Jump to content

Which Tune: 87/89 octane or 91/93 octane tune


Recommended Posts

Posted

I purchased a custom tune from Lew at DiabLew Tune. But I'm uncertain whether to get the regular or high octane tune. For those of you who have been down this road is it worth the higher fuel costs to go with the high octane tune?

Posted

It seems if you watch the livestream data on a good scantool like a snap on or bosch unit (one that has a higher refresh rate for the data PIDs) the knock retard is actually quite prevalent even in stock tunes. I like to think that higher octanes even with stock programming are a good idea. To each his own, but someone reputable like Lew or Blackbear should be able to make a tune with a good safe timing advance that's worth at least a few horsepower. And if you're like some of us, any form of added horsepower is worth the cost of admission.

 

My advice - if you're comfortable spending the extra cash on high octane, then a performance calibration may be in your best interest!

Posted

It seems if you watch the livestream data on a good scantool like a snap on or bosch unit (one that has a higher refresh rate for the data PIDs) the knock retard is actually quite prevalent even in stock tunes. I like to think that higher octanes even with stock programming are a good idea. To each his own, but someone reputable like Lew or Blackbear should be able to make a tune with a good safe timing advance that's worth at least a few horsepower. And if you're like some of us, any form of added horsepower is worth the cost of admission.

 

My advice - if you're comfortable spending the extra cash on high octane, then a performance calibration may be in your best interest!

Thank you for your reply. I like the idea of running 91 or 93 because it is apparently better quality gas yielding better engine performance and in many situations there is no ethanol added. I just don't like paying the extra price but as the old saying goes, you get what you pay for (hopefully).

Posted

When I did the research on these new high compression engines it seem the general opinion was the higher grade the better. I had good access to E85 that was much cheaper than 93 gas sometimes even 87 grade gas. I was pretty satisfied with with the way the truck ran on E-85 with the exception of the V-4 and wanted a little more bump out of the transmission. I went with a hand held ( hypertec) and it worked great. On trips I ran midgrage gas ( when I couldn't get E-85) or reg gas. Couldn't see upping the timing by tuning the engine and being forced to run 93 gas when most people claim we should run it anyway for maybe 10 HP. I was getting 25 more on E-85 with choices on what grade to run. My truck ran, shifted very good.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 4,122 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...