do something about it. Replace the whole system or give you a whole new truck or something. Really doesn't sound right. I know my mom's sub doesn't turn off in rainy weather. To me that should be when the system shines.

 

Just my 2 cents.

B.J.

dukbludvl Enthusiast

dukbludvl

Posted
Posted

I have the traction assist on my 2000 Yukon 2wd. I know exactly what you are talking about. This happens often on my Yukon when driven in heavy rain. It will say "Traction Off" or whatever (I forget exactly what it is that lights up). I figured this was just normal. I think it happens when it detects the wheels spinning. I'm not sure, but it might be that the system is working and it's letting you know that you have lost traction. Or, it could actually be a problem that the system is really turning off when it shouldn't.

 

Does the owner's manual say anything about this? Anyone esle out there have this system and seen this happen?

BgBlkAvalanche Enthusiast

BgBlkAvalanche

Posted
Posted

See if this helps,

Your two wheel drive traction assist is part of the ABS system that will detect wheel spin and reduce engine (only) torque when needed.No brake intervention is included.

I think there is a TSB out there to correct this traction assist system shutting off, and setting a fault code in rainy weather. It is actually an electrical issue caused by interference from the wiper motor system, and corrupting the rear wheel speed signal.

Have the dealer contact the technical service hot line and they should be able to give you more info.

Bob G. Enthusiast

Bob G.

Posted
Posted

ebod,

 

I would think that anyone would want traction control in any less than ideal traction condition such as rain, snow and ice. When your wheels are spinning, you have no control. I have never driven a truck with the traction control option, but my wife's Dodge mini-van has it and it works. Some systems brake the wheels, others do it through the transmission.

 

Bob G.

ebod Enthusiast

ebod

Posted
Posted

I was trying to be sarcastic and to poke fun of the irony arising from the fact that the traction control fails when you need it most (and vica versa).

 

My wife has a 4x2 Suburban with the traction control. I can tell you that it doesn't do much on dry pavement. When it rains, however, it's really useful.

Taaaaaaahoe? Enthusiast

Taaaaaaahoe?

Posted
Posted

Mine will shut off if I put gear selector in 1 for whatever reason.

Is lights up Low traction when the system is active I do belive...>SOunds odd that its only when wet...Mayeb it is that wiper motor thing!

 

Mike

SinisterSS Enthusiast

SinisterSS

Posted
Posted

My Camaro does the exact same thing - the traction control shuts off in the rain which is exactly when you don't want it to happen. Looks like the General has some issues with this type of system across the product line. :fume:

BigGreen Enthusiast

BigGreen

Posted
  • Author
Posted

:fume: Well,

 

I took it into the dealer today, and again they had no clue how to diagnosis it, and offered no hope of ever finding the problem. This is the third time I've had it in for this.

 

They thought I was stupid and that I was mistaking the "low traction" light coming on when the wheels spun, as opposed to the real situation of the "traction off" light coming on and staying on.

 

I had talked to the service manager before I took it in, and he said they would consult GM technical. But did they? No they did not. When I brought it up, the assistant service manager said he would call GM tommorow. I have zero confidence in this call producing anything because the asst. serv. mgr does not know enough about how it is supposed to work to even communicate the problem properly to GM. ARGHHH!!!!!!!!!!!

BigGreen Enthusiast

BigGreen

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes, This is a 2WD system. I don't think it applies the rear brakes at all. I think it only backs off of the fly-by-wire throttle when wheel spin is detected.

 

BgBlkAvalanche: Very interesting post about the electrical interference issue with the wipers. I'll dig into this more. I wonder if I personally can call GM tech??

Dihappy Enthusiast

Dihappy

Posted
Posted

BigGreen,

You are too much of a nice guy. I could not leave the dealership with that sort of an answer.

 

You need to demand that they fix it or call GM customer service and tell them your problem.

 

Also, make sure that the service manager enters this problem for your vehicle into the computer and notes it as "not fixed" or whatever applicable.

 

Some of these guys are absolute idiots and next thing you know youll be over your warranty mileage limit and theyll say they cant do anything for you unless you pay.

 

Make sure they give it to you in writing also.

BigGreen Enthusiast

BigGreen

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yep, I've been far to easy on them! I called GM customer service today. And I made an appointment at a competing dealer for tomorrow.

SinisterSS Enthusiast

SinisterSS

Posted
Posted

Reading through the service manual for my Camaro, one of the things it says to check for is the front wheel speed sensors shorting out because of the moisture.

 

Never have checked to see if this is the problem on my car, but it is my hunch that this is cause.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • ryan35205
      Lets Talk Z60 Suspension

      By ryan35205 · Posted

      Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Mykel544
      New Guy from Oklahoma

      By Mykel544 · Posted

      Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • newdude
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...